Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anar Singh & Ors. Vs.kamlesh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-198 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL2622010 Decided on:13. h September, 2017 ANAR SINGH & ORS. Through: None versus KAMLESH & ORS. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Adv. for R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Sonu Pal @ Hemant, 18 years old at the relevant point of time, 1. statedly engaged in a private employment, suffered injuries and died in a motor vehicular accident that occurred at about 5.00 pm on 11.06.2004 when he was riding on the pillion of a bicycle, it being hit by the bus of Delhi Transport Corporation bearing registration no.DL- 1PB-5218, admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the seventh respondent (insurer). Two accident claim cases came to be instituted seeking compensation on account of the said death, one, (suit no.11/09/08/06, old suit no.158/08/06) submitted on 03.07.2004 by the first to fourth respondents herein (i.e. Kamlesh and her three daught...
United India Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.wasim Ahmad & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-200 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.277/2010 UNITED INDIA INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P. Acharya for Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Adv. Versus WASIM AHMAD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R. K. Bachchan, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent sustained injuries and suffered consequent permanent disability on account of motor vehicular accident that occurred on 01.07.2006 at about 7:30pm due to negligent driving of three wheeler scooter bearing registration No.DL1F1194 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company. He instituted accident claim case (suit No.743/2006) on 11.12.006 seeking compensation under Sections 166 and 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Tribunal awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 4,60,535/- and directed the insurance company to pay with interest, calculating it thus:-"MAC Appeal No.277/2010 Page...
Krishna Gupta & Ors. Vs.land Acquisition Collector (S) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: September 13, 2017 + W.P.(C) 8105/2013 & C.M. 14605/2016 KRISHNA GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. B.S. Maan, Ms. Sunita Mann, Mr. Paritosh Tomar, Mr. S. Rathee & Mr. Naresh Mann, Advocates Versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (S) & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms. Koumudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha & Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for LAC/ L & B Mr. M.U. Khan, Advocate for respondent No.2- DMRC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The controversy in these proceedings is whether petitioners claim for enhanced compensation in terms of Proviso to Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter called as the Act of 2013) is warranted.2. The facts necessary to decide the dispute are that in respect of the W.P.(C) 8105/ ...
Devender Lal Pipil vs.dr. Ranjana Saxena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h September, 2017 RC.REV. No.337/2017 RAMA WATI GOEL ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Gera & Mr. Ravinder Versus Shekhar, Advs. NARESH KUMAR NANDWANI & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Harjeet Narang & Mr. K.K. Pahuja, Advs. AND + RC.REV. No.338/2017 DEVENDER LAL PIPIL ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Mr. Gaurav Seth & Ms. Rashmi Bhardwaj, Advs. Versus DR. RANJANA SAXENA ...Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Tyagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 RC.REV.No.337/2017 impugns the order [dated 26th December, 2016 in RC ARC No.858/2016 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC) (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi of dismissal of the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (Rent Act) filed by the petitioner for eviction of the respondents therein at the stage of consideration of the application of the respondents for leave to defend the said petit...
Anand Singh & Anr. Vs.joginder & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-199 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.275/2010 ANAND SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mainee, Adv. versus JOGINDER & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The claim case (suit No.42/06/09) of the appellants related to 1. death of their child Shilpa aged 8 years, in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 30.07.2006, it having been clubbed with other claim cases for inquiry and decided by common judgment dated 16.11.2009. As per the averments, the accident had occurred due to negligent driving of tempo bearing registration No.DL1A6412by Joginder (first respondent), it being registered in the name of Gajraj Singh Yadav (second respondent) and insured against third party risk with New India Assurance Company Ltd. (third respondent). The third respondent (insurer) had raised the plea of breach of terms and conditions of the insuranc...
Sanjay Gupta vs.aarone Developers Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~41 & 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 09.2017 O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 73/2017 & I.A. 10589/2017 SANJAY GUPTA versus AARONE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD + ARB. A. (COMM.) 24/2017 & I.A. 10263/2017 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent SANJAY GUPTA versus AARONE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS. Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht and Mr. R. Gupta, Advs. Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr. Sachin Jain, Mr. S. Rai and Ms. M. Bhatia, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1309.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.10590 & 10591/2017 (Exemption) (COMM.) 73/2017 in O.M.P. (T) O.M.P.(T) (COMM.) 73/2017 & ARB. P. (Comm.) 24/2017 Page 1 of 4 The applications are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 73/2017 & ARB. A. (COMM.) 24/2017 1. The petitioner has filed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)...
mr.darshan Singh Bilkhu (@ Milkhu vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :13. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 TEST.CAS. 28/1991 MR.DARSHAN SINGH BILKHU (@ MILKHU)........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Pradeep Dewan, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Anupam Dhingra, Advocate for R3 9 and 11 Through : Mr.Satish Tamta, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Ruchi Kapur, Advocate. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Section 276 and 300 of the Indian Succession Act has been filed by the petitioner Darshan Singh Bilkhu @ Milkhu for grant of probate. It is contested by the respondents.2. Darshan Singh Bilkhu @ Milkhu claims to be the son of late Sh.Pargan Singh Milkhu who expired on 31.05.1990 at 131, Harrowdene Road, Wembley, England.... Petitioners case is that Pargan Singh Milkhu had executed a Will dated 29.05.1990 whereby the entire properties whatsoever owned by him in India were bequeathed to him. The Will dated 29.05.1990 is the last Will and...
Puran Chand Jain Through: Lrs vs.sukhbir Singh and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~6 & 7 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 241/2009 and CM APPL.7132/2009 SUKHBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus MOHD. KHAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate for R-2. + MAC.APP. 390/2009 PURAN CHAND JAIN THROUGH: LRS Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with ..... Appellants versus Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate SUKHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R-1.1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) Sukhbir Singh, appellant (in MAC APP.241/2009) had instituted accident claim case (Petition No.121/2009), on 04.02.1986 seeking compensation for injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 06.08.1985, statedly involving MAC Appeal No.241/2009 & 390/2009 Page 1 of 6 negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.DHG-5504 (the truck) by Mohd. Khan, a respon...
Vivek Raina Kampasi vs.deepika Raina
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~7. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 53/2017 1. VIVEK RAINA KAMPASI Through: Ms. Indu Kaul, Advocate ..... Appellant versus DEEPIKA RAINA Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % An affidavit of service has been filed by the appellant enclosing ORDER1309.2017 therewith a courier tracking report in respect of service sought to be effected on the respondent in the present appeal. As per the said tracking report, the respondent had received the summons on 31.08.2017.2. As none had appeared for the respondent on the first call, the matter was passed over. Even on the second call, none is present on behalf of the respondent. The respondent is accordingly proceeded against ex-parte.3. After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the appellant states that instead of pressing the present appeal, she may be permitted to withdraw the same while reserving the right of the appellant to take l...
National Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.manjula Jha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-193 to 197 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.236/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus GANESH CHANDER JHA & ORS. Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.237/2010 ........ RESPONDENTS NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RADHA DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.239/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus HARI KRISHAN JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC Appeal No.236/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 5 + MAC APPEAL No.241/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RAJJO DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.245/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus MANJULA JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL...
- ‹ Prev
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- Next ›
- Last »