Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shelly Khetrapal vs.mohd.hanif & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~3 to 6 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 524/2008 Decided on:14. h September, 2017 SIDHARTH KHETRAPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate with Mr. Animesh Mishra & Mr. Ashish Khatri, Advocates versus MOHD.HANIF & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocate with Mr. Rishal Vij, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Ashish Kalra, Advocate for R-3. + MAC.APP. 525/2008 & CM APPL295162016 & CM APPL295172016 SHELLY KHETRAPAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate with Mr. Animesh Mishra & Mr. Ashish Khatri, Advocates versus MOHD.HANIF & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocate with Mr. Rishal Vij, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Ashish Kalra, Advocate for R-3. + MAC.APP. 526/2008 SHELLY KHETRAPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate with MAC Appeal No.524/2008 etc. Page 1 of 17 Mr. Animesh Mishra & Mr. Ashish Khatri, Advocates versus MOHD.HANIF & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Noo...
Brij Gopal Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd vs.delhi State Industrial Develop ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:13. 09.2017 + O.M.P. (COMM) 269/2016 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD versus ........ Petitioner BRIJ GOPAL CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent :Mrs Biji Rajesh and Mr Gaurang Kanth. :Mr Bhupesh Narula. + O.M.P. (COMM) 279/2016 AND BRIJ GOPAL CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD versus ........ Petitioner DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU : Mr Bhupesh Narula. : Mrs Biji Rajesh and Mr Gaurang Kanth. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The present petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), impugning the arbitral award dated 31.12.2015 (hereafter the impugned award), made O.M.P. (COMM.) Nos. 269/2016 & 279/2016 Page 1 of 20 and publi...
Jai Kumar vs.gnctd of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. 09.2017 + W.P.(C) 7594/2015, C.M. APPL.14689/2015 VIJAY KUMAR RAJ KUMAR NARAYAN SINGH + W.P.(C) 7595/2015, C.M. APPL.14690/2015 + W.P.(C) 7596/2015, C.M. APPL.14691/2015 + W.P.(C) 7597/2015, C.M. APPL.14692/2015 + W.P.(C) 7598/2015, C.M. APPL.14693/2015 NATHI RAM JAI KUMAR ........ Petitioners Through: Sh. Rajesh Yadav, Sh. Lalit. K. Rawal, Sh. Sunil. K. Goel and Sh. Siddharth Gupta, Advocates. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .......... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Isha Garg and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates, for DDA. Sh. Siddharth Panda, Advocate, L&B/LAC in Item No.28. Sh. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, for L&B/LAC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % W.P.(C) 7594-7598/2015 Page 1 1. All the petitioners in these writ proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claim benefit of Section 24(2) of...
Chirangi Lal (Deceased) Thr Legal Representative vs.bishamber Sharma & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~31 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CHIRANGI LAL (DECEASED) THR LEGAL EPRESENTATIVE FAO(OS) 246/2017 Date of decision :13. h September, 2017 Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with ..... Appellant versus BISHAMBER SHARMA & ORS Mr. T.N. Saxena, Mr. H.C. Kharbanda and Mr. Naveen, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Mehul Parti, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This appeal assails the order dated 13th July, 2017 passed in CS(OS) No.740/2013 whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed two applications, the first one being IA No.22119/2015 (U/O XXII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) for bringing on record legal heirs of the sole plaintiff Chirangi Lal and IA No.22120/2015 (U/s. 5 of the Limitation Act) praying for condonation of delay in filing IA No.22119/2015.2. The appellant is stated to be a poor agriculturist and we are informed that he is not in a ...
Sukhbir Singh vs.mohd. Khan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~6 & 7 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 241/2009 and CM APPL.7132/2009 SUKHBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus MOHD. KHAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate for R-2. + MAC.APP. 390/2009 PURAN CHAND JAIN THROUGH: LRS Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Advocate with ..... Appellants versus Mr. Satish Kumar, Advocate SUKHBIR SINGH AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA R-1.1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) Sukhbir Singh, appellant (in MAC APP.241/2009) had instituted accident claim case (Petition No.121/2009), on 04.02.1986 seeking compensation for injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 06.08.1985, statedly involving MAC Appeal No.241/2009 & 390/2009 Page 1 of 6 negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.DHG-5504 (the truck) by Mohd. Khan, a respon...
National Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.ganesh Chander Jha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~R-193 to 197 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.236/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus GANESH CHANDER JHA & ORS. Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.237/2010 ........ RESPONDENTS NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RADHA DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.239/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus HARI KRISHAN JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC Appeal No.236/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 5 + MAC APPEAL No.241/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus RAJJO DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC APPEAL No.245/2010 NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus MANJULA JHA & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL...
Vijay Kumar vs.gnct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. 09.2017 + W.P.(C) 7594/2015, C.M. APPL.14689/2015 VIJAY KUMAR RAJ KUMAR NARAYAN SINGH + W.P.(C) 7595/2015, C.M. APPL.14690/2015 + W.P.(C) 7596/2015, C.M. APPL.14691/2015 + W.P.(C) 7597/2015, C.M. APPL.14692/2015 + W.P.(C) 7598/2015, C.M. APPL.14693/2015 NATHI RAM JAI KUMAR ........ Petitioners Through: Sh. Rajesh Yadav, Sh. Lalit. K. Rawal, Sh. Sunil. K. Goel and Sh. Siddharth Gupta, Advocates. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .......... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Isha Garg and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates, for DDA. Sh. Siddharth Panda, Advocate, L&B/LAC in Item No.28. Sh. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, for L&B/LAC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % W.P.(C) 7594-7598/2015 Page 1 1. All the petitioners in these writ proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claim benefit of Section 24(2) of...
Jeet Singh vs.deputy Commissioner of Police & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8536/2014 Date of Decision 13th September, 2017 JEET SINGH Through: versus... Petitioner-in-person ........ Petitioner DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR. Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD with Ms.Niti Jain, Mr.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition assails the order dated 22.07.2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.1779/1994 dismissing the... Petitioners said O.A. The... Petitioner, who was a Constable in the Respondent i.e. Delhi Police, had preferred the aforesaid O.A challenging order dated 22.10.1993 vide which he was dismissed from service.2. The... Petitioner had joined Delhi Police/Respondent as a Constable on 08.09.1982 and received as many as thirty five certificates and cash rewards for his meritorious service and in his 13 years of service before his impugned dismissal. WP(C) No.8536/2014 Page 1 of ...
Raj Kumar vs.gnctd of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:13. 09.2017 + W.P.(C) 7594/2015, C.M. APPL.14689/2015 VIJAY KUMAR RAJ KUMAR NARAYAN SINGH + W.P.(C) 7595/2015, C.M. APPL.14690/2015 + W.P.(C) 7596/2015, C.M. APPL.14691/2015 + W.P.(C) 7597/2015, C.M. APPL.14692/2015 + W.P.(C) 7598/2015, C.M. APPL.14693/2015 NATHI RAM JAI KUMAR ........ Petitioners Through: Sh. Rajesh Yadav, Sh. Lalit. K. Rawal, Sh. Sunil. K. Goel and Sh. Siddharth Gupta, Advocates. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .......... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Isha Garg and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates, for DDA. Sh. Siddharth Panda, Advocate, L&B/LAC in Item No.28. Sh. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, for L&B/LAC. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % W.P.(C) 7594-7598/2015 Page 1 1. All the petitioners in these writ proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claim benefit of Section 24(2) of...
Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd vs.pravesh Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h September, 2017 PRAVESH JAIN CM(M) No.248/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal and Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advs. versus OSWAL WOOLLEN MILLS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Purua Mehta, Ms. Sakshi Bhayana and Mr. Devesh Gupta, Advs. AND OSWAL WOOLLEN MILS LTD CM(M) No.771/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Purua Mehta, Ms. Sakshi Bhayana and Mr. Devesh Gupta, Advs. versus PRAVESH JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal and Mr. B.S. Chauhan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 CM(M) No.248/2017 impugns the order (dated 25th January, 2017 in E-2of the Court of Additional Rent Controller-2 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts) granting leave to defend to the respondent to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 filed by the petitioner.2. CM(M) No.771/2017 has been pref...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »