Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Mohinder Kaur & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct, Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d September, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 1900/2015 and CRL.M.A.No.6829/2015 1. SMT. MOHINDER KAUR2 SMT. INDER JEET KAUR3 SHRI INDERPAL SINGH SAHNI ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Subhash Jha, with Mr.Idrish Javed, Advocates. versus 1. GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI2 SMT. TEJINDER KAUR SAHNI ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for State with S.I. Laxman Choudhary, P.S. Greater Kailash-1. Mr.K.K. Manan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ankush Narang and Ms. Shweta Sain, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I.S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. whereby the petitioners, i.e. (1) Mohinder Kaur, (2) Inder Jeet Kaur and (3) Inderpal Singh Sahni, are seeking quashing of the impugned summoning order dated 26.03.2012 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrat-08 (SE) in CC No.173/1. CRL.M.C. 1900/2015 Page 1 of 25 2. The brief facts stated are that the respondent No.2, i.e. Tejinder Kaur Sahni, ...
Madhu Khandelwal vs.m/s Bishamber Dayal Badri Prasad & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~42 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. 09.2017 CS(OS) 476/2011 MADHU KHANDELWAL ..... Plaintiff versus M/S BISHAMBER DAYAL BADRI PRASAD & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Defendants For the Plaintiff : For the Defendants : Plaintiff in person. Mr. Tanmay Nagar, Adv. for D-1,2, 3 & 4 Mr. Ashish Aggarwal and Mr. G. Hora, Advs. for D-8 to 11 with defendant No.8 to 11 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2209.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) I.A. 11118/2017 (Order XIII, Rule 3 CPC and CS(OS) 476/2011) 1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for declaration, permanent injunction and cancellation of Sale Deed executed by Smt. Nisha ========================================================== Page 1 of 4 I.A. 11118/2017 in CS(OS) 476/2011 Khandelwal, Sh. Narender Khandelwal and Sh. Ayush Khandelwal as partner of Bishamber Dayal Badri Prasad in favour of defendant No.8 to 11 with respect to property bearing No.1/2, Ram Kis...
Param Mitra Manav Nirman Sansthan vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 22, 2017 + W.P.(C) 6108/2015 & C.M. 11110/2015 PARAM MITRA MANAV NIRMAN SANSTHAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal & Mr. Prateek Kohli, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondent-UOI Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak & Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocates for respondent-L&B/LAC Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for respondent-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The claim in this petition is for a direction that petitioners land bearing Khasra No.86(admeasuring 2000 sq. yards), situated in the revenue estate of village Mahipalpur, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit land) be declared free from acquisition in terms of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereafter referred to as the Act of...
Kiran Vati & Ors. Vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
+ % KIRAN VATI & ORS. 22nd September, 2017 Mr. Puneet Goel, Adv. ..... Appellants Through: versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO No.378/2017 & CM No.34839/2017 (exemption) UNION OF INDIA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 impugning the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal dated 23.5.2017 by which the Railway Claims Tribunal has dismissed the claim petition filed by the appellants/applicants.2. The facts of the case are that the father and husband of the appellants/applicants namely Sh. Bhopal Singh is said to have died in a train accident on 1.10.2015 when he was travelling back from Shahdara Delhi to Behta. Appellants/applicants pleaded that the FAO No.378/2017 Page 1 of 8 deceased had come to Delhi to attend a retirement party of one of his friends but he did not return back to his home....
Devashish Garg vs.directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~32 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA6282017, CM APPL.34731-34733/2017 DECIDED ON:22. 09.2017 DEVASHISH GARG ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Prateek Chaturvedi and Mr. Anubhav Mehrotra, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.C. Aggarwal, Adv. for R-1&2. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for CBEC with Mr. Abhishek Ghei, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Mr. P.C. Aggarwal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the first and second respondents who are in effect the contesting parties. With consent of counsel, the appeal was heard finally.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge who had accepted his contentions in the writ petition, holding that the impounding before seizure without initiation of appropriate proceedings under the Passports Act, 1967 by th...
Surbhi Puranik @ Surabhi Puranik vs.mash Audio Visuals Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d September , 2017 CS(COMM) 205/2017 SURBHI PURANIK @ SURABHI PURANIK Represented by: Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Mansi versus Kukreja, Advs. ..... Plaintiff MASH AUDIO VISUALS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Adv. for D-1. Mr. Manish Singhal, Adv. for D-2. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. for D-3. Ms. Mary Mitzy, Mr. Gopal, Advs. for D-6. Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, Mr. Sumit, Advs. for D-7. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Ms. Shikha Bhoria, Advs. for D-8. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) IA70622017 1. By this application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC plaintiff seeks amendment of the plaint. In the plaint the plaintiff has sought a decree of permanent injunction restraining infringement and passing off the trade mark and restraining the defendants No.2 to 10 from using or publicizing or projecting the profile of the photographs of the CS(COMM) 205/2017 Page 1 of 5 plaintiff taken ...
Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd. (Iffco) vs.anand Commercial ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. 09.2017 ARB.P. 512/2017 INDIAN FARMERS FERTILISER COOPERATIVE LTD. (IFFCO) ........ Petitioner versus ANAND COMMERCIAL COMPANY & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Arpita, Ms. Vasudha Trivedi and Ms. Kanika Singhal, Advocates : Mr. Rohit Singh, Advocate CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner by this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. It is contended that by order dated 07.11.2014 Justice S.K. Mahajan, former Judge, Delhi High Court was appointed as the Sole ARB.P. 466/2017 Page 1 of 2 Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. It is further contended that Justice S.K. Mahaj...
Ajay Kumar vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1930/2017 AJAY KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.J.P. Singh, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State with SI Pramod Kumar, PS Sultan Puri, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER2209.2017 Crl.M.A. 15971/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 1930/2017 1.2. Notice. Learned APP for the State, who appears on an advance copy having been served, accepts notice. Apprehending his arrest in a case registered against him vide FIR No.923/2014 on 26.08.2014 under Section 3of IPC with Police Station Sultan Puri, Outer District Delhi on the Bail Appln. 1930/2017 Page 1 of 3 complaint of one Praveen Kumar, the petitioner invokes the jurisdiction of this court under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has bee...
Sh. Raj Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.8494/2017 Date of decision:22. d September, 2017 SH. RAJ KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal & Mr. Tenzing Thinlay Lepcha, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate for UOI alongwith Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, DC, Law, CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner, Raj Kumar was appointed as a Cook in the Central Reserve Police Force on 22nd May, 1989.2. 3. The petitioner tendered his resignation on 28th February, 2000. The resignation was accepted and the petitioner was discharged from service on 31st March, 2000.4. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging vires of Rule 26 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, W.P. (C) No.8494/2017 Page 1 of 11 (Pension Rules, for short) to the extent it states that resignation from service or post entai...
Supertrack Hotels Pvt Ltd vs.friends Motels Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 307/2016 & CM392102016 FAO(OS) 40/2017 & CMs 5569/2017, 5571/2017 Date of decision : September 22, 2017 Reserved on:22. d August, 2017 1. SUPERTRACK HOTELS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K.Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Shiv Chopra, Mr.A.Khanna, Mr.Mayank Mishra, Advs. versus FRIENDS MOTELS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manu Monga, Mr.S.K.Jha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.The appellant has filed the above appeals, challenging the judgment and order dated 29.04.2016 passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court in OMP(I) No.643/2015 and the order dated 14.09.2016 passed by the Learned Single Judge in FAO (OS) 307/2016 &40/2017 Page 1 I.A. No.5844/2016 in OMP (I) 643/2015 modifying the order dated 29.04.2016 with respect to the amount payable to the respondent as an interim measure. We reproduce herein the final direction of L...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »