Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Icici Lombard Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.usha & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~R-219 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.426/2010 ICICI LOMBARD GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant USHA & ORS. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The tribunal by judgment dated 07.04.2010 on accident claim case (suit No.082/2009) of the first to fourth respondents (claimants) awarded compensation in the total amount of Rs. 9,35,376/- directing the appellant insurance company (insurer) to pay with interest @ 7.5% per annum on account of death of Sanjay Kumar in motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 12.12.2008 at about 2:45AM involving negligent driving of Toyota Qualis bearing registration No.HR55 5576, admittedly insured with the appellant insurance company (insurer) for the period in question. The amount of compensation included Rs. 8,45,376/- towards loss of dependency besides Rs. 25,000/- towards funeral expenses, Rs. 50,000...
Madhu Singh vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. h September, 2017 + BAIL APPLN. 1968/2016 MADHU SINGH ..... Applicant Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Advocate with Mr. Hemant Gulati and Mr. V.K Gulati with applicant present in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma APP for State, with Inspector Ramesh K. Singh, P.S. Mandir Marg for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 This is the Second Regular Bail Application moved by the Applicant in this Court under Section 439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the case FIR No.56/2009 dated 15.04.2009, under Sections 406/409/420/201/120-B/174-A IPC, registered at Police Station- Economic Offences Wing, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. BAIL APPLN. 1968/2016 Page 1 of 12 2. In the instant petition, the applicant is in judicial custody since 16.07.2014 and the charge sheet has been filed in the learned Trial Court on 03.09.2011.3. The brief fact...
Randeep Kaur vs.ayush Sibal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision :18. 09.2017 + W.P. (CRL.) 2008/2017 RANDEEP KAUR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate with Ms. Preeti, Advocate versus AYUSH SIBAL Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Code) seeking speedy trial of the Complaint Case No.6333filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (in short NI Act).2. The petitioner filed a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act against the respondent. Cognizance of this complainant was taken by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate-02 Karkardooma Court vide order dated 29.04.2014. WP (Crl.) 2008/2017 Page 1 of 7 3. Pursuant to the order dated 18.07.2017 of this court, a report dated 23.08.2017 has been received from concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.4. Learn...
Rohit Goswami vs.ministry of External Affairs and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. 09.2017 + W.P.(C) 7706/2016 ROHIT GOSWAMI versus MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS AND ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For theRespondents CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Mr Karan S. Thukral, Mr Rohit Yadav. :Mr Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr Saakshi Aggarwal and Mr Mohita, Advocate Govt. Pleader-UOI. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the decision of the respondents to revoke the petitioner's passport under Section 10(3)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967 (hereafter 'the Act'). The petitioner's passport was cancelled by a communication dated 25.04.2016 (hereafter 'the impugned order') principally on the ground that the petitioner had failed to respond to the show cause notice within the extended time as provided to him. The petitioner contends that revocation of his passport is without following t...
Ram Mohan vs.anil Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
* % + RAM MOHAN ANIL KUMAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h September, 2017 CM(M) No.1039/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Harjika, Adv. Versus Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM No.34159/2017 (for exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1039/2017 & CM No.34158/2017 (for stay) 3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 15th July, 2017 in Civil Suit No.417/2014 (New No.614927/2016) of the Court of Additional District Judge-08 (ADJ), Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. allowing the application of respondent / plaintiff, filed after hearing of final arguments, for amendment of the plaint in the suit for specific performance of Agreement to Sell, to also include therein the relief, in the alternative, of recovery of double of the bayana amount with interest.4. The impugned order, after allowing th...
Bishan Sarup and Ors vs.registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~14 to 16 (Common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI204502017 + W.P.(C) 2711/2013 & C.M. Nos.10310/2014, 40873/2016, BISHAN SARUP AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Advocate. versus REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Shryan Das, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Rajat Aneja & Ms. Vandana Aneja, Advocates for R-3 to 13. Mr. Sunil Sabharwal, SC, DCHFL/R-14. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for R-15. + W.P.(C) 5905/2013 & C.M. Nos.13024/2013, 25265/2017 WITH BISHAN SARUP & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Advocate. versus W.P.(C) 2711/2013 REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Shryan Das, Advocate for R-1. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Rajat Aneja & Ms. Vandana Aneja, Advocates for R-3 to 13. Page 1 of 5 + W.P.(C) 6856/2013 & C.M. Nos.14859/2013, 25262/2017 AND GIRISH CHANDRA SIRKECK ........ Petiti...
Sunstar Overseas Ltd. Vs.thai Airways International Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~R-28A * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA412007 SUNSTAR OVERSEAS LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr.B.R. Sharma, Adv. versus THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sanjay Gupta, Ms.Bhavna Dhami and Mr.Ajay Pratap Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI % ORDER (ORAL) 18.09.2017 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent for the recovery against the appellant/defendant was decreed, the present appeal has been preferred.2. The facts enumerating from the plaint filed before the Court below are that the plaintiff/respondent is a company which operates in Delhi and is carrying on the business of air transport i.e carriage of passengers and cargo in various parts of the world. Appellant/ defendant is a limited company. The defendant No.2 has a unit called A.T Travels which is carrying on the business as cargo agents. The defend...
Neeru Garg & Ors. Vs.national Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.268/2017 NEERU GARG & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ansuman Bal, Adv. versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Jeevan Ram Garg, 37 years old, earning his livelihood from business, suffered injuries in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 31.05.2012 at about 12:30PM due to negligent driving of tractor bearing registration No.UK08 7314, admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the first respondent (insurer) and died in the consequence. His wife and the father, they being the appellants (claimants), instituted accident claim case (suit No.4863/2016) on 05.07.2012 seeking compensation. The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 03.09.2016, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 17,65,000/-, directing the insurer to pay with...
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner vs.m/s Kangan Security Servi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :12. h September 2017 Date of decision :18. h September , 2017 W.P.(C) 8053/2017 + W.P.(C) 8053/2017 THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Prem Prakash, Adv. ..... Respondent versus M/S KANGAN SECURITY SERVICE CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA Through Nemo. JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.CM APPL. 33154/2017 This is an application seeking exemption from filing certified copies of annexures. The application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 33155/2017 This is an application seeking condonation of 137 days in re- filing the petition. The said application is allowed and delay of 137 days in re-filing the petition is condoned in view of the reasons mentioned in the application. W.P.(C) 8053/2017 Page 1 of 14 W.P.(C) 8053/2017 1. The petitioner i.e. the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Delhi (North) {hereinafter referred to as APFC (N)} vide the present petition under Arti...
Prabhat Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~19 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. 09.2017 W.P.(CRL) 1872/2017 PRABHAT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Puneett Singhal, Adv. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with SI Davinder Kumar, PS SIU/Crime Branch, Kotwali. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) 1.2. 3. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the issuance of writ of mandamus to release him on parole. Status report has been filed. It is submitted that the petitioner was ordered to be released on parole by the competent authority vide order No.F.18/333/2014/ HOME(G)/2466 dated 27th April, 2017 for a period of four weeks, subject to certain terms and conditions including that he shall be released only after the surrender of the other co- accused, who is on parole. WP (Crl.) 1872/2017 Page 1 of 3 4.5. 6. The learn...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »