Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.radha Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-193 to 197 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.236/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus GANESH CHANDER JHA & ORS. Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.237/2010 ........ RESPONDENTS NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RADHA DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.239/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus HARI KRISHAN JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC Appeal No.236/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 5 + MAC APPEAL No.241/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RAJJO DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.245/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus MANJULA JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL...
Inspr Srishti Kumar & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.7941/2015 Reserved on:6. h July, 2017 Date of Decision:13. h September, 2017 INSPR SRISHTI KUMAR & ORS Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. ........ Petitioner % % UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel for UOI with Mr. C.K. Bhatt, Advocate. Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Advocate for R-6 to 69. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.7166/2016 GOURANGA MANDAL Reserved on:13. h July, 2017 Date of Decision:13. h September, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Aman Sinha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pravesh Thakur, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS Versus ..... Respondent Through Ms. Sunieta Ojha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.The petitioners, twenty three (23) in number, in Writ Petition (Civil) No.7941/2015 have prayed for quashing of revised results dated 5th August, 2015 for selection and appointment to the post of W.P.(C)Nos...
Gurvinder Pal Singh vs.banarsi Dass (Deceased) Through Lr Ashwani Gula ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 C.R.P. No.203/2017 GURVINDER PAL SINGH ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan Arya and Mr. Versus H.D. Aneja, Advs. BANARSI DASS (DECEASED) THROUGH LR ASHWANI GULATI & ORS ...Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.33448/2017 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. C.R.P. 203/2017 & CM No.33447/2017 (for stay) 3. This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order [dated 31st May, 2017 in CSDJ- 103of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-14 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. allowing the application under Order XXII Rule 3 of CPC of the respondent No.1 Ashwani Gulati for impleadment in place of his deceased father Banarsi Dass, who had instituted the suit (from which this petition arises) against the respondents Nos.2&3 and petitioner, inter alia f...
Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd vs.brij Gopal Const ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 09.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 269/2016 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD versus ........ Petitioner BRIJ GOPAL CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent :Mrs Biji Rajesh and Mr Gaurang Kanth. :Mr Bhupesh Narula. + O.M.P. (COMM) 279/2016 AND BRIJ GOPAL CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD versus ........ Petitioner DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : Mr Bhupesh Narula. : Mrs Biji Rajesh and Mr Gaurang Kanth. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The present petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), impugning the arbitral award dated 31.12.2015 (hereafter the impugned award), made O.M.P. (COMM.) Nos. 269/2016 & 279/2016 Page 1 of 20 and publi...
Nathi Ram vs.gnctd of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. 09.2017 + W.P.(C) 7594/2015, C.M. APPL.14689/2015 VIJAY KUMAR RAJ KUMAR NARAYAN SINGH + W.P.(C) 7595/2015, C.M. APPL.14690/2015 + W.P.(C) 7596/2015, C.M. APPL.14691/2015 + W.P.(C) 7597/2015, C.M. APPL.14692/2015 + W.P.(C) 7598/2015, C.M. APPL.14693/2015 NATHI RAM JAI KUMAR ........ Petitioners Through: Sh. Rajesh Yadav, Sh. Lalit. K. Rawal, Sh. Sunil. K. Goel and Sh. Siddharth Gupta, Advocates. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .......... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Isha Garg and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates, for DDA. Sh. Siddharth Panda, Advocate, L&B/LAC in Item No.28. Sh. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, for L&B/LAC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % W.P.(C) 7594-7598/2015 Page 1 1. All the petitioners in these writ proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claim benefit of Section 24(2) of...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi vs.dr. Rishi Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~19. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 09.2017 % W.P.(C) 8134/2017 & C.M. No.33423/2017 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan with Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus DR. RISHI ANAND Through: Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Cav. No.815/2017 Since the caveator has put in appearance, the caveat stands discharged. C.M. No.33424/2017 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8134/2017 Page 1 of 14 W.P.(C) 8134/2017 & C.M. No.33423/2017 1. Learned counsel for the respondent/ caveator has appeared. We have heard learned counsels for the parties. With their consent, we proceed to dispose of the petition at this stage itself.2. The petitioner has preferred the present petition to assail the order dated 29.05.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delh...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.charanjit & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-191 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.171/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.D. Singh & Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advs. Versus CHARANJIT & ANR. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant insurance company was burdened with the liability to pay compensation determined under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the motor accident claims tribunal by its judgment dated 17.09.2009 on the claim petition of the second respondent herein, due to death of her husband Atma Ram Malik in a motor vehicular accident involving three wheeler scooter described as TSR bearing registration No.DBR-3958 driven by the first respondent. The insurance company, while putting in contest, had pleaded that there has been a breach of terms and conditions of the insurance company as the driver did not hold a valid or effective driving license. This plea was rejecte...
Manoj Kumar vs.dharambir Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-192 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.220/2010 MANOJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mainee, Adv. Versus DHARAMBIR SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant while riding on TVS scooty bearing registration No.DL8/NA-0310, on the pillion, on 21.11.2006, suffered grievous injuries due to motor vehicular accident that was caused on account of negligent driving of Santro car bearing registration No.DL4J0966 admittedly insured against third party risk with third respondent (insurer). On his claim petition (petition No.930/2008), which was clubbed for inquiry with another claim case arising out of the same accident, the tribunal, by judgment dated 15.12.2009, awarded MAC Appeal No.220/2010 Page 1 of 3 compensation in the total sum of Rs. 85,000/-, which includes Rs. 52,000/- towards medical expenses and Rs. 20,000/- on accou...
Subodh Singh vs.vijay Mahajan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~42 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 639/2017 SUBODH SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Adv. Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW VIJAY MAHAJAN Through: ..... Respondent ORDER1309.2017 % CM No.33528/2017 (of petitioner u/S151CPC for stay) 1. Notice of CM(M) 639/2017 was issued vide order dated 30th May, 2017. Though the petitioner did not take any steps for service of the respondent but the respondent appeared on the last date of hearing when the matter could not be taken up owing to paucity of time.2. This application has been filed for stay of proceedings in the Trial Court.3. Though the counsel for the respondent does not appear but prima facie not finding any merit in CM(M) 639/2017 itself, it is deemed appropriate to hear the counsel for the petitioner on the main petition itself.4. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 639/2017 & CM No.21425/2017 (for stay) 5. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impug...
Pravesh Jain vs.oswal Woollen Mills Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h September, 2017 PRAVESH JAIN CM(M) No.248/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal and Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advs. versus OSWAL WOOLLEN MILLS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Purua Mehta, Ms. Sakshi Bhayana and Mr. Devesh Gupta, Advs. AND OSWAL WOOLLEN MILS LTD CM(M) No.771/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Purua Mehta, Ms. Sakshi Bhayana and Mr. Devesh Gupta, Advs. versus PRAVESH JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal and Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 CM(M) No.248/2017 impugns the order (dated 25th January, 2017 in E-2of the Court of Additional Rent Controller-2 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts) granting leave to defend to the respondent to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 filed by the petitioner.2. CM(M) No.771/2017 has been pref...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »