Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India & Ors. Vs.shyam Sunder Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(C) 2482/2016 and C.M. No.10670/2016 Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:12. 09.2017 25.09.2017 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj & Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocates along with Mr.Neeraj Gautam, ACIO-1/G, in person. versus SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Madhumita Kothari, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner-Union of India assails the order dated 27.11.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.860/2014. The Tribunal has allowed the said Original Application and directed the petitioner to consider promoting the respondent/applicants serving as Deputy Central Intelligence Officers (DCIO/Tech-WT) (hereinafter referred to as DCIO) since 01.11.2011, to the post of AD/Tech. for the vacancy year 2014-15, and later years, after taking into account the W....
b.p.singh & Ors. Vs.mcd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h September, 2017 Date of Decision:25. hSeptember, 2017 + W.P.(C) No.1608/2015 B.P. SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Raman Duggal, Adv. with Mr.Akshay Choudhary, Adv., Ms.Aayushi Gupta, Adv. & Mr.I. Duggal, Adv. versus MCD & ORS. Delhi ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Adv. for Municipal North Corporation with Mr.Vasundhara Nayyar, Adv. & Ms.Anushruti, Adv. Mr.Balendu Shekhar, Adv. with Mr.Sriansh, & Mr.Rajkumar Maurya, Adv. for R-3 & 4. Mr.Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv. for R- 5 & 6. Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J The present writ petition assails the order dated 09.09.2014 1. passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New WP (C) No.1608/2015 Page 1 of 24 Delhi in TA No.599/2009 whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the... Petitioners Transfer Application. The... Petitioners had filed a writ petition before this Court se...
Manglam Express Cargo Pvt. Ltd. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:25. 09.2017 ARB.P. 552/2017 MANGLAM EXPRESS CARGO PVT. LTD......... Petitioner Through versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner... RESPONDENTS : : Mr. Chetan Wahi, Advocate. Mr. Hashmat Nabi with Mr. Abhinav Thareja, Advocates with Mr. Digvijay Malik, OS, Legal, Railways. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2509.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.2. The petitioner entered into a parcel leasing agreement with the respondents for a period of three years on 25.03.2010.3. Disputes arose between the parties during the execution of the said contract leading to the respondents issuing a show cause notice to ARB. PET.552 /2017 Page 1 of 4 the petitioner for ca...
Sabh Infrastructure Ltd vs.asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1357/2016 SABH INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr.Sanat Kapoor, Advocates. versus ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Senior Standing Counel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Junior Standing Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % ORDER2509.2017 1. The... Petitioner seeks the quashing of a notice dated 20th March, 2015 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act (Act) by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (hereinafter Assessing Officer AO) and the order dated 1st February, 2016 passed by the AO disposing of the objections filed by the... Petitioner to the said notice.2. The... Petitioner is a company engaged in the business of real estate and property development. It filed its return of income for the Assessment Year (AY) 2008-09 on 30th September, 2008 declaring a total income of W.P...
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs.m/s Teknow Consultants & Engineers ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
$~76 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO(OS) 261/2017 Date of decision :25. h September, 2017 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Mr Divya Nishant and Mr. Pallav Kumar, Advs. versus M/S TEKNOW CONSULTANTS & ENGINEERS PVT LTD Through : Mr. Karan Luthra, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.35246/2017 (exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM No.35248/2017 (condonation of delay in refilling) 3. Notice.4. Mr.Karan Luthra, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. FAO(OS)No.261/2017 Page 1 of 11 5. Having regard to the nature of the application, counsel are orally heard.6. This application seeks condonation of 103 days delay in refiling the present appeal after its original filing on 11th May, 2017. It appears that, despite being apprised of the objections b...
Harbans Lal Kumar & Ors vs.oriental Insurance Company Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
$~R-265 & R-266 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:25. h September, 2017 + MAC.APP. 792/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate versus HARBANS LAL KUMAR & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 HARBANS LAL KUMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate .... Appellants + MAC.APP. 824/2010 versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Amit Gaur, Advocate for R-1. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Navneet Kumar, 27 years old, having obtained the degrees of Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical) and Master of Business Administration (MBA) was working for gain and died as a result of the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 31.01.2002, due to negligent driving of tempo bearing MAC A7922010 & 824/2010 Page 1 of 5 registration no.DL-1LB-4296 (the tempo) and the truck bearing registration No.UP-21-83...
Vikas Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
$~22 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1753/2017 VIKAS KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: All petitioners in person. versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with SI Vikrant, PS Seema Puri, Delhi. Mr. RPS Bhatti, Advocate for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER2509.2017 Crl.M.A. 9651/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 1753/2017 1.2. Status report has been filed. Respondent No.2 appears in person. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO Vikrant. The petitioners submit that their counsel is not available today on account of being unwell. They submit that they have come all the way from District Sitamarhi, Bihar, hence their petition may be considered. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under 3.4. W.P. (Crl.) No.1753/2017 Page 1 of 4 Article...
Arun Ganguli vs.amaresh Ganguli (Deceased) Through His Legal Heirs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ARUN GANGULI RSA No.2/2017 Reserved on:18. h September, 2017 Pronounced on:25. h September, 2017 Through: Ms. Neela Gokhale and Mr. ..... Appellant Versus Ilam Pridi, Advs. AMARESH GANGULI (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS Through: Respondent no.2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit, impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 20.12.2012 and the first appellate court dated 22.9.2016; by which the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for mandatory injunction against the defendant/Sh. Amaresh Ganguli to vacate the first floor of the property being House No.A-16, Chitranjan RSA No.2/2017 Page 1 of 22 Park, Kalkaji, New Delhi admeasuring 320 sq. yds. and handover its possession to the a...
Abdul Nafis vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
$~R-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ABDUL NAFIS STATE Date of Decision : September 25,2017 CRL.A. 614/2017 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate with Sh.Iqbal Miyan brother of the appellant. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. Complainant/injured in person. PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant has filed the instant appeal impugning the judgment dated 9th May, 2017 and order on sentence dated 24th May, 2017 whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 3IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for ten years and to pay a fine of 50,000/-, which shall be paid to the injured/victim, and in case the fine amount is not deposited, to undergo SI for two years.2. Briefly stating, the case of the prosecution is that on 11th November, 2015 at 10.45 p.m. an information was received at PS Seelam Pur from B-51 Operator, Police Control Room to the effect that E-Block Seelam Pur Thane ke samne park ke kone par...
Rahul(minor) vs.state & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 75/2015 RAHUL(MINOR) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Rai, Advocate versus STATE & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None Date of Decision:25. h September, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner by his father and natural guardian, Sh. Surinder Pal under Sections 276 and 278 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of letters of administration in respect of Will dated 27th September, 2002 of the deceased Sh. Mam Chand.2. Since the petitioner-minor in the present case has sued through his father who has no interest adverse to that of the minor-petitioner, the petitioners father is appointed as the guardian for the minor-petitioner for the present petition.3. It has been averred in the petition that the petitioner is the grandson of the deceased Sh. Mam Chand, who expired on 01st February, 2009. The deceased is stated to hav...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »