Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 27 2017

Commissioner of Customs vs.official Liquidator

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2017 Pronounced on :27. h September2017 CO.A(SB) 36/2014 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Amit Bansal and Mr.Akhil Kulshreshtha, Advs. versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.D.Bhattacharya, Adv. for OL Mr.Anand M.Mishra, Adv. for ex- management CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is against an order dated 23rd May, 2014 passed by the Official Liquidator whereby the claim of the customs to an extent of Rs.1,46,06,654/- against the respondent company in liquidation was rejected by the Official Liquidator on the ground that the order dated 10.05.2011 was passed by the custom authorities without informing the Official Liquidator of the proceedings pending before it despite the fact that winding up order was passed in this case on 18.08.2008. Co.A.(SB) No.36/2014 Page 1 of 9 2. The claim of the Customs authorities relate to payment of the c...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Avinash @ Janu vs.lt. Governor of Delhi Through State Govt. Of Nct of ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:28. 08.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:27. 09.2017 W.P(CRL) 1232/2017 AVINASH @ JANU ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Advocate with Mr.Tarunaesh Kumar, Ms.Karuna Nidhar Sherawat, Mr.rohan Sharma and Mr. Anirudha Kumar, Advocates. Rawal, Mr.Deepak versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI THROUGH STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Mr.Sachin Gupta, Advocate along with SI Rajender Singh, PS Malviya Nagar, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) by impugning the order dated 22.03.2017 of the Lt. Governor, Delhi whereby the order dated 10.02.2017 of Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, South District, New Delhi (in short W.P. (Crl.) 1232/2017 Pa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

United India Insurance Company Limitd vs.zile Singh & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~R-279 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL NO.861/2010 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITD Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate Versus ZILE SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The first respondent (the claimant) had instituted accident claim 1. case (Suit No.533/2008) on 29.04.2008, inter alia, against the appellant insurance company (insurer) on the averments that on 12.03.2008 while boarding the bus bearing registration No.DL-1P- 2052 (the bus) at about 5:30 p.m., he had suffered injuries as the driver of the bus (second respondent) had started it with a jerk making him lose balance and consequently falling on the road getting crushed under the wheels of the bus. The bus, admittedly belonged to Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), the third respondent, and was concededly insured against third party risk for the period in ques...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Optimystix Entertainment India P. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.pramod Bajaj & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27thSeptember, 2017 + 1. CRL.M.C. 2297/2017 PRAMOD KUMAR BAJAJ Through: versus... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State THE STATE & ANR + 2. CRL.M.C. 2298/2017 & CRL.M.A.15628-15629/2017 PRAMOD KUMAR BAJAJ & ORS. Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State Inspector Seema Yadav, PS-Prashant Vihar... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS + 3. CRL.M.C. 5371/2014 RAKHEE GUPTA Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR + 4. CRL.M.C. 5372/2014 RAKHEE GUPTA Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.M.C. Nos.2297/2017, 2298/2017, 5371/2014, 5372/2014, 137/2013, 2948/2013, 1298/2013 2013, 3577/2013, ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs.makhan Singh & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~R-280 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h September, 2017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate ..... Appellant + MAC.APP.871/2010 versus MAKHAN SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent, then aged 42 years, earning his livelihood as a rickshaw puller suffered grievous injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 03.02.2007 on account of the negligent driving of a motorcycle bearing registration no.DL-8S-AA-3676 by the second respondent, it being a vehicle registered in the name of the third respondent and admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant / insurance company for the period in question. On his accident claim case (MACT16110/07) instituted on 13.07.2007, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held inquiry and, by judgment dated 12.10.2010, awarded total compensation in the sum of Rs.5,98,855/- directing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Smt. Rukmani Devi vs.s. S. Mota Singh Model School (Senior Secondary)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~31 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8723/2017 Date of Decision:27. September, 2017 SMT. RUKMANI DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kuldeep Gola, Advocate Versus S. S. MOTA SINGH MODEL SCHOOL (SENIOR SECONDARY) Through: Mr.Nakul Sachdeva, Advocate Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition the petitioner seeks that the case titled Rukmani Vs. S.S.Mota Singh Model School (Senior Secondary), Case No.3583/2016 before the Presiding Officer Labour Court-X, Karkardooma Courts Complex be directed to be re-heard and that the order/judgment dated 11.5.2017 in the said case be set aside.2. The proceedings dated 11.5.2017 in ID No.3583/2016, as borne out from the certified copy on the record of the order dated 11.5.2017 indicate that the matter had been settled between the workman and the school, i.e., the petitioner and the respondent herein, wherein the W.P.(C) No.8723/2017 Page 1 of 9 workman had stated that the matter ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Ajmer Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7517/2015 AJMER SINGH Judgment reserved on: August 11, 2017 Judgment delivered on: September 27, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Madhavi Divan, Adv. with Mr. Manan Verma, Mr. R.K. Gupta & Ms. Nidhi Khanna, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Niti Jain, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 3 Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Adv. for R-4 & 5 ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to:-"I) Quash the order dated 24.06.2014 and direct the respondents to give 2nd ACP to the petitioner and pay back the recovered amount of 2nd ACP with 18% interest from the date it has been illegally recovered. II) Direct the respondents to grant MACP to the petitioner w.e.f 01.09.2008 since he has completed 30 years of servi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Sardar Singh vs.l&b Department and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 09.2017/11.09.2017 & 12.09.2017 Pronounced on:27. 09.2017 LPA1732017, C.M. APPL.10119/2017, 10120/2017, 10121/2017 & 10122/2017 RANJEET SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant versus And connected matters: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + LPA3752017 LPA7902013, C.M. APPL.16742/2013 LPA6502016 LPA8962013, C.M. APPL.18674/2013 LPA732014, C.M. APPL.1542/2014 & 1543/2014 LPA742014, C.M. APPL.1544/2014 LPA5002016, C.M. APPL.33048/2016 & 19265/2017 LPA5012016 LPA5042016 LPA5052016 LPA5562016 LPA5582016 LPA5622016 LPA5752016 LPA5762016 LPA5782016 LPA5792016 LPA5802016, C.M. APPL.32818/2017 & 32819/2017 LPA5812016 LPA5822016 LPA5832016 LPA5842016 LPA5902016 LPA5912016 LPA6092016 LPA6102016 LPA6112016 LPA6122016 LPA6132016 LPA6142016 LPA6152016 LPA6172016 LPA1732017 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + LPA6192016 LPA6292016 LPA6312016 LPA6372016 LPA64...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017