Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tumul Jain vs.reliance Infratel Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 09.2017 % + ARB.P. 496/2017 TUMUL JAIN RELIANCE INFRATEL LTD versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vivekanand, Adv. : Mr. Rohit Jain, Adv..... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2009.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.2. The petitioner claims to be owner of the subject property, part of which was licenced to the respondent for installation of a Cellular and microwave antenna and other related equipments and silent generator etc.3. License Agreement dated 07.11.2006 was executed between the ARB. PET.496 /2017 Page 1 of 3 parties. The terms of the licence which was initially for a period of 5 years was extended for a further period of 5 years.4. As ...
Upsrtc vs.zahir Hussain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~R-236 to R-238 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.541/2010 UPSRTC PARVEEN Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant Garima Prashad, Adv. versus Through: None. ..... Respondent + MAC APPEAL No.584/2010 UPSRTC Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant Garima Prashad, Adv. versus ZAHIR HUSSAIN Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.590/2010 ..... Respondent UPSRTC Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant versus Garima Prashad, Adv. MASTER SHANNE ALI ..... Respondent Through: None. MAC Appeal No.541/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondents in these three connected appeals were travelling together in van bearing registration No.DL3M0771(the van) from Delhi to Bareilly on the night of 14.10.2003. It is stated that at about 0430 hours in the area between Shahjaad Nagar and Gharora in UP, the van developed some mechanical problem due to which it had to be parked...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.mithlesh Tiwari & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~R-240 & R-241 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.604/2010 + MAC APPEAL No.2/2011 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus MITHLESH TIWARI & ORS. Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vinod Kumar Tiwari was riding motorcycle on 08.07.2008 when he came to be involved in a collision with bus bearing registration No.DL-1P-6841 (the bus) driven by the seventh respondent (Satish Kumar), it being a vehicle registered in the name of the eighth respondent (Yudhisthar). He suffered injuries and died in the consequence. His wife and other members of the family dependent on him, they being first to sixth respondents (collectively, the claimants), instituted accident claim case (Suit No.01/2009) on 13.10.2008 seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, on the averments that the accident ha...
Archana Shastri vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. h September, 2017 + W.P.(C) 1558/2017 ARCHANA SHASTRI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Goel, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Harsh Pandit, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Pratap Shanker, Mr. Swetank Shantanu and Ms. A. Shivani, Adv. + W.P.(C) 1559/2017 D.K. BATRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Goel, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Harsh Pandit, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Pratap Shanker, Mr. Swetank Shantanu and Ms. A. Shivani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI WP(C) Nos.1558/2017 & 1559/2017 Page 1 of 14 REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petitions are disposed of by this common order since the same involve identical facts and issues. For the sake of convenience and brevity, facts in W.P.(C) 1558/2017 are being noted.2. W.P.(C) 1558/2017 assails order...
Gtm Builders & Promoters Pvtltd vs.sneh Developers Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~16 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 20, 2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 10/2016 & I.A.6379/2016 GTM BUILDERS & PROMOTERS PVTLTD ....... Petitioner Through: Dr.Amit George, Advocate with Mr.Jai Sahai Endlaw & Mr.J.V. Rana, Advs. versus SNEH DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr.H.S.Kohli, Mr.Amit and Mr.Avinash Sharma, Advocates. Sherawat, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) I.A.4720/2017 1. This application is filed under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151CPC on behalf of petitioner for amending the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as The Act). O.M.P. (COMM) 10/2016 & I.A.6379/2016 Page 1 of 5 2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Act challenging the impugned arbitral award dated 01.08.2015. After passing of the award, the petitioner is said to have filed on 19.10.2015 objections u...
Prithvi Nath Pandey vs.moti Lal Nehru College & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on: September 15, 2017 Order delivered on: September 20, 2017 + W.P.(C) 1164/2014 PRITHVI NATH PANDEY Through: In person versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS MOTI LAL NEHRU COLLEGE & ORS. Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia & Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Mr. Santos Kumar, Adv. with Mr. Abhinav Sharma & Mr. Shikhar Saha, Advs. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER V. KAMESWAR RAO, J CM No.20317/2015 1. This is an application filed by the petitioner for restoration of the petition, which was withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner on August 7, 2015.2. This court while issuing notice on this application on March 31, 2016 noted the contents of the application and observed that the petitioner apart from seeking recall of order dated August 7, 2015 is praying that the writ petition be heard on merit to serve the ends of justice. It is the case of the petitioner / applic...
Elcee Plastic Industries & Ors. Vs.harkishan Dass (Since Deceased) Thr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.228/2017 + % ELCEE PLASTIC INDUSTRIES & ORS. 20th September, 2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. A.K.Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sudhir Sukhija, Mr. Shivam Garg and Mr. Rama Shankar, Advocates Versus HARKISHAN DASS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH ITS LRs. Through: Mr. Ajay Gupta ........ RESPONDENTS and Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 7.6.2014 and the first appellate court dated 7.6.2017; by which the suit for possession filed by the respondents/plaintiffs with respect to the tenanted premises being land comprised in Plot No.21, Friends RSA No.228/2017 Page 1 of 16 Colony, Krishna Nagar, Khasra No.1126/347-370 in Village Jhilmil Tahirpur, G.T.Road, Shahdara...
Upsrtc vs.parveen
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~R-236 to R-238 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.541/2010 UPSRTC PARVEEN Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant Garima Prashad, Adv. versus Through: None. ..... Respondent + MAC APPEAL No.584/2010 UPSRTC Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant Garima Prashad, Adv. versus ZAHIR HUSSAIN Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.590/2010 ..... Respondent UPSRTC Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant versus Garima Prashad, Adv. MASTER SHANNE ALI ..... Respondent Through: None. MAC Appeal No.541/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondents in these three connected appeals were travelling together in van bearing registration No.DL3M0771(the van) from Delhi to Bareilly on the night of 14.10.2003. It is stated that at about 0430 hours in the area between Shahjaad Nagar and Gharora in UP, the van developed some mechanical problem due to which it had to be parked...
Santosh Kumar Yadav vs.mukesh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~R-239 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.560/2010 SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocate for Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate versus MUKESH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 12.10.2006 at about 7:50 p.m. due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.DL-1PB-3729, admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question. His right arm above elbow was amputated and he was rendered permanently disabled, such conditions having been certified by board of doctors (vide Ex.PW-1/21) to be eighty four per cent (84%) in relation to the said right upper limb. On his claim petition (Suit No.13/09/06) instituted on 30.10.2006, the tribunal after inquiry, by judgment dated 11.07.200...
Vodafone India Ltd & Ors vs.telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 09.2017 Pronounced on:20. 09.2017 LPA5922017, CAV8092017, CM Nos.33165-33166/2017 VODAFONE INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.P. Chidambram, Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Manjul Bajpai, Dr.Shashwat Bajpai, Ms.Akriti Shashank, Mr.Sharad Agrawal, Advocates versus TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with Mr.Kirtiman, Mr.Prateek Dhanda, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr.Vikram Aditya Singh and Mr.Adit Khurana, Advs. for TRAI Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Biju Raman, Mr.Raghav Shankar, Mr.Jayant Malik, Mr.Tushar Bhardwaj, Mr.Vishnu Sharma, Mr.Nakul Nayak, Advs. for Applicant in CM No.33997/2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % LPA No.592/2017 Page 1 of 21 Facts 1. Vodafone India Limited ("Vodafone" or "appellant") appeals the decision of a learned Single Judge of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »