Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Icon Health and Fitnes, Inc vs.sheriff Usman and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September, 2017 CS(COMM) 216/2016 ICON HEALTH AND FITNES, INC ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms. Prachi Agarwal and Mrinali Menon, Advocates. versus SHERIFF USMAN AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Represented by: None. ..... Defendants I.A. No.9876/2017 (under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC-by plaintiff) 1. By this application the plaintiff seeks judgment for the reason the right of the defendants to file written statement has been closed and defendants have been proceeded ex-parte.2. Application is disposed of pronouncing the judgment in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. CS(COMM) 216/2016 1. By the present suit, plaintiff seeks the following reliefs: (a) An order of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their principal officers, servants, agents, their affiliates, subsidiaries, distributors, and all others acting for and on their behalf from using th...
Santosh & Ors. Vs.united India Ins. Co. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~R-187 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.145/2010 SANTOSH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: None. Versus UNITED INDIA INS. CO. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Anil Kumar, then aged 34 years, a married person, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 04.06.2001 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.DL1A3571 which was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the first respondent (insurer). An accident claim case was filed by him (MACT No.668/2009) on 15.04.2002 seeking compensation for the injuries suffered. The Tribunals record shows that the inquiry into the claim petition remained pending even while the said original claimant (victim Anil Kumar) continued to be under treatment. He eventually died on 27.06.2006 and on the basis of applications moved, inter alia, i...
Raj Kumar @ Lala vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:2. d August, 2017 Judgment Pronounced on:12. h September, 2017 CRL.A. 1702/2014 RAJ KUMAR @ LALA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sheikh Israr Ahmad, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP CRL.A. 158/2015 RAHUL @ BHURI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Jitendra Sethi, Mr. Ambar Tewari, Mr. Hemant Gulati and Ms. Anshika Sethi, Advocates versus STATE, NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.1. Both the appeals arising out of a common judgment have been argued together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. Present appeals have been instituted under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the judgment dated 10.11.2014 and order on sentence dated 13.11.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Trial Court) in Sessions Cas...
Bhikki Ram vs.new Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~9, 10, 11, 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:12. h September, 2017 + W.P. (C.) 930/2017 BHIKKI RAM Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. ........ Petitioner versus Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing + W.P.(C) 1181/2017 Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates KUNWAR PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing + W.P.(C) 1191/2017 Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates SANJEEV KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent W.P. (C) No.930/2017 etc. Page 1 of 9 Through Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel with Mr. Mananjay Mishra and Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates + W.P.(C) 1218/2017 BA...
Gautam Seth vs.jaiveer Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % GAUTAM SETH RFA No.783/2017 12th September, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Kohli and Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocates. versus JAIVEER SINGH ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. Nos. 33243-44/2017 (for exemptions) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.33245/2017 (for condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal) Delay of 73 days in re-filing of the appeal stands condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.783/2017 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff RFA No.783/2017 Page 1 of 8 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 22.2.2017 dismissing the suit for recovery of Rs.11,00,000/- filed by the appellant/plaintiff along with the claim of interest. The relief clauses of the plaint read as unde...
Dinesh Mittal & Ors. Vs.m/s Triveni Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:12. h September, 2017 CO.PET. 39/2009 DINESH MITTAL & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Akhil Sibbal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Satish Choudhary, Adv. for Maximal/applicant. versus M/S TRIVENI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Sr. standing counsel with Ms.Megha Bharara, Adv. for Official Liquidator. Mr.Abhay K.Das, Adv. for BSF Family Welfare Society. Mr.Dheeraj Mr.Akshay Ringe, Advs. Triveni Association/Non-applicant Mr.Sanjay S.Chhabra, Adv. for Director of Triveni Ms.Kajal Chandra, Adv. Rajeev Bansal/Renu Rathi. and for Allottees Faridabad Malhotra for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.CA No.1462/2017 1. The applicant - Maximal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. entered into an agreement with the respondent company to develop 10.335 CO.PET. No.39/2009 Page 1 of 6 acres of land out of its 48 acres of land in Sector 89, Faridabad. H...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.satwanti & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 494/2014 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus SATWANTI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Inderjeet Singh, then aged 47 years, employed as peon with DAV Publication Division, as appointee of DAV College Management Committee, on the last salary of Rs.13,989/- per month, was riding on the pillion of motorcycle bearing registration No.DL- 8S-AC-8232 (the motorcycle) driven by one Naresh Kumar on 04.06.2009. As the motorcycle reached R.P. Chowk, traffic light near T.V. Tower, Pitampura, Delhi, it was involved in a collision with bus bearing registration No.DL-1PB-1815 (the bus), which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company for the period in question. Both Inderjeet Singh and Naresh Kumar suffered injuries, the former dyin...
u.p State Road Transport Corporation vs.kamla Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 788/2017 and CM3174131742/2017 U.P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate versus KAMLA DEVI & ORS Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Roshan Lal was employed as a driver with Uttar Pradesh State Road Corporation (UPSRTC) and was on duty at its Sahibabad Depot, Ghaziabad on 09.06.2015 when he suffered injuries at about 9.45 a.m., proved at the inquiry to have been caused due to the negligent driving of bus bearing registration no.UP-14-DT2059also belonging to UPSRTC, it having become the subject matter of investigation of first information report (222/2015) for offences under Sections 279 / 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered with police station Link Road, Ghaziabad. His wife and three children, they being first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants) instituted an accident MAC A7...
Suprio Mukherjee vs.bcd Electric Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 242/2017 and CM No.31227/2017 Date of decision :12. h September, 2017 SUPRIO MUKHERJEE ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Saurabh Prakash and Mr. Kunal Gosain, Advs. versus BCD ELECTRIC LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Gauhar Mirza and Mr. Shivang Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appellant assails an order dated 16th August, 2017 whereby I.A.No.2566/2017, filed by the appellant under Order VI Rule 16 and Order VIII Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the CPC in CS(OS)No.577/2016, was dismissed.2. It is submitted that the pleadings necessary for consideration of this appeal are already on record and consequently, with the consent of counsels for both sides, we have taken up this appeal for consideration. FAO(OS)No.242/2017 Page 1 of 5 3. The appellant along with Pradeep Mehra and Dibyendyu Bhattcharjee as co-plaintiffs, filed CS...
M/S Jain Technologies vs.m/s Salora International Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~61 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1000/2017 M/S JAIN TECHNOLOGIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Akanksha & Mr. Narendra Prasad Yadav, Advs. Versus ..... Respondent Through: None. M/S SALORA INTERNATIONAL LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER1209.2017 CM No.33248/2017 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM No.33249/2017 (for condonation of 25 days delay in re-filing the petition) 3.4. For the reasons stated, the delay is condoned. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1000/2017 & CM No.33247/2017 (for stay) 5. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 16th May, 2017 in Civil Suit No.11724/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-01 (ADJ) (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi]. striking off the defence of the petitioner for non-filing of the written statement.6. The counsel for the petitioner has argued that though the suit from which this pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »