Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Himanshu Gupta vs.vinod & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-185 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.125/2010 HIMANSHU GUPTA ..... Appellant VINOD & ORS. Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant, then a boy aged 14 years, was riding a motorcycle bearing registration No.DL7 AV3722 concededly unauthorisedly and against all caution including in the law, on 07.08.2007 when he came to be involved in an accident with Tanker bearing registration No.DL1 0306 of Delhi Jal Board (the second respondent), it being driven by its employee Vinod (first respondent) and suffered grievous injuries. The accident claim case (petition No.254/2007) was instituted on his behalf by his father and next friend Sanjay Gupta with the averments that the accident had occurred due to negligence on the part of the driver of the tanker, invoking Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The tribunal held inquiry and, ...
Sanjay Gupta vs.aarone Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~41 & 46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 09.2017 O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 73/2017 & I.A. 10589/2017 SANJAY GUPTA versus AARONE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD + ARB. A. (COMM.) 24/2017 & I.A. 10263/2017 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent SANJAY GUPTA versus AARONE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS. Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht and Mr. R. Gupta, Advs. Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankit Jain, Mr. Sachin Jain, Mr. S. Rai and Ms. M. Bhatia, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1309.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.10590 & 10591/2017 (Exemption) (COMM.) 73/2017 in O.M.P. (T) O.M.P.(T) (COMM.) 73/2017 & ARB. P. (Comm.) 24/2017 Page 1 of 4 The applications are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 73/2017 & ARB. A. (COMM.) 24/2017 1. The petitioner has filed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)...
Shyam Sunder Kausal vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
Date of decision :13. h September, 2017 $~2&3 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + SHYAM SUNDER KAUSAL Through : Mr. Akash Vajpai, Adv. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS W.P.(C) 4057/2016 versus ........ Petitioner ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Adv. for R-2 & 3. + W.P.(C) 10283/2016 FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Through : Ms. K. R. Chitra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Mohita, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) W.P.(C)Nos.4057/2016 & 10283/2016 Page 1 of 3 GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 By way of these writ petitions, the writ petitioners flag an important issue that there is an obnoxious practice of using arms, licenced and unlicenced, in public gatherings, religious places, marriage parties and other functions to f...
New India Assurance Company Limited vs.parveen @ Raj Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-204 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.300/2010 and CM APPL.8427/2010 (stay) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate Versus PARVEEN @ RAJ KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) The first respondent, then aged about 30 years, statedly working as a salesman in a private establishment, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 17.12.2005 due to negligent driving of vehicle described as Tata Sumo bearing registration No.DL- 1V-5279, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer) for the relevant period. On his claim petition, (Suit No.981/2008) instituted on 28.03.2006, the tribunal after inquiry, by judgment dated 31.03.2010, returned a finding that the accident had occurred due to negligent driving of said vehicle by Harminder Singh (the second respondent), it ...
National Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.rajjo Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-193 to 197 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.236/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus GANESH CHANDER JHA & ORS. Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.237/2010 ........ RESPONDENTS NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RADHA DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.239/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus HARI KRISHAN JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC Appeal No.236/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 5 + MAC APPEAL No.241/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RAJJO DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.245/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus MANJULA JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL...
Narayan Singh vs.gnctd of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. 09.2017 + W.P.(C) 7594/2015, C.M. APPL.14689/2015 VIJAY KUMAR RAJ KUMAR NARAYAN SINGH + W.P.(C) 7595/2015, C.M. APPL.14690/2015 + W.P.(C) 7596/2015, C.M. APPL.14691/2015 + W.P.(C) 7597/2015, C.M. APPL.14692/2015 + W.P.(C) 7598/2015, C.M. APPL.14693/2015 NATHI RAM JAI KUMAR ........ Petitioners Through: Sh. Rajesh Yadav, Sh. Lalit. K. Rawal, Sh. Sunil. K. Goel and Sh. Siddharth Gupta, Advocates. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .......... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Isha Garg and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates, for DDA. Sh. Siddharth Panda, Advocate, L&B/LAC in Item No.28. Sh. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, for L&B/LAC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % W.P.(C) 7594-7598/2015 Page 1 1. All the petitioners in these writ proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claim benefit of Section 24(2) of...
Nem Chand Sharma & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: September 13, 2017 + W.P.(C) 3446/2015 & C.M. 6157/2015 & C.M. 30776/2016 NEM CHAND SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Iti Sharma & Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocates GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2-L&B/LAC Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for respondent No.3-DDA Ms. Rishika Arora & Mr. Savi Abbot, Advocate in C.M. 30776/2016 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the suit lands i.e. Khasra No.491/1(12-2), admeasuring 09 bighas and 02 biswas, in Revenue Estate of Village Kilokri, Tehsil Mehrauli, Delhi are free from acquisition by reason of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter r...
Delhi Development Authority vs.sar Agencies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
2 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 914/2016 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Mrinalini Sen, Advocate with Ms. Kritika Gupta, Advocate. versus SAR AGENCIES ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Advocate with Ms. Kanika Bajaj and Mr. Mehak Nakra, Advocates. Date of Decision:13. h September, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral): I.A. 371/2017 in CS(COMM) 914/2016 1. Present application has been filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the present suit is barred by limitation and the present plaint does not disclose any cause of action. However, during the course of arguments, the parties have confined their submissions to the issue of limitation alone.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that on 10th August, 1992, plaintiff-DDA invited bids for construction of 135 MIG Flats at Sector-24, CS(COMM) 914/2016 Page 1 of 7 Rohini, Delhi. On 28th November, 1992,...
Mufti Abdus Sami Qasmi vs.national Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~28 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:13. h September, 2017 CRL. A. No.604/2016 MUFTI ABDUS SAMI QASMI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv. with Mr.Rajat Kumar & Mr.Chinmay Kanojia, Advs. versus NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr.Neel Kamal, PP, NIA & Ms.Rajul Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 21 (4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 impugning the order dated 10.06.2016 passed by the District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, NIA) in RC-14/2015/NIA/DLI arising from an FIR under Section 125 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 18, 18-B, 38 and 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 [in short the UA (P) Act]. whereby the application for grant of bail under Section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) filed on be...
M/S Sdb Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs.central Information Commissioner & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5588/2015 M/S SDB INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Mr. Ajay Tejpal and Ms. Anumeha Verma, Advocates. versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R2and 3 with Mr. Mukesh Tinna, UDC with official records. Mr. Riju Raj Jamwal, Advocates for R4and 5. Mr. Vedanta Varma, Adv. for Mr. Amit Bhagat, Advocate for R7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1309.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning the order dated 1. 02.03.2015 (hereafter 'the impugned order'), passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter 'the CIC') rejecting the second appeal preferred by Mr AK Kaul (who is stated to be an employee - designated as vice president - of the petitioner) under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter 'the act'). The present petition is also filed through Mr A.K Kaul. W....
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »