Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Girija K Pillai & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:14. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 320/2015 GIRIJA K PILLAI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mishal Vij, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for R-1 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Krishna Pillai, aged about 35 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 28.03.2008 due to the negligent driving of a vehicle described as a truck bearing registration no.87D73369M owned the respondents and died in the consequence. The appellants being the members of his family dependent on him, instituted accident claim case (MACP No.374/08/14) on 23.08.2008 seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.2. After inquiry, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 06.01.2015, accepted the claim for compensation MAC A3202015 Page 1 of 4 holding the driver of the offen...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.kaushliya & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~R-210 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL3702010 Decided on:14. h September, 2017 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus KAUSHLIYA & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (suit no.355/2007) was instituted by first to fifth respondents on 10.10.2007 seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 due to the death of Om Prakash in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 29.08.2007 involving the negligent driving of a Tempo bearing registration No.PB-32-NTP-4822, admittedly registered in the name of the seventh respondent (registered owner). The case was based on the allegations that the cause for accident was the negligent driving by the driver (sixth respondent).2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 29.03.2010, accepted the said claim for compensation holding the driv...
Azmal @ Aslam vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. + CRL.A. 208/2016 NAZIM ..... Appellant Through Mr.Ritesh Bahri, Adv. with Mr.Vipin Bansal and Mr.Pradeep Prajapati, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. Crl. Appeals 207/2016, 208/2016, 345/2016, 467/2016 &530/2016 Page 1 of 20 + CRL.A. 345/2016 RAHIS Through Mr.Gaurav Vashistha, Adv. with Mr.Jagdish Chandra, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. + CRL.A. 467/2016 AZMAL @ ASLAM STATE ..... Appellant Through Mr.Aditya Guar...
Nupur Khetrapal vs.mohd.hanif & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~3 to 6 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 524/2008 Decided on:14. h September, 2017 SIDHARTH KHETRAPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate with Mr. Animesh Mishra & Mr. Ashish Khatri, Advocates versus MOHD.HANIF & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocate with Mr. Rishal Vij, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Ashish Kalra, Advocate for R-3. + MAC.APP. 525/2008 & CM APPL295162016 & CM APPL295172016 SHELLY KHETRAPAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate with Mr. Animesh Mishra & Mr. Ashish Khatri, Advocates versus MOHD.HANIF & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocate with Mr. Rishal Vij, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Ashish Kalra, Advocate for R-3. + MAC.APP. 526/2008 SHELLY KHETRAPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Advocate with MAC Appeal No.524/2008 etc. Page 1 of 17 Mr. Animesh Mishra & Mr. Ashish Khatri, Advocates versus MOHD.HANIF & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Noo...
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.rajinder Prakash Kohli
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P.501/2012 Reserved on:05. 09.2017 Delivered on:14. 09.2017 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner versus RAJINDER PRAKASH KOHLI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Narender Mann, Spl. Public Prosecutor with Mr. Manoj Pant : Mr.Brahm S. Nagar For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner/CBI has questioned the order dated 05.06.2012 passed by the Special Judge CBI (P.C. Act) Karkardooma Court: East District, Delhi in RC No.3A/05-ACU-VIII whereby the respondent/Rajinder Prakash Kohli, the then Executive Engineer was discharged on the ground of invalid sanction to prosecute him as the sanction to prosecute was accorded by a person who was not competent for the same.2. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner/CBI that RC No.3A/05-ACU-VIII was registered on 01.02.2005 on source information against accused persons i...
M/S Regent Watch & Jewellery Co Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Itc Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % M/S REGENT WATCH & JEWELLERY CO PVT LTD FAO(OS) 172/2017 Date of decision :14. h September, 2017 Through : Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, ..... Appellant Adv. versus M/S ITC LTD & ORS Through : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Adarsh Aggarwal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Mr. Akram Khan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appellant before us assails an order dated 3rd May, 2017 whereby an application being IA No.18833/2015, filed by the plaintiff/respondent herein praying for the release of an amount deposited by the defendant/appellant herein, was granted.2. It is undisputed that the appellant herein was the licensee of the respondent in a shop in the Shopping Arcade of the ITC Maurya Hotel, Diplomatic Enclave, Sardar Patel Marg, New Delhi under the FAO(OS)No.172/2017 Page 1 of 6 license deed dated 1st July, 2003. The perio...
Jainab & Ors vs.mohd Ashraf
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. 367/2017 & CM No.28639/2017 (for stay) JAINAB & ORS Through: Mr. Pushpender Sehgal, Adv. ........ Petitioners Versus MOHD ASHRAF ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohd. Sajid & Mr. Kiran Bairwa, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER1409.2017 1. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 16th May, 2017 in RC/ARC No.32/2017 of the Court of ACJ/ARC/CCJ, North-East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi]. of eviction of the petitioner owing to the petitioner, though having been served on 18th March, 2017, having filed the leave to defend on 3rd April, 2017 which was the sixteenth day from the date of service.2. On the contention of the counsel for the petitioners that 2nd April, 2017 was a Sunday, the petition was entertained and notice thereof issued.3. 4. The counsel for the respondent appears. The counsel for the respondent appears and has r...
Dr Rajendra Dev Panwar vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
$~20 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14th September, 2017 FAO4032015 DR RAJENDRA DEV PANWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.B. Mohan and Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocates versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Addl. Standing Counsel with Mr.Dhananjay Rana and Ms.Nidhi Raman, Advocate GNCTD for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the impugned judgment dated 14th August, 2015 whereby the Trial Court dismissed the petition for grant of probate of Will dated 5th July, 2005 of late Dr.Rajni Mathur.2. The appellant applied for probate of the Will dated 5th July, 2005 of late Dr. Rajni Mathur, who was working as a Lecturer in the College of Vocational Studies, Delhi University. The appellant was working as a Principal in the aforesaid College. Late Dr.Rajni Mathur expired on 13th April, 2013. The Will dated 5th July, 2005 of late Dr.Rajni Mathur is hand- written and is mainly in Hin...
Rita Sharma vs.b.k. Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h September, 2017 CM(M) 924/2017 & CM No.23685/2016 (for stay) RITA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, Mr. Anuj Soni, Mr. Atin Chadha, Mr. Jugal Bagga and Mr. Deepak Goel, Advs. B.K. SHARMA Versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Suman Arora, Adv. with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition (earlier filed as FAO No.287/2016 under Order XLIII Rule 1(u) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) and ordered on 16th August, 2017 to be converted into a CM(M) petition) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 3rd June, 2016 in RCA No.139/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-1 (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi.2. Notice was issued and the counsel for the respondent has been appearing.3. RCA No.139/2016, wherein the impugned order was made, was preferred by the respondent/defendant against the judgment and decree dated 11th May...
Rahis vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-14-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 11.08.2017 Judgment pronounced on:14. 09.2017 CRL.A. 207/2016 RAFIQUE Through Mr.Aditya Guar, Adv. with Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. + CRL.A. 208/2016 NAZIM ..... Appellant Through Mr.Ritesh Bahri, Adv. with Mr.Vipin Bansal and Mr.Pradeep Prajapati, Advs. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. Crl. Appeals 207/2016, 208/2016, 345/2016, 467/2016 &530/2016 Page 1 of 20 + CRL.A. 345/2016 RAHIS Through Mr.Gaurav Vashistha, Adv. with Mr.Jagdish Chandra, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State with SI Alok Bajpai, P.S. Kashmere Gate. + CRL.A. 467/2016 AZMAL @ ASLAM STATE ..... Appellant Through Mr.Aditya Guar...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »