Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Upsrtc vs.master Shanne Ali
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~R-236 to R-238 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.541/2010 UPSRTC PARVEEN Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant Garima Prashad, Adv. versus Through: None. ..... Respondent + MAC APPEAL No.584/2010 UPSRTC Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant Garima Prashad, Adv. versus ZAHIR HUSSAIN Through: None. + MAC APPEAL No.590/2010 ..... Respondent UPSRTC Through: Mr. Shadab Khan for Ms. ..... Appellant versus Garima Prashad, Adv. MASTER SHANNE ALI ..... Respondent Through: None. MAC Appeal No.541/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondents in these three connected appeals were travelling together in van bearing registration No.DL3M0771(the van) from Delhi to Bareilly on the night of 14.10.2003. It is stated that at about 0430 hours in the area between Shahjaad Nagar and Gharora in UP, the van developed some mechanical problem due to which it had to be parked...
Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.haseena Khatoon & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.617/2011 and CM APPL.12406/2011 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate ..... Appellant versus HASEENA KHATOON & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pankhi, Advocate for R-1 to R-10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The tribunal while deciding accident claim case (suit No.472/2009) of first to eighth respondents (collectively, claimants), by judgment dated 08.04.2011, awarded compensation in their favour on account of death of Mohd. Hakim, in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 01.09.2009 due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration no.HR-38N-3626, fastening the liability on the appellant insurance company (insurer), it admittedly having issued the insurance cover for third party risk in its respect, but granted it recovery rights against the insured (the registered owner), twelfth resp...
Raj Kumar Anand vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8119/2015 Date of Decision:20. h September,2017 RAJ KUMAR ANAND ........ Petitioner Through:... Petitioner-in-person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Mr.Rishabh Sahu, Advocate for UOI. Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC with Mr.Rizwan, Adv. for R-2,5 & 6. Rajesh Mr.Kumar Advocate for R-7 & 8. Dr. Virendra, Pairvi Officer, Education Department. Singh, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition assails the orders dated 30.04.2014 and 14.05.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.3253/2012 and R.A WP(C) No.8119/2015 Page 1 of 18 No.33/2014, whereby the... Petitioners O.A and R.A have been dismissed. The... Petitioner had preferred the Original Application seeking a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to re-fix his pay with respect to the upgraded pre-revised scale of ...
Dd Global Capital pvt.ltd. & Ors. Vs.m/s s.e Investments Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~OS-52 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 20, 2017 O.M.P. (COMM) 450/2016 and IA No.13090/2016 (stay) DD GLOBAL CAPITAL PVT.LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Diggaj Pathak, Ms. Shweta Sharma and Mr. Shaurya Vardhan, Advocates. versus M/S S.E INVESTMENTS LTD. Through Mr.P.Nagesh, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking to challenge the Award dated 22.06.2016 passed by the learned Arbitrator.2. The respondent is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and registered to carry on the business of non-banking financial institution. The case of the respondent as comes out from the pleadings, namely, the statement of claim/replication filed before the learned Arbitrator is that in 2008, petitioner No.1 approached the respondent for...
Ultratech Cement Ltd. Vs.brys International Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~C-63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Delivered on:20. h September, 2017 CO.PET. 359/2016 ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. Through : Ms.Deepa Sharma, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus BRYS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD ..... Respondent Through : None % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. On 07.10.2016 none appeared on behalf of the respondent despite service of notice and even no affidavit of the Managing Director in terms of order dated 02.05.2016 was filed. In the interest of justice, adverse orders were deferred and status quo qua the disposal of companys property was given. On 11.04.2017 the counsel for the respondent appeared and prayed for some time to file Vakalatnama, the reply to petition and the affidavit of Managing Director, as directed. Today no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent. Neither vakalatnama/reply is filed nor the Managing Director of respondent is present. Hence I proceed to hear the petition. Co. Petition No.359/2016 Page 1 of 6 2. It ...
Santosh Singh vs.ramesh Kumar & Anr. (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.760/2015 SANTOSH SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate versus RAMESH KUMAR & ANR. (THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shuchi Singh, Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant, then 64 years old, had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 05.11.2008 at about 7:45PM due to negligent driving of motorcycle bearing registration No.DL- 8SNA-4345, admittedly insured against third party risk with the second respondent (insurer) for the period in question. On his claim petition (MACT No.333/09/13) instituted on 17.03.2008, the tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 22.07.2013, held the first respondent, the driver of the motorcycle to be responsible for the accident. The said finding has attained finality as it was not challenged by an...
Dimple Kapoor vs.icici Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8402/2017 and CM APPL. 34579/2017 and CM APPL.34580/2017 DIMPLE KAPOOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Anand Aggarwal and Ms Reena Jain Malhotra, Advs. versus Through: Mr Kashish Narang, Adv. ..... Respondent ICICI BANK CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER2009.2017 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 30.08.2017, passed by the learned DRAT in Misc. Appeal No.365/2017 filed by the respondent/Bank against the order dated 23.08.2017, passed by the DRT-II, Delhi whereunder her application for seeking release of the vehicle on superdari was allowed on a conditional basis.2. We have enquired from learned counsel for the parties to inform us about the status of the impleadment application filed by the petitioner before the DRT-II. They state that the said application is still pending and is listed on 09.10.2017, for appropriate orders. In view of the pendency of the said application...
Nawal Kishore Yadav vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 20, 2017 + LPA6272017 & CMs 34616-NAWAL KISHORE YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nikhil Jain and Mr. Satya Prakash, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. S.S. Rai, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, CGSC accepts notice.2. With consent of counsel, the matter was heard finally.3. The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by the learned Single Judges order. He had questioned the letter issued by the respondents requiring him to vacate the official quarter that he was permitted to retain soon after his repatriation and subsequent posting in the North East Region.4. The appellant/petitioner is an employee of the Border Security Force (BSF) who while serving in West Bengal, was deputed to the National Security Guard (NSG) for five years; his tenure en...
Ct Mukesh Kumar Yadav vs.gnct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
$~3. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 09.2017 % W.P.(C) 6005/2017 and C.M. No.24898/2017 CT MUKESH KUMAR YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sourabh Ahuja & Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocates. versus GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC along with ASI Tarun & ASI Balwinder Singh, Crime Branch, for the respondent/ GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 31.05.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.3548/2015. The Tribunal has dismissed the said OA preferred by the petitioner. The petitioner had assailed the order dated 05.09.2012 passed by the respondents dismissing him from service by resort to clause (b) of the 2nd proviso to Article 311 (2) of the Constitution of India, as well as the appellate order da...
National Insurance Company Ltd vs.canara Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.796/2017 + % NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S. Venkatesh, Advocate Singh, 20th September, 2017 with Mr. Varun Advocate. CANARA BANK AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Seema Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Manoj Kumar Arora, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.34152/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.34153/2017 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 82 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.796/2017 Page 1 of 10 C.M. No.34151/2017 (for condonation of delay of 416 days in filing the appeal) 3. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 does not oppose the application only as a technicality inasmuch as the arguments have otherwise been heard on merits. Withou...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »