Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopal Kishan vs.ram Saroop
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~34. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV. No.443/2017 and CM No.34870/2017 (for stay). GOPAL KISHAN Through: Ms. Deepika, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent Through: None. RAM SAROOP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2209.2017 CM No.34871/2017 (for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RC.REV. No.443/2017 and CM No.34870/2017 (for stay).3. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order (dated 17th May, 2017 in E.No.55(Old E.No.41/15) of the Court of Rent Controller (North-West), District, Rohini Courts, Delhi) of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner from property no.A-19, Harijan Colony, Sawan Park, Ashok Vihar- III, Delhi 110 052.4. The manner in whi...
Court on Its Own Motion (Air Pollution in Delhi) vs.union of India & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1346/2015 & CM Nos.35024/2016, 640/2017, 4383- 4384/2017, 8565/2017, 18856/2017 & 26231-26233/2017 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION (AIR POLLUTION IN DELHI) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. (Amicus Curiae) with Mr. Sumer Singh Sandhu, Mr. Umrao Singh Rawat & Ms. Rajkhowa Divija, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajay Arora and Mr. Govind Kumar, Advs. for SDMC. Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mrs. Biji Rajesh for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for EDMC. Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. for DTC. Mr. Om Prakash, Adv. for Northern Railway. Mr. Anchit Sharma with Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Ms. Diksha Lal and Mr. Rahul Singhal, Advs. for DCB. Mr. Anil Grover, AAG Haryana along with Mr. Mishal Vij, Advs. for State of Haryana. Mr. Sakya Singha Chaudhuri, AAG with Ms. Shreya Mukerjee, Adv. for State of Punjab. Mr. Anil Mittal with Ms. Komal Ag...
Hansraj vs.jagminder Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % HANSRAJ RFA No.809/2017 22nd September, 2017 Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. H.S.Kohli, Advocate. JAGMINDER SINGH & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.34804/2017(Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM Nos. 34802/2017(delay in filing) and 34803/2017 (delay in re- filing) For the reasons stated in the applications, delay in filing and re- filing is condoned. CMs stand disposed of. RFA No.809/2017 & CM Nos.34799/2017 (U/s 144 r/w 151 CPC) and 34800/2017 (U/o XLI Rule 27 CPC).1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit RFA No.809/2017 Page 1 of 19 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 22.2.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for possession and injunction filed by the respondents/plaintiff...
Jagmohan Behl vs.state Bank of Indore
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (OS) No.166/2016 % Reserved on:27. hApril, 2017 Date of Decision:22. d September, 2017 JAGMOHAN BEHL ....Appellant Through Mr. D.K. Rustagi, Ms. Apoorv Rustagi and Ms. Medha Arya, Advocates. Versus STATE BANK OF INDORE Respondents Through Mr. S.N. Relan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.This intra-Court appeal raises an interesting issue on interpretation of Section 2 (1) (c) (vii) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (Act, for short).2. Facts in brief relevant for the present controversy may be noted. The appellant, Jagmohan Behl, has instituted CS (OS) No.2008/2010 against the tenant, State Bank of Indore, who is respondent before us.For the sake of convenience, the appellant has been described as the plaintiff and the respondent has been described as the defendant in the present order and judgment. FAO (...
Arvind Kumar vs.naresh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~R-256 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.APP. 732/2010 Decided on:22. d September, 2017 ARVIND KUMAR Through: Nemo. ..... Appellant versus NARESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the tribunal in MACT Claim Petition No.690/2009, which was decided by judgment dated 03.06.2010 returning finding that he had suffered injuries and became permanently handicapped on account of motor vehicular accident that had occurred on the night of 26th and 27th August, 2004 involving negligent driving of a goods carrier (TSR) bearing registration No.HR- 55A-3879, admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question. The driver of the said vehicle (first respondent) having been found to be guilty of negligence, the vicarious liability consequently placed on the door of the registered owner of the vehicl...
Narinder Kumar vs.radha Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.629/2015 NARINDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Versus RADHA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R- + MAC APPEAL No.641/2015 1 to 3. NARINDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. versus SUBHASH SHARMA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 27.01.2014 a motor vehicular accident is stated to have occurred at about 10.00 a.m. in the area of Nagar Van Park within the jurisdiction of police station Sagarpur, Delhi, wherein two pedestrians MAC Appeal No.629 & 641 of 2015 Page 1 of 6 while crossing the road were statedly hit by Maruti van bearing registration No.DL2AF2736(the van), it being driven in a rash or negligent manner by one Sudhir Kumar (a respondent in these appeals). Both the said pedestrians including Subhash Sharma and Prith...
Rajeev Chabra & Ors vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~33 * + 1.2. 3.4. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1605/2017 RAJEEV CHABRA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. petitioner no.1 in person. J.P. Malviya, Advocate with versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Mr.Sachin Gupta, Advocate with ASI Lakhan, PS Roop Nagar, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER2209.2017 % Status report has been filed. Respondent No.2 appears in person. She is duly identified by IO ASI Lakhan. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.45/2007, registered on 30.01.2007 against them with Police Station Roop Nagar, North District, Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. The marriage of the petitioner no.1 with the respondent No.2 was solemnized on 26.01.2...
Naeem @ Naimuddin vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 47/2017 & Crl.M(B) 1328/2017 (for regular bail) Date of Judgment:22. d September, 2017 NAEEM @ NAIMUDDIN Through: Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellant $~15 * + % versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) challenging the judgment dated 16.02.2013 passed by the learned Trial Court whereby the appellant Naeem alongwith other four co-accused have been convicted under Section 395 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC). Challenge is also laid to the order on sentence dated 28.02.2013 whereby the appellant Naeem was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 395 read with Section 397 of IPC.2...
Ramesh Chander vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9350/2014 % 1. RAMESH CHANDER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal with Ms. Mansi Agarwal, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through:Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advocate for R-1/UOI. Mr. Deeptakirti Verma, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG On 12.04.2017, this Court had required respondents 2-4 to file ORDER2209.2017 detailed affidavit indicating the following: (i) The number of vacancies and the reasons thereof and the historical nature of vacancies i.e. the time period for which vacancies have existed; (ii) The steps taken by the Delhi Government to invite the sanctioned specialised posts for the last three years and the timeline within which it is proposed to be done shall also be disclosed; (iii) Additionally the Government of NCT of Delhi shall outline the specialised equipment procured by these institutions and the reaso...
Prize Petroleum Company Ltd. Vs.abg Energy Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ARB.P. 296/2017 Judgment delivered on:22. 09.2017 PRIZE PETROLEUM COMPANY LTD ABG ENERGY LIMITED & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Ashish Rana with Mr. Surekh Baxy, Adv. : Mr. Rajiv Tyagi with Mr. Varun Singh, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeks appointment of Arbitrators in terms of Clause 16(b) of the Agreement dated 03.03.2011 between the parties.2. As per the petitioner, around October 2010, the Government of India invited bids under NELP IX round for exploration of oil and natural gas. ARB. PET. 296/2017 Page 1 of 17 3. The petitioner as well as respondent No.1, being desirous of exploring the possibility of bidding jointly or in association with other companies, had entered ...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »