Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Girendra Pandit vs.south Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:19. h September, 2017 W.P. (C.) No.7423/2017 GIRENDRA PANDIT ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Rani Chhabra, Adv. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR Through Ms.Manorma Masih, Adv. for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS along with Mr.Vinod Kumar, Licensing Inspector, SDMC, in person. Mr.Deeptakirti Verma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking an appropriate writ, order or direction to declare the action of the respondents in removing the petitioner from the site, i.e. Mahavir Ahinsa Sthal, Lado Sarai, M.G. Road, Mehrauli, Delhi, as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014.2. The petitioner claims to be a regular squatter. It is contended by Ms.Rani Chhabra, learn...
Sh. N. C. Jain vs.m/s S. N. G. Developers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:12. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:19. h September, 2017 + CO.PET. 741/2014, and CA No.2747/2014, 2724/2016 SH. N. C. JAIN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Preetjeet Singh and Mr.Anis Ur Rehman, Advocates. versus M/S S. N. G. DEVELOPERS LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Mr.S.K.Tiwary, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The respondent company is primarily engaged in the business of developers, colonizers, real estate developers and construction. It has its projects in Greater Noida, Dharuhera and Firozabad, Uttar Pradesh.2. The petitioner was appointed as Deputy General Manager (Finance) by the respondent company vide appointment letter dated 01.09.2006 with a salary of `40,000/- per month. Since the overall performance of the petitioner was good as he worked with devotion, sincerity and patience, he was given increment in his salary with effect from 01.09.2007 and it was increased to CO.PET. No...
Prince Chahal vs.director General Border Security Force and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1052/2017 Date of decision:19. h September, 2017 PRINCE CHAHAL ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Sriparna Chatterjee and Mr.Soumitra Chatterjee, Advs. Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Satya Prakash Singh and Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) The petitioner, Prince Chahal, having cleared the Central Armed Police Force (CAPFs) Examination-2015, was selected for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector in the Border Security Force (BSF).2. The offer of appointment letter dated 03.10.2016 had required the petitioner to report to the Director, BSF Academy, Tekanpur, Gwalior (M.P) by 21.11.2016. Paragraph 11 had warned that failure to join the Academy on 21.11.2016 would result in automatic cancellation. WP(C) 1052/2017 Page 1 3. It is the case of the petitioner tha...
M/S Homeland Buildwell Private. Ltd. Vs.shri Sunil Sood
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. 09.2017 ARB.P. 468/2017 M/S HOMELAND BUILDWELL PRIVATE. LTD. ........ Petitioner versus SHRI SUNIL SOOD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate : Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Srivastava, Mr. Pradeep Chhindra and Mr. Aditya Bakshi, Advocates CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arising out of Collaboration Agreement dated 11.08.2006 executed between the parties.2. As per the petitioner, respondent had approached the petitioner seeking finance for purchase of land in Baddi in the State of Himachal Pradesh for the purposes of development and construction of ARB.P. 468/2017 Page 1 of 3 M...
Jaideep Narang vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 31, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: September 19, 2017 CRL.A. 441/2001 JAIDEEP NARANG ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ajay Burman, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Sadhvi Gaur, Ms.Tanya Harnal & Mr.Harsit Khurana, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Sazesh Khan PS Subzi Mandi CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT1 Case FIR No.185/1991 was registered at PS Subzi Mandi on the basis of statement made by Smt.Kiran Narang (deceased). Initially the FIR was registered under Section 498-A/306 IPC, however after the death of Smt.Kiran Narang, the FIR was converted into Section 498-A/304-B/34 IPC. The chargesheet was filed against four accused persons namely O.P.Narang (father-in-law), Rita Narang (mother-in- law), Jaideep Narang (husband) and Vineet Narang @ Babbu (brother- in-law/devar). CRL.A. No.441/2001 Page 1 of 21 2. Vide impugned judgment dated 23rd May, 2001 whi...
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co Ltd vs.jagat Prasad & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 630/2012 and CM103292012 ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta for Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate ..... Appellant versus JAGAT PRASAD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for R-1 to 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Mahender Pal died on account of the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 12.06.2010 due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as trailor, bearing registration no.HR-55J-8155 (offending vehicle), by Ramesh (seventh respondent), it being a vehicle registered in the name of Amit A. Bamb (eighth respondent) and admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer). The first to sixth respondents (collectively the claimants) instituted accident claim case (MACT13611/10) on 13.08.2010 seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor V...
Tenzin Peldon vs.telemart Communication India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~R-231 & 233 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.514/2010 & CM No.13977/2010 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE. CO. LTD Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. . Appellant versus TENZIN PELDON & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Kohli, Adv. for R-1. + MAC APPEAL No.593/2010 TENZIN PELDON ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Kohli, Adv. versus TELEMART COMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) On 28.02.2004, four persons were moving in car bearing 1. registration No.DL4 AB0735(the car) driven by Nitesh Gupta (respondent in these appeals), it being registered in the name of Telemart Communication (India) Pvt. Ltd. (another respondent in these appeals), it admittedly being insured against third party risk with MAC Appeal No.514/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 7 IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. (appellant in MAC Appeal No.514/2010. The pas...
Rajesh vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
$~15, 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL. L.P. 267/2016 RAJESH STATE & ORS Date of Judgment:19. h September, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Mohan, Mr. Tejasva Mehra and Mr. Lakshya Gupta, Advocates versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State along with SI Sandeep P.S. Sarita Vihar. Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Amicus Curiae for respondents no.2 and 3. + CRL.L.P. 297/2016 & Crl.M.As.8690-8691/2016 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State along with SI Sandeep P.S. Sarita Vihar. versus RAVI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Amicus Curiae for respondents no.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR Crl. L.P.Nos.267/2016 & 297/2016 Page 1 of 22 G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 8084/2016(delay) in Crl.L.P. 267/2016 1. By this application, the petitioner seeks condonation of 35 days delay in filing the leave to appeal.2. For...
Nathu Ram Through Lrs. Vs.m/s Scindia Potteries & Services Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.225/2017 + % NATHU RAM THROUGH LRS. Reserved on:15. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:19. h September, 2017 ..... Appellants Mr. R.R. Jangu, Advocate. Through: versus M/s SCINDIA POTTERIES & SERVICES PVT. LTD. ....Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. No.33594/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.33592/2017 (condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 15 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.33593/2017 (condonation of delay) 3. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 387 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. RSA No.225/2017 Page 1 of 10 C.M. stands disposed of. RSA No.225/2017 and C.M. No.33595/2017 (stay) 4. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants i...
Lallan Shah vs.indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % LALLAN SHAH RFA No.791/2017 19th September, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Satender Kumar Garg, Advocate. versus INDRAPRASTHA POWER GENERATION CO. LTD. & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.33787/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RFA No.791/2017 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 9.6.2017 whereby the trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs.10,50,511/- along with interest filed by the appellant/plaintiff. The earnest money RFA No.791/2017 Page 1 of 12 deposit of the appellant/plaintiff was of the sum of Rs.11,72,495/- with the respondent No.1/defendant No.1 and with respect to goods as the appellant/plainti...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »