Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Company Limited vs.mamta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 737/2016 and CM APPL.32853/2016 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus MAMTA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Indu Aggarwal proxy counsel for Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate for R-1 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The tribunal, by its judgment dated 10.06.2016, in accident claim case (MACT Case No.451126/2016, Old No.287/2015) instituted by the first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants) awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.31,51,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum, on account of death of Vishal, in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 27.04.2011, due to negligent driving of Maruti Esteem car, bearing registration No.DL-6CA-3643, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer) for the period in question. MAC A7372016 Page 1 of 3 2. It may...
Ram Singh vs.umesh Prasad Yadav & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~R-226 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 471/2010 Decided on:19. h September, 2017 RAM SINGH Through: None ..... Appellant versus UMESH PRASAD YADAV & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) in accident claim case (petition no.295/2006) instituted on 30.01.2001, which was decided by judgment dated 04.03.2010 with award of Rs.20,000/- having been granted, the liability to pay having been fastened on the first and second respondents, they having been described as the driver and registered owner respectively of the car bearing registration no.DL- 1CE-6618.2. The appellant presses for enhancement of the award of compensation.3. It is noted that though both the respondents had been served, only second respondent appeared through counsel in response. The appeal was admitted and put in the category of regulars, to come up MAC Appeal No....
Rohit Sehrawat vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~31 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 09.2017 W.P.(CRL) 2579/2017 ROHIT SEHRAWAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Advocate with Mr.Vijay Kasana, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for the State with SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Sultan Puri, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court 1. under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to grant him parole for a period of four weeks on the ground that his father has to undergo cataract surgery which was earlier scheduled on 28.04.2017 and is now re- scheduled on 22.09.2017.2. Status report has been filed.3. As per status report, copy of the Medical Certificate issued by Medical Officer of Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Delhi has been verified and found to be correct. It is mentioned that the cataract surge...
Afsana vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~12&13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:19. h September, 2017 + CRL.A. 72/2014 + AFSANA STATE CRL.A. 102/2014 Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey & ..... Appellant Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates. Versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent NOOR MOHAMMAD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Azhar Qayum, Advocate. STATE Versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Both the appeals have been heard together with the consent of the parties. Arguments have been addressed by the learned counsel for the parties and the same are being disposed of by a common judgment. CRL. Appeal No.72/2014 & 102/2014 Page 1 of 17 2. Both the appeals have been filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the judgment dated 20.04.2013 by which the appellant Noor Mohammed has been held guilty for the offence under S...
Vijay Nagar vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
* I N THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI Reserved on:03. d August, 2017 Delivered on:18. h September, 2017 % + TEST. CAS. 79/2012 VIJAY NAGAR STATE & ORS. Versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Mohan and Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocates For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. D.P. Kaushik, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGEMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for grant of Letter of Administration in respect of Will and Testament dated 07.08.1997 of late Sh. Banarasi Dass Sharma.2. 3. Shri Banarasi Dass Sharma expired on 26.12.2009. At the time of his demise, late Sh. Banarasi Dass Sharma was permanent resident of A-6/170A Janta Flats, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi. TEST. CAS. 79/2012 Page 1 of 8 4. Shri Banarasi Dass Sharma is stated to have left immoveable property situated at New Delh...
Neelkantham Systems Pvt. Ltd vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~30 & 31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2047/2017 ANUJ RANA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. A.K. Prasad and Ms.Priyanka Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue with Mr.Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. AND W.P.(C) 2053/2017 NEELKANTHAM SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. A.K. Prasad and Ms.Priyanka Goel, Advocates. 31 + versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Senior Standing Counsel for Revenue with Mr.Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % ORDER1809.2017 Prathiba M. Singh, J.:1. The short question that arises in these two writ petitions is whether the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission W.P.(C) Nos. 2047/2017 & 2053/2017 Page 1 of 12 (hereinafter referred to as the Settlement Commission) was right in rejecting the applications filed by the... Petitioners (...
Nutan Chadha & Ors. Vs.mukesh Chander Saini & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % NUTAN CHADHA & ORS. versus RFA No.797/2017 18th September, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate. MUKESH CHANDER SAINI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. Nos. 34210/2017 & 34212/2017 (for exemptions) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. C.M. Appl. Nos. 34208/2017 & 34211/2017 These are applications seeking condonation of delay of 80 days in filing the appeal and 46 days in re-filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the applications the same are allowed and the delays of filing and re-filing the appeal are condoned. C.Ms. stand disposed of. RFA No.797/2017 Page 1 of 10 RFA No.797/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.34209/2017 (for stay) 1. This regular first appeal under Section 96 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment of the trial court dated 22.12....
Girish Chandra Sirkeck vs.registrar of Co-Operative Societies & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~14 to 16 (Common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI204502017 + W.P.(C) 2711/2013 & C.M. Nos.10310/2014, 40873/2016, BISHAN SARUP AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Advocate. versus REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Shryan Das, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Rajat Aneja & Ms. Vandana Aneja, Advocates for R-3 to 13. Mr. Sunil Sabharwal, SC, DCHFL/R-14. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for R-15. + W.P.(C) 5905/2013 & C.M. Nos.13024/2013, 25265/2017 WITH BISHAN SARUP & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Advocate. versus W.P.(C) 2711/2013 REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Mr. Shryan Das, Advocate for R-1. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Rajat Aneja & Ms. Vandana Aneja, Advocates for R-3 to 13. Page 1 of 5 + W.P.(C) 6856/2013 & C.M. Nos.14859/2013, 25262/2017 AND GIRISH CHANDRA SIRKECK ........ Petiti...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.sabra & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
$~14 to 16 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 107/2017 and CM APPL.4193/2017 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate with Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate versus SABRA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Advocate with Mr. Alok K. Palai, Advocate + MAC.APP. 109/2017 and CM APPL.4260/2017 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate with Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate versus GULBAHAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Advocate with Mr. Alok K. Palai, Advocate + MAC.APP. 113/2017 and CM APPL.4409/2017 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate with Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate versus SHAMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.M. Zulfiqar Alam, Advocate with Ms. Ranny, Advocate MAC A1072016 etc. Page 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE ...
Vodafone Mobile Services Limited vs.bhoopender Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA Nos.798/2017 & 799/2017 + % 1. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED RFA No.798/2017 18th September, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Aakansha Kapoor, Advocate. versus BHOOPENDER SINGH2 RFA No.799/2017 ..... Respondent VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Aakansha Kapoor, Advocate. versus BHOOPENDRA SINGH CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.34247/2017 (for condonation of delay of 527 days) in RFA No.798/2017 1. By the impugned judgment, the trial court has decreed the suit for a sum of Rs.3,15,226/- along with interest at 12% per annum RFA Nos.798/2017 & 799/2017 Page 1 of 6 on account of work which the respondent/plaintiff is said to have done for the appellant/defendant with respect to communication lines laid down for Meerut-Shamli OFC route.2. No doubt, dela...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »