Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Sunil Gupta vs.canara Bank and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8576/2017 and CM No.35275/2017 and CM No.35276/2017 SHRI SUNIL GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Jaya Tomar, Adv. versus CANARA BANK AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr J.P. Gupta, Adv. alongwith Mr Ranjit Kumar, Chif Manager of the Bank CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % 1. ORDER2509.2017 The petitioner-auction purchaser is aggrieved by the order dated 13.09.2017, passed by the learned DRAT, dismissing his appeal against the order dated 13.06.2017, passed by the learned DRT-III, Delhi, upholding an order dated 22.02.2017, passed by the Recovery Officer in RC No.312/2015 entitled Canara Bank vs. Pawan Mittal.2. Briefly stated, the relevant facts of the case are that the respondent/Bank decided to conduct an e-auction in respect of premises No.313/33-B, measuring 90 square yards, on a portion of old plot No.7, P.S. Sarai Rohilla, abadi known as Shoes Market, Main Road, Inder Lok, Delhi-35...
Resident Welfare Association & Anr vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~ * + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 09.2017 REVIEW PET. 367/2017, CM APPL.32637-32639/2017 IN W.P. (C) 4841/2016 RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR ........ Petitioners versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS REVIEW PET.382/2017, CM APPL.33818-33821/2017 IN W.P. (C) 4842/2016 RANDHIR SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners versus LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS REVIEW PET.383/2017, CM APPL.33825-33828/2017 IN W.P. (C) 6134/2016 ARUN KAPOOR ........ Petitioner versus LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS REVIEW PET.385/2017, CM APPL.33870-33873/2017 IN W.P. (C) 6150/2016 NETRA AGENCY PVT LTD ........ Petitioner versus LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Appearance: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Advocates for petitioners in all matters. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Rev. Pet. No.367/2017 in W.P.(C) No.4841/2016 & conn....
M/S Autocomps India Ltd. Vs.appellate Authority for Industrial & Finan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9722/2015 M/S AUTOCOMPS INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashsish Dasgupta, Managing Director of petitioner. versus APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL & FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION, NEW DELHI & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay K. Jain, Advocate along with Mr. Yash Karan Jain, Advocate for respondent No.1/Canara Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER2209.2017 1. Mr. Ashish Das Gupta, Managing Director of the petitioner/Company is present. He states that pursuant to the order dated 21.09.2017, he has interacted with his strategic investors and is confident that the petitioners shall be able to deposit a sum of Rs. 75 lakhs with the respondent/Bank i.e. the OTS offer, if given a period of 60 days, reckoned from 31.10.2017.2. He further states that to show its bona fides, the petitioner/Company had deposited a sum of Rs. 6 lakhs with the respondent No.3/Bank, which fact is co...
Hira Nand vs.union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.7162/2016 Reserved on:19. h April, 2017 % HIRA NAND Date of Decision:22. d September, 2017 ....Petitioners Through Mr. Shakil Akhtar with Ms. Kusum Sanahi, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Respondents Through Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Central Government Standing Counsel with Mr. S.S. Rai, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.This is a second round of litigation by Hira Nand, the writ petitioner, who has prayed for quashing of Memorandum dated 5th March, 2004 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Memorandum dated 10th June, 1999 issued by the Directorate General of Security, Addendum dated 1st September, 1987 issued by the Cabinet Secretariat, Government of India, and order dated 8th February, 1999, passed by the Cabinet Secretariat being arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.2. In nutshell, the prayer of th...
M/S Chelmsford Club Limited vs.ravindra Nath Sahni & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~4. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) No.371/2016 Date of decision:22. d September, 2017 M/S CHELMSFORD CLUB LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sankalp Goswami & Mr. Azhar Alam, Advocates. versus RAVINDRA NATH SAHNI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. A. Banerji, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, we are disposing of this intra Court appeal under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 allowing IA No.13323/2016 filed by the respondent No.1-plaintiff.2. The respondent No.1, namely, Ravindra Nath Sahni, has filed a suit for injunction against the appellant, which is a club in Delhi. FAO(OS) No.371/2016 Page 1 of 7 3. IA No.13323/2016 filed by the respondent No.1-plaintiff under Order I Rule 8 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Code, for short), is rather short and reads as under:-"The Plaintiff has filed t...
Narinder Kumar vs.subhash Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~11 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. d September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.629/2015 NARINDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Versus RADHA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R- + MAC APPEAL No.641/2015 1 to 3. NARINDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. versus SUBHASH SHARMA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 27.01.2014 a motor vehicular accident is stated to have occurred at about 10.00 a.m. in the area of Nagar Van Park within the jurisdiction of police station Sagarpur, Delhi, wherein two pedestrians MAC Appeal No.629 & 641 of 2015 Page 1 of 6 while crossing the road were statedly hit by Maruti van bearing registration No.DL2AF2736(the van), it being driven in a rash or negligent manner by one Sudhir Kumar (a respondent in these appeals). Both the said pedestrians including Subhash Sharma and Prith...
Rajesh Kumar vs.harish Kumar & Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h September, 2017 Decided on:22. d September, 2017 CS(OS) 1786/2009 RAJESH KUMAR ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Rajender Agarwal, Advocate. versus HARISH KUMAR & ANOTHER ..... Defendants Represented by: Mr.Fanish K. Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA I.A. No.9673/2017 (under Order XVI Rule 1A read with Section 151 CPC-by defendants) 1. By this application defendants pray that a handwriting expert be permitted to take photographs of the signature of the plaintiff on the documents exhibited as Ex. DW-1/1, DW-and DW-from the Court record and compare the same with the admitted signatures of the plaintiff from the court record in the presence of the parties before the Deputy Registrar/Joint Registrar and also for directions to the plaintiff to give his specimen signature/handwriting for comparison, directions to DW-3 Shri Satish Malik, Clerk, Office of District Town Planner, Sonepat, Haryana to produce th...
Ashok Kumar vs.rakesh Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : September 22nd, 2017 RFA4532009 ASHOK KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravi Chawla, Mr. Vivek Luthra and Ms. Mehak, Advs. versus RAKESH KUMAR & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS + RFA4542009 ASHOK KUMAR Through: Mr. Ajay Kohli and Ms. Bhumika Kapoor, Advs. for R-1 Ms. Ashima Puri, Adv. for R-5 AND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravi Chawla, Mr. Vivek Luthra and Ms. Mehak Tanwar, Advs. versus RAKESH KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Kohli and Ms. Bhumika Kapoor, Advs. for R-1 Ms. Ashima Puri, Adv. for R-5 CORAM: RFA453/2009&RFA454/2009 Page 1of 13 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.JUDGMENT1 The appellant has filed two appeals being aggrieved by the common judgment and decree dated 26.08.2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi whereby the Suit no.60 of 2004 filed by the respondent no.1-herein has been decreed in his...
Uttrakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board & Ors vs.competition C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10411/2016 and CM Nos. 40871/2016, 17613/2017 & 32079/2017 UTTRAKHAND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING BOARD & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Virendra Rawat, Advocate. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR Through: Mr Zoheb Hossain, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS CCI/R-1. Mr V.P. Singh and Mr Raghav Seth, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2209.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner no.1 is a body corporate which is entrusted with the functioning of developing and regulating 'Mandies' in the State of Uttrakhand.... Petitioner nos. 2 & 3 are companies wholly owned by the Government of Uttrakhand and are, inter alia, charged with the function of developing tourism in the region of Garhwal and Kumaon respectively.2. The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 19.07.2016 (hereafter 'the impugned order') passed by the Competition Commission of India (h...
Randhir Singh & Ors vs.lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-22-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 09.2017 REVIEW PET. 367/2017, CM APPL.32637-32639/2017 IN W.P. (C) 4841/2016 RESIDENT WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR ........ Petitioners LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS versus And connected matters: + + + REVIEW PET.382/2017, CM APPL.33818-33821/2017 IN W.P. (C) 4842/2016 REVIEW PET.383/2017, CM APPL.33825-33828/2017 IN W.P. (C) 6134/2016 REVIEW PET.385/2017, CM APPL.33870-33873/2017 IN W.P. (C) 6150/2016 Appearance: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Advocates for petitioners in all matters. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for L&B/GNCTD with Mrs. K. Kaumudi Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj Tater, Advocate. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate for DDA in all matters. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Page 1 of 2 The review petitions ar...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »