Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajpal Singh & Ors . Vs.m/s Indraprastha Builder Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.770/2017 % RAJPAL SINGH & ORS . with Mr. Rahul Advocates. Reserved on:11. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:15. h September, 2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Advocate Shukla, versus M/S INDRAPRASTHA BUILDER PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. Appl. No.32652/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RFA No.770/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.32651/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 1.6.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. RFA No.770/2017 Page 1 of 18 The suit has been dismissed as being barred by the principle of res judicata, inasmuch as, the appellants/plaintiffs claim...
Shyam Sunder vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
$~R-9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: September 15, 2017 CRL.A. 944/2001 SHYAM SUNDER Through: Mr.Awnesh Madhukar, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus STATE Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP ..... Respondent for the State with SI Om Prakash, PS Parliament Street PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant Shyam Sunder has been convicted by the learned Trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 397 IPC for committing the robbery at knife point. He has been sentenced to undergo RI for 7 years and to pay a fine of `500 in default to undergo RI for six months.2. This appeal has been preferred by him challenging his conviction and the sentence awarded to him for committing the offence punishable under Section 397 IPC.3. In brief the prosecution case as narrated in the complaint Ex.PW-3/A is that on 4th July, 2000 the complainant Sh. Shyam Sunder Gupta (PW-3) along with his friend Martin (PW-4) was travelling in bus route no.729. He was carrying `8,000/- in hi...
Afzal Mirza & Ors vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
$~28 * + 1.2. 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2098/2017 AFZAL MIRZA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with SI Saroj, P.S. Dwarka North, Delhi. Mr. Yusuf, Advocate respondent No.2 in person. for R-2 along with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER1509.2017 % Respondent No.2 appears in person. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Saroj. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.0340/2016, registered on 06.07.2016 against them with Police Station Dwarka North, District South-West, Delhi under Sections 498A/406 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. The marriage of th...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.virender Parshad Shah ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
$~R-211 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 373/2010 and CM1109811099/2010 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus Through VIRENDER PARSHAD SHAH & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS 1. The insurance company, on which the liability to pay the compensation in favour of the first to fifth respondent (collectively, the claimants) has been fastened by the judgment dated 01.04.2010 on account of death of Asha in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 28.08.2007, is in appeal to only question the rejection of its defence that there was a breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy in respect of the offending vehicle, it being a three wheeler scooter bearing registration no.DL-1RK-0917 (TSR) concededly insured with it against third party risk, on the contention that the person driving (Khurshid Alam) was not the per...
Bharti Axa General Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.neetu Kadiyan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
$~9 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.341/2017 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga & Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advs. versus NEETU KADIYAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumit Gupta, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. + MAC APPEAL No.490/2017 NEETU KADIYAN & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sumit Gupta, Adv. versus BHARTI AXA GENERAL INS. CO. LTD.& ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga & Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advs. for insurance company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Manish Kadiyan, a practitioner in law, working as Retainer Advocate with KNM & Partners died, at the age of 33 years, in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 08.02.2014 involving negligent MAC Appeal No.341/2017 & conn. Page 1 of 6 driving of Tata Safari bearing registration No.DL8M7734 it admittedly insured against third party risk with Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. insurance company (in...
Sunny vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
$~ 23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.A.No.16SUNNY Through: Mr. S.D. Windlesh, Advocate. Appellant Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..Respondent Through : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER1509.2017 Crl.M.B. No.10(Suspension of Sentence) 1. By way of the present petition filed under Section 389 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as Cr.PC.), the petitioner seeks Suspension of Sentence in case FIR No.125/2011 under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) registered at Police Station Kanjhawala, New Delhi.2. The facts noted by the trial court are as under that on 24/05/2011 the prosecutrix (name withheld being a case U/s 376 IPC) alongwith her mother Kaushal Khatoon and father Mohd. Siraj came to the police station and disclosed about the rape committed upon her on 23/05/2011 at about 8:00 pm. The prosecutrix lives with her parents and six brothers and si...
Mrs Shivani Rajiv Saxena vs.directorate of Enforcement & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
$~45 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1518/2017 Order reserved on 11th September, 2017 Order pronounced on 15th September, 2017 MRS SHIVANI RAJIV SAXENA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Mr. Haresh Jagtiani and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Joshna Samuel, Mr. Manoj Pant and Mr. Rajat Agnihotri, Advs. Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr. Kartik Rai, Mr. Vidur Mohan & Mr. Sahaj Garg, Advs. along with Mr. Naresh Malik, IO (ED) & Mr. Karun (AEO) for respondent No.1 Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for respondent No.2. BAIL APPLN. 1518/2017 Page 1 of 16 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.1. By this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code, for short) read with Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA, for short), petitioner has prayed for grant of bail to h...
Rites Ltd vs.the Additional Director General of Foreign Trade
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7823/2016 RITES LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sameer Nandwani & Mr Shiv Gupta, Advocates. versus THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE Through: Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI. ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 7855/2016 WITH RITES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sameer Nandwani & Mr Shiv versus Gupta, Advocates. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE Through: Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1509.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter 'RITES') has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning two separate orders dated 05.04.2010 (hereafter 'the impugned orders') passed by the respondent (hereafter 'DGFT') imposing penalty on RITES for defaulting in fulfilment of its export obligations. W.P.(C) 7823/2016 & W.P.(C) 7855/2016 Page 1 of 6 RITES was issued advance licence No.0510030107 dated 05.01.2001 for 2,91,540/- and advance licen...
Umed Singh & Ors. Vs.mahipal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
$~R-217 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 423/2010 Decided on:15. h September, 2017 UMED SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi, Advocate with Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus MAHIPAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Kulwant Singh, 20 years old, a bachelor son of the appellants herein, suffered injuries and died in the consequence on account of motor vehicular accident that took place on 21.05.2007 involving negligent driving of tempo bearing registration No.DL-1LD-6397, by first respondent, admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question. The appellants had instituted accident claim case (Petition No.795/2009) on 07.07.2007 seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 20.03.2010, upheld the case, returning finding that...
Surender Singh & Ors. Vs.kanwaljeet Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : September 15th, 2017 RFA62007 SURENDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Singh Gurjar, Advocate. versus KANWALJEET KAUR ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants against the judgment and decree dated 27.10.2006 passed by the learned filed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit respondent/plaintiff the appellants/defendants. for damages has been decreed against The facts enumerating from the record are that an application 2. under Order 33 Rule 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC was filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.6,00,000/- on account of damages caused by theft and rioting by the appellants/defendants. It was alleged that the respondent/plaintiff was living at RZ-101, Ravi Nagar Extension, near Tilak Nagar, Village Khyala, New Delhi. On 26.05.1997 at about 12.30 in the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »