Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 27 2017

S P Saxena vs.cbi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:01. 09.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:27. 09.2017 W.P.(CRL) 1490/2011 S P SAXENA Through: Mr.S.P. Mehta, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP for CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Articleof the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) seeking quashment of the order dated 06.08.2010 passed by learned Special Judge, CBI in CC No.10/2008 vide RC No.the inter-alia, application dated 27.11.2009 of praying that the proceedings in the case are not sustainable. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a Division Bench of this court in W.P. No.10066/2004 in the 6(S)/2006/CBI/SCR-III while dismissing the petitioner, 2. W.P. (Crl.) 1490/2011 Page 1 of 5 3. order dated 21.03.2006 granted six weeks time t...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Krishan Chand vs.gnctd and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 09.2017/11.09.2017 & 12.09.2017 Pronounced on:27. 09.2017 LPA1732017, C.M. APPL.10119/2017, 10120/2017, 10121/2017 & 10122/2017 RANJEET SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant versus And connected matters: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + LPA3752017 LPA7902013, C.M. APPL.16742/2013 LPA6502016 LPA8962013, C.M. APPL.18674/2013 LPA732014, C.M. APPL.1542/2014 & 1543/2014 LPA742014, C.M. APPL.1544/2014 LPA5002016, C.M. APPL.33048/2016 & 19265/2017 LPA5012016 LPA5042016 LPA5052016 LPA5562016 LPA5582016 LPA5622016 LPA5752016 LPA5762016 LPA5782016 LPA5792016 LPA5802016, C.M. APPL.32818/2017 & 32819/2017 LPA5812016 LPA5822016 LPA5832016 LPA5842016 LPA5902016 LPA5912016 LPA6092016 LPA6102016 LPA6112016 LPA6122016 LPA6132016 LPA6142016 LPA6152016 LPA6172016 LPA1732017 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + LPA6192016 LPA6292016 LPA6312016 LPA6372016 LPA64...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Jai Prakash Chauhan vs.gnctd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited vs.suraj Pal & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~R-282 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL NO.876/2010 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus SURAJ PAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent, then aged 35 years, earning his livelihood as a hawker of bangles, while moving on his bicycle on 13.04.2006, suffered injuries on being hit by a motorcycle bearing registration No.HR-13B-7593 driven in a negligent manner by the third respondent, the said vehicle being registered in the name of the second respondent and insured against third party risk for the period in question with the appellant insurance company.2. The victim/injured (the first respondent) instituted accident claim case (Petition No.882/2008) on 19.05.2006 seeking compensation, pleading that he had been rendered permanently disabled. The tribunal held inq...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Rakhee Gupta vs.pramod Bajaj & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27thSeptember, 2017 + 1. CRL.M.C. 2297/2017 PRAMOD KUMAR BAJAJ Through: versus... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State THE STATE & ANR + 2. CRL.M.C. 2298/2017 & CRL.M.A.15628-15629/2017 PRAMOD KUMAR BAJAJ & ORS. Through:... Petitioner No.1 in person. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State Inspector Seema Yadav, PS-Prashant Vihar... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS + 3. CRL.M.C. 5371/2014 RAKHEE GUPTA Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR + 4. CRL.M.C. 5372/2014 RAKHEE GUPTA Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.M.C. Nos.2297/2017, 2298/2017, 5371/2014, 5372/2014, 137/2013, 2948/2013, 1298/2013 2013, 3577/2013, ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Jaggi and Anr. Vs.uoi and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Jasmer Kaur vs.jai Singh & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~R-278 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h September, 2017 JASMER KAUR + MAC.APP.851/2010 JAI SINGH & ORS. versus Through ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was the claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) in accident claim case (suit no.55A/09) instituted on 18.04.2009 on the averments that she had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 03.01.2009 due to the negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.HP-12A- 8635 by the first respondent, the said vehicle being registered in the name of the second respondent and insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer).2. The Tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 12.08.2010, accepted the case for compensation holding the second respondent negligent. The Tribunal awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.68,110/- in favour o...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Satyavati and Ors. Vs.l&b Deptt and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

Gurdip Singh Anand vs.joseph Daniel

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:24. 08.2017 Judgment Pronounced on:27. 09.2017 CRL.A. 371/2017 GURDIP SINGH ANAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sagar Saxena, Advocate. versus JOSEPH DANIEL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. passed by the 10.08.2015 Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to impugned judgment dated learned Metropolitan Magistrate, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Complaint Case No.545/2013 whereby the respondent was acquitted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short NI Act) The appellant and the respondent entered into a loan agreement dated 01.04.2011 whereby a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-was granted as loan to the respondent who assured the appellant that the loan amount would be repaid till December, 2011.2. Crl.A. 371/2017 Page 1 of 11 3.4. 5. In December, 2011 the appellant demanded the loan amount from the resp...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2017

M/S Devyani International Ltd. Vs.siddhivinayak Builders and Developer ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. 09.2017 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 373/2017 $~OS-37 * % + M/s DEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Rishi Kapoor and Mr.Raunak Satpathy, Advs. versus SIDDHIVINAYAK BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS Through Mr.Rajender Singhvi, Mr.Ashish ........ RESPONDENTS Verma and Mr.Farman Ali, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.10836/2017 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 373/2017 1. The present petition is filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an interim order restraining the respondents from obstructing the petitioner in recovering its assets as per Annexure C of the Leave and License Agreement dated 20.10.2014 from the demised premises.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner entered into a Leave and License Agreement with the respondent on 20.10.2014 for opening its stores under the name and banner of Pizza Hut...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.