Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sourabh Sharma & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1507/2017 SOURABH SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Tanya Mahajan, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC for State with SI Anju Tyagi, PS Hari Nagar, Delhi. Ms.Sumedha Arya, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER1809.2017 % Respondent No.2 is present in person. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Anju Tyagi. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.1174/2015, registered on 22.08.2015 against them with Police Station Hari Nagar, West District, Delhi, under Sections 498A/406/354/354(A)/34 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. The marriage of the petitioner no.1 with the ...
Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd vs.sumitra Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~R-222 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 446/2010 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate Versus SUMITRA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for R-1 to R-5. Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate with Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocate for R-6 & R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (MACT No.796/2008/07) was instituted on 03.11.2007 by first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants) seeking compensation on account of death of Azad Singh in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 21.09.2007 at about 6:45 a.m., due to negligent driving of Tata truck bearing registration No.HR-63-1592 (the truck), admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer) for the period in question. The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 07.05.2010, accepted the said claim for compensation ...
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs.the Micro and Small Enterprises Fa ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. 09.2017 W.P.(C) 10886/2016 and CM No.42638/2016 % + BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED versus ........ Petitioner THE MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATIONS CENTRE & ANR ..... Respondent + W.P.(C) 10901/2016 and CM No.42707/2016 AND BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED versus ........ Petitioner THE MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATIONS CENTRE & ANR ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Ashim Vachher, Mr P. Piyush and Mr Vaibhav Dabas. : Mr Siddharth Dutta for R-1. Mr Vikram Nandrajog and Mr S. Khanna for R CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (hereafter the BHEL) has filed these petitions, challenging two separate orders (hereafter the impugned orders), both dated 16.06.2016, passed by the respondent no.1, The Micro W.P.(C) 10886/2016 & 10901/2016 Page 1 of 17 and Small Enterprises Facilitations Cent...
K K Chakraborty vs.m/s. Alankit Assignments Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :06. h September, 2017 Date of decision :18. h September, 2017 W.P.(C) 7859/2017 K K CHAKRABORTY ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate versus M/S. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA Nemo. ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned Award dated 28.01.2017 in I.D. No.5252/2016 whereby vide the impugned Award dated 28.01.2017, the reference sent by the Government of NCT of Delhi vide Order No.F.24(39)/Lab./CD/14/217 dated 19.06.2014 to the effect that : - Whether the services of Sh. K.K. Chakraborty S/o Sh. H.L. Chakraborty have been illegally and/or unjustifiably by the management; and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect?. terminated was answered to the effect that Sh. K.K. Chakkraborty i.e. the W.P.(C) 7859/2017 Page 1 of 14 petitioner herein was a workman fall...
Rajesh Sharma vs.bses Yamuna Power Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~13 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on :18. h September, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5617/2015 RAJESH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Naman Saraswant, proxy counsel for BSES/R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT Instant petition has come to be filed seeking directions to the respondent no.1-BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. to install an electricity connection in a portion on the ground floor of property being No.198/3A, Sri Ram Nagar, Shahdara, Delhi. What is the extent of the portion of the property in occupation of the petitioner, prayer (i) avers, as follows : issue direction/writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondent no.1 to install the electricity connection in the premises under occupation of the petitioner." 2.... Petitioner claims to be in occupation as a tenant having been so inducted by one Ms. Santo Devi, who expired intestate ...
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs.m/s Capital Control India pvt.ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:18. 09.2017 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 1/2017 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. . Decree Holder. Through: Mr.R.Chandrachud, Advocate versus M/s CAPITAL CONTROL INDIA PVT.LTD Judgment Debtor Through: Mr.Dilip Taur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Sections 29A, (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), seeking to extend the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator for passing of the Award.2. It is the case of the petitioner that on 14.1.2008, the petitioner issued a purchase order to the respondent for supply and also for supervision of erection, testing and commissioning of an Electro Chlorination System for 4 X125MW Units at Kosti TPP, Sudan.3. The disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner on 4.01.2016, in terms of the arbitration clause, appointed Mr. Vipin Chandra, Retd. A.G.M.(Law), BHEL...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.shama & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~14 to 16 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 107/2017 and CM APPL.4193/2017 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate with Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate versus SABRA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Advocate with Mr. Alok K. Palai, Advocate + MAC.APP. 109/2017 and CM APPL.4260/2017 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate with Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate versus GULBAHAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Advocate with Mr. Alok K. Palai, Advocate + MAC.APP. 113/2017 and CM APPL.4409/2017 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate with Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate versus SHAMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.M. Zulfiqar Alam, Advocate with Ms. Ranny, Advocate MAC A1072016 etc. Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE ...
Ramesh Chand Jain vs.the New India Assurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~1, 13 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 742/2017 Decided on:18. h September, 2017 GOPAL .... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vijay Singh and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates for R-1 + MAC.APP. 1110/2016 and CM479712016 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vijay Singh and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates versus GOPAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates for R-1 + MAC.APP. 197/2017 RAMESH CHAND JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. versus MAC A74217, 11& 197/2017 Page 1 of 4 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vijay Singh and Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocates for R-1 Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Insurer (appellant in MACA11102016), and the claimant (appel...
Yogender Kumar vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~24. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.10448/2016 Date of decision:18. h September, 2017 YOGENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC alongwith Mr. Waize Ali Noor and Vivek Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): C.M. No.33644/2017 We are not inclined to recall our order dated 16th August, 2017 closing the right of the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit. Counter affidavit, it is noticed, was filed on 28th April, 2017. We also notice that the petitioner has not filed a copy of the rejoinder affidavit even with the application seeking permission to file rejoinder affidavit. The application is dismissed. W.P. (C) No.10448/2016 Page 1 of 4 WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.10448/2016 The petitioner is a Constable in Central Reserve Police Force. He impugns transfer/movement orde...
Mahesh Kumar Yadav vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:18. h September, 2017 W.P. (C.) No.11415/2016 MAHESH KUMAR YADAV ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Lakshay Sawhney, Adv. with versus Mr.Aditya Shandilya, Adv. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Mananjay Kr. Mishra & Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advs. for Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel, NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue his vending activity from the site shown in the plan Annexure P-2 and also to include the name of the petitioner in the survey of existing street vendors as per his seniority.2. The petitioner claims to be a regular squatter and was squatting near Indian Oil Building, Janpath Lane, New Delhi.3. The main thrust of the ar...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »