Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subhash Chand vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:13. h September, 2017 + CRL.REV.P. 270/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 647/2017 SUBHASH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Soumitra Chatterjee, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Jasmer Singh, P.S. Jahangirpuri, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I.S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant revision petition is preferred by the petitioner under Section 397 Cr.P.C. read with Section 401 Cr.P.C for setting aside the impugned judgments dated 26.11.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02,North, Rohini Courts, Delhi in criminal appeal No.57463/2016, conviction judgment dated 28.01.2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-04 (North), Rohini District Courts, Delhi and order on sentence dated 04.04.2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-03, Rohini District Courts, Delhi in FIR No.titled State Vs. Subhash Chander. CRL.REV.P. 270/2017 Page 1 of...
Gita Sabharwal vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: September 13, 2017 + W.P.(C) 3442/2015 & C.M. 6154/2015 GITA SABHARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Iti Sharma & Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocates Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2-L&B/LAC Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for respondent No.3-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the suit lands i.e. Khasra No.56 min, situated in Revenue Estate of Village Behlolpur, Tehsil Mehrauli, Delhi are free from acquisition by reason of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2013).2. In the present case, the facts are that notification under Section 4 of the old Land Acqu...
Balbir Singh Saini vs.archaeological Survey of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.9944/2016 and CM No.39525/2016 Date of decision :13. h September, 2017 BALBIR SINGH SAINI ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Umesh Mishra, Adv. versus ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA AND ORS ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Vijay Joshi, Senior Standing Govt. Counsel with Mr. Prasanta Varma, Adv. for UOI/R-1. Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Standing Counsel for R-2 with Ms. Anju Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harsh Vardhan and Ms. Manishika, Advs. for R-4 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition has been filed complaining illegal and unauthorized construction in the property bearing No.75, Masjid Moth Village, New Delhi in violation of not only the provisions of the Delhi W.P.(C)No.9944/2016 Page 1 of 3 Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 but also of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.2. The counter affidavit has been ...
Rama Wati Goel vs.naresh Kumar Nandwani & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h September, 2017 RC.REV. No.337/2017 RAMA WATI GOEL ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Gera & Mr. Ravinder Versus Shekhar, Advs. NARESH KUMAR NANDWANI & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Harjeet Narang & Mr. K.K. Pahuja, Advs. AND + RC.REV. No.338/2017 DEVENDER LAL PIPIL ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Mr. Gaurav Seth & Ms. Rashmi Bhardwaj, Advs. Versus DR. RANJANA SAXENA ...Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Tyagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 RC.REV.No.337/2017 impugns the order [dated 26th December, 2016 in RC ARC No.858/2016 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC) (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi of dismissal of the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (Rent Act) filed by the petitioner for eviction of the respondents therein at the stage of consideration of the application of the respondents for leave to defend the said petit...
Pinki & Ors. Vs.rustam Ali & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-203 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.298/2010 PINKI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate Versus RUSTAM ALI & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Amit Gupta, a bachelor, died in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 11.11.2008 due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.HR-55-4809, admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer). His widowed mother and younger brother, now the appellants, instituted accident claim case (Petition No.600/2008) on 18.12.2008 seeking compensation. The tribunal, by judgment dated 04.11.2009, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.7,97,000/-, fastening the liability on the insurer to pay with interest, the said amount inclusive of Rs.7,67,000/- towards loss of dependency, Rs.20,000/- towards loss of love and affection and Rs.5,000/- each towards funeral expenses and l...
National Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.hari Krishan Jha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-193 to 197 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.236/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus GANESH CHANDER JHA & ORS. Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.237/2010 ........ RESPONDENTS NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RADHA DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.239/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus HARI KRISHAN JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC Appeal No.236/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 5 + MAC APPEAL No.241/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RAJJO DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.245/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus MANJULA JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL...
Gouranga Mandal vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.7941/2015 Reserved on:6. h July, 2017 Date of Decision:13. h September, 2017 INSPR SRISHTI KUMAR & ORS Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. ........ Petitioner % % UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel for UOI with Mr. C.K. Bhatt, Advocate. Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Advocate for R-6 to 69. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.7166/2016 GOURANGA MANDAL Reserved on:13. h July, 2017 Date of Decision:13. h September, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Aman Sinha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pravesh Thakur, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Sunieta Ojha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.The petitioners, twenty three (23) in number, in Writ Petition (Civil) No.7941/2015 have prayed for quashing of revised results dated 5th August, 2015 for selection and appointment to the post of W.P.(C)Nos...
State (n.c.t of Delhi) vs.ramphal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~6 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. L.P. 474/2017 Date of Judgment:13. h September, 2017 STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State along with Inspector Devendra Singh Oberoi, P.S. Nangloi versus Through: ..... Respondent RAMPHAL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.As. 13510/2017 (delay) & 13511/2017(delay in refiling) 1. These two applications are filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of 75 days delay in filing the leave to appeal and 404 days delay in refiling the appeal. Although, Courts have been liberal in condoning the delay in filing the leave to appeal and particularly in refiling, but in this case there has been inordinate and unexplained delay of 404 days in refiling the appeal. We do not find sufficient grounds to condone the delay in refilling the leave to appeal, however, since we have examined the case on merits, delay of filing the l...
Air India (Formerly Known as Indian Airlines) vs.commissioner of Sales ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: August 31, 2017 Date of decision: September 12, 2017 AIR INDIA LTD. ST.REF. 4/2004 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Tushar Gupta and Mr.Vibhor Garg, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Urvi Mohan, Mr.Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates. WITH ST.REF. 1/2015 AIR INDIA (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIAN AIRLINES) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Tushar Gupta and Mr.Vibhor Garg, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Urvi Mohan, Mr.Rhishabh Jetley, Advocates WITH ST.REF. 2/2015 AIR INDIA (FORMERLY KNOWN AS INDIAN AIRLINES) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Tushar Gupta and Mr.Vibhor Garg, STR No.4/2004 & connected cases Page 1 of 13 Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, DELHI ... Respondent...
Deen Dayal Upadhyaya College vs.ayushi Sethi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-12-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. 09.2017 + LPA5822017, C.M. APPL.32363/2017 DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAYA COLLEGE ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Beenashaw. N. Soni, Advocate. versus AYUSHI SETHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Dr. Ashutosh Pratap Singh, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Sh. Mohinder. J.S. Rupal and Sh. Prang Newmai, Advocates, for Respondent No.8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant is a constituent college of the Delhi University (hereafter, also, the college) and is funded and maintained by the grants received from the Government of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD). The college follows University statutes & Ordinances and is required to follow all the rules and regulations and notifications issued by the Delhi University, as the case may be, from time to time.2. The Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 are students (hereafter the students) of the college enrolled in the B. Com ...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »