Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.ram Pat Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P.636/2012 Reserved on:05. 09.2017 Delivered on:14. 09.2017 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner versus RAM PAT GARG ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Narender Mann, Spl. Public Prosecutor with Mr. Manoj Pant : Mr.Anil Grover with Ms.Noopur Singhal and Mr. Mishal Vij For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner/CBI has questioned the order dated 03.08.2012 passed by the Special Judge, P.C. Act (CBI-09), Central District, Tis Hazari: Delhi in RC No.29A/08 whereby the respondent/Ram Pat Garg, the then Superintending Engineer was discharged on the ground of invalid sanction to prosecute him as the sanction to prosecute was accorded by a person who was not competent for the same.2. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner/CBI that RC No.29A/08 was registered on 27.06.2008 against the respondent for having dema...
Mohd Jamil vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 11, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: September 14, 2017 CRL.A. 669/2017 MOHD JAMIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate with Mr.Pranjal Shekhar, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT1 The appellant has preferred the instant appeal assailing the judgment dated 21st April, 2017 whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and under Section 25 & 27 of Arms Act and order on sentence dated 25th April, 2017 whereby he has been sentenced as under:-"(i) U/S307IPC (ii) U/S251) of Arms Act : : to undergo RI for ten years with fine of 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for two years. to undergo RI for three years with fine of 8,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for seven months. (iii) U/S271) of Arms Act : to undergo RI for ...
M/S Gmb Ceramics Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2681/2017 & CM APPL. No.11621/2017 ........ Petitioner M/S GMB CERAMICS LTD. Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. Pulkit versus Deora and Mr. Lucky Palta, Advocates UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sankalp Jain, proxy counsel for Ms. Namisha Gupta, Advocate for R1 Mr. Neeraj Chaudhry, Advocate for R-2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter ORDER1409.2017 alia for quashing the order dated 20.10.2016, passed by the BIFR.2. Mr. Bhandari, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 20.10.2016, the BIFR had sanctioned a Draft Restructuring Scheme in respect of the respondent no.2/Company. The petitioner is an unsecured creditor of the respondent no.3/Company and had sought to intervene in the proceedings pending before the BIFR, but no such permission was granted and the said applic...
Rafique vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. + CRL.A. 208/2016 NAZIM ..... Appellant Through Mr.Ritesh Bahri, Adv. with Mr.Vipin Bansal and Mr.Pradeep Prajapati, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. Crl. Appeals 207/2016, 208/2016, 345/2016, 467/2016 &530/2016 Page 1 of 20 + CRL.A. 345/2016 RAHIS Through Mr.Gaurav Vashistha, Adv. with Mr.Jagdish Chandra, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. + CRL.A. 467/2016 AZMAL @ ASLAM STATE ..... Appellant Through Mr.Aditya Guar...
Surjit & Ors. Vs.syed Asgar Hussain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 989/2016 Decided on:14. h September, 2017 SURJIT & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Roshan Saini, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocate versus SYED ASGAR HUSSAIN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Raghav, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Dushyant Yadav, Adv. & Mr. Puneet Kumar, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Pradeep Gaur proxy counsel for Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants with the fifth respondent (Ram Pati) as co- petitioners had filed the accident claim case (Suit No.656/2012) on 17.09.2012 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the tribunal) at Delhi seeking compensation on account of death of Ram Baksh in a motor vehicular accident that had statedly occurred on 23.04.2004 within the jurisdiction of Police Station Paschim Vihar, New Delhi allegedly involving two vehicles, one being three wheeler scooter bearing registration No.DL-1RE-4161 (the TSR) and, the other, bus be...
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.ram Bhaj Bansal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P.68/2013 Reserved on:05. 09.2017 Delivered on:14. 09.2017 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner versus RAM BHAJ BANSAL & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Narender Mann, Spl. Public Prosecutor For the... RESPONDENTS with Mr. Manoj Pant : Mr.Anil Grover with Ms.Noopur Singhal and Mr. Mishal Vij CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner/CBI has questioned the impugned order dated 26.10.2012 passed by the Special Judge CBI (P.C. Act) Karkardooma Court: East District, Delhi in RC No.1(A)/05-ACU (VIII) whereby the respondents/Ram Bhaj Bansal and Krishan Mohan, the then Executive Engineers, were discharged on the ground of invalid sanction to prosecute him as the sanction to prosecute was accorded by a person who was not competent for the same.2. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner/CBI that RC No.1(A)/05-ACU (VIII...
Wing Commander Arvind Kumar vs.directore General, Bsf & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.3916/2015 Date of decision:14. h September, 2017 WING COMMANDER ARVIND KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S.C. Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Arvind Kumar, Wing Commander. versus DIRECTORE GENERAL, BSF & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC and Mr. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Wing Commander Arvind Kumar is a commissioned officer of the Indian Air Force (IAF). The petitioner had joined the Aeronautical Engineering (Mechanical) branch of the IAF on 25th March, 1991. In 1996, the petitioner was selected in the stream of Flight Engineer to perform aircrew duties. He was promoted to the rank of Squadron Leader with effect from 15th January, 1999. W.P. (C) No.3916/2015 Page 1 of 11 2. The petitioner had opted to join Border Security Force (BSF), Air Wing on deputation at the post of Senior Air...
Surender @ Chhinda vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 862/2016 % SURENDER @ CHHINDA Date of Decision:14. 09.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Nitin Tittal, Adv. with Ms.Supriya, Adv. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Piyush Singhal, Adv. Insp.Pawan Kumar PS Geeta Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J (ORAL) 1. Surender @ Chhinda, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.01.2016 passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police-01, East District, Delhi in connection with file no.75/2015 whereby he has been externed from the limits of NCT of Delhi for a period of two years as well as the order passed by the Honble Lieutenant Governor dated 17.02.2016 in case no.19/2016 whereby the order of the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police-01, East District, Delhi, externing the petitioner, has been affirmed and upheld. W.P(Crl) No.862/2016 Page 1 of 10 2. A proposal for ex...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.deepak Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 855/2015 and CM APPL.26106/2015 (stay) THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate versus DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sayak Bandhyopadhyay, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Advocate for R-1.1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The first respondent received injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 22.02.2013 due to negligent driving of Maruti Van bearing registration No.DL-5CF-5317 and instituted accident claim case (MAC No.38A/2013). The Tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 14.09.2015, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs,13,47,753/-, which includes loss of future earnings, due to functional disability assessed to the extent of thirty per cent (30%). The liability has been fastened on the appellant (insurer), it admittedly having issued an insurance policy covering the third party risk in respect of the offending v...
Joginder Singh & Anr vs.davender Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~R-208 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL3352010 Decided on:14. h September, 2017 JOGINDER SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: None versus DAVENDER SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Sudhir, a bachelor, aged 23 years, son of the appellants died due to the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 30.10.2006 due to the negligent driving of a bus bearing registration no.DL-1PA-0337 insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer). On their accident claim case (petition no.1368/2006) instituted on 21.12.2006, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by its judgment dated 22.10.2009, awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.3,37,680/- (inclusive of interim compensation), the said amount also including Rs.2,95,680/- towards loss of dependency, Rs.2,000/- towards transportation charges, Rs.10,000/- each towards funeral exp...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »