Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anita Barreja vs.jagdish Lal Barreja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~1&23. * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI stay), CM CM(M) No.1043/2016, CM No.38198/2016 No.38199/2016, CM No.38200/2016, CM No.38201/2016 for exemption), CM No.38202/2016 (for direction), CM No.43386/2016, CM No.43387/2016 (both for exemption) and CM No.30271/2017 (of the respondent for vacation of stay) in CM(M) No.1043/2016. ANITA BARREJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Batra, Adv. along with (for (all JAGDISH LAL BARREJA ..... Respondent petitioner in person. versus Through: Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Sanam tripathi, Mr. Keshav Sehgal, Mr. Sunny Arora and Mr. S.K. Garg, Advs. AND CONT.CAS(C) No.589/2017 JAGDISH LAL BARREJA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Manmeet Arora, Ms. Sanam Tripathi, Mr. Keshav Sehgal, Mr. Sunny Arora and Mr. S.K. Garg, Advs. ANITA BARREJA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Batra, Adv. along with petitioner in person. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2609.2017 1. CM(M) No.1043/2016 was instituted impugning the orde...
United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.anita & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~148 * % + MAC.APP.704/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h September, 2017 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Appellant Through : Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus 1. ANITA & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.S.N. Parashar, Ms.Pankaj for Kumari, Advocates respondents no.1 and 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.34,65,689/- has been awarded to the respondents.2. The accident dated 16th June, 2009 resulted in death of Yash Sidana. The deceased was aged 21 years at the time of the accident and was in the 6th semester of B.Tech (Mechanical & Automation Engineering) at Al-Falah School of Engineering and Technology affiliated with M.D.University, Rohtak, Haryana. The deceased was survived by his parents who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal.3. The Claims Tribunal took income of the deceased as Rs.26,851/-, added 50% towards future pr...
Arshad vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:26. 09.2017 Crl. A. 36/2015 * % + ARSHAD STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI Versus Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State. ..... Respondent NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), the appellant has impugned the judgment dated 26/09/2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, convicting the appellant for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 30/09/2014 sentencing him with life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of which, he shall undergo one year RI.2. The prosecution's case is that, on 04.09.2011 the appellant had called his sister PW-1/complainant Ms. Nishat Parveen at about 2.45 a.m. informing her about the death of ...
Sap Se vs.newyorksys Info Solutions Private Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 447/2016 SAP SE ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ranjan Narula with Ms. Astha Joshi, Advocates versus ..... Defendants NEWYORKSYS INFO SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR Through: None % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Date of Decision:26. h September, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (ORAL): JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, trademark, passing off, rendition of accounts of profit, damages and delivery up etc. The prayer clause in the suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"injunction restraining (a) An order of Permanent the Defendant, its principal officers, directors, agents, franchisees, servants and all others acting for and on its behalf, from directly or indirectly reproducing / installing, providing training on software programmes of the Plaintiff, including but not limited to SAP ERP (functional and technical modules), SAP CRM, SAP SCM, SAP HANA SAP-ABAP and SAP FICO including the ...
Rashmi Jain & Ors. Vs.oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.& Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~R-269 & 270 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.806/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pavan Kumar for Mr. A.K. versus Soni, Adv. RASHMI JAIN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R- 1 to 4. + MAC APPEAL No.859/2010 RASHMI JAIN & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.& ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pavan Kumar for Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Rohit Jain, then 38 years old, met with an accident on 14.04.2003 involving negligent driving of car bearing registration No.DL1 0862, admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the appellant insurance company (insurer) and died as a result of injuries suffered. His wife and other members of the family MAC Appeal No.806/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 6 dependent on him, they being appellants in MAC A...
Jyoti Chadha vs.karan Chadha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 13/2014 JYOTI CHADHA ..... Appellant Through: Mrs Poonam Mendiratta and Ms Malvika Chaudhary, Adv. along with petitioner in person. versus KARAN CHADHA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Pradeep Narual and Ms Prerna Mehta, Advs. along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % CM No.35725/2017 (joint application by the parties in terms of the settlement arrived at dated 20.9.2017) 1. On 20.09.2017, the parties had agreed to settle their inter se ORDER2609.2017 disputes by arriving at a One-Time Settlement. The terms and conditions of the settlement arrived at between the parties were recorded in para 3-7 of the order dated 20.09.2017. In acknowledgement, both the parties had affixed their signatures on the ordersheet along with their respective counsels. One of the terms and conditions of the settlement was that the parties will file their respective affidavits accepting t...
Pradeep Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8005/2016 Date of decision:26. h September, 2017 PRADEEP KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Abhijat and Mr. Harshvardhan Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajan Sabharwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA J.(ORAL) The petitioner, Pradeep Kumar, was declared medically unfit on account of sub-standard vision and, therefore, denied selection and appointment as Constable in the Railway Protection Force.2. Pradeep Kumar pursuant to directions issued in W.P. (C) No.7469/2014 vide order dated 16th December, 2014 was examined by the Review Medical Board.3. The Review Medical Board, to ascertain whether the petitioner had undergone any refractive surgery had referred him to Guru Nanak Eye Centre, Delhi and All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. The petitioner was declared fit on the said account. W.P. (C) No.8005/...
Mohd. Imran vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:31. 08.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:26. 09.2017 CRL.A. 1315/2014 MOHD. IMRAN STATE CRL.A. 829/2012 MUKESH @ KARKA STATE CRL.A. 452/2013 AKRAM STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus versus versus ... Appellant No.1 ... Respondent ... Appellant No.2 ... Respondent ... Appellant No.3 ... Respondent Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate for Appellant No.1 Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate for Appellant No.2 Mr. Narsingh Narain Rai, Advocate for Appellant No.3 Mr. Ravi Naik, APP for the State with Inspector Bharat Meena, SHO, P.S. Swaroop Nagar and Inspector D.K. Tejwan, P.S. Pandav Nagar CRL.A.1315/2014, 829/2012 & 452/2013 Page 1 of 30 CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present batch of criminal appeals, being Criminal Appeal Nos. 1315/2014, 829/2012 and 452/2013 instituted under the provisions of section 374(2); sections 374(2), 383 read with section 482; and section 374 of th...
Honey Preet Insan vs.state and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~66 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1983/2017 HONEY PREET INSAN ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Mr.Bhaskar Bhardwaj, Mr. Raj Karan Sharma, Mr.Kapil Dhaka, Mr. Rana Kunal, Mr.Amresh Anand, Mr. Ashwyn Kalra, Mr. K. K. Chhabra, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State and Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Advocate. Mr. Anil Grover, AAG with Ms. Noopur Singhal, Advocate for respondent No.2/ State of Haryana. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER2609.2017 Crl. M.A.No.16329/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 1983/2017 1. An application under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.PC) has been filed for transit anticipatory bail for a period of three weeks on behalf of applicant on the grounds that the applicant is a peace loving...
Rajesh Kumar vs.manmohan Kumar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RAJESH KUMAR RFA No.829/2017 26th September, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Manoj Singh, Advocate. Through: versus MANMOHAN KUMAR & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.35533/2017 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.829/2017 and C.M. No.35532/2017 (stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant no.1 in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 30.5.2017 whereby trial court has decreed the suit of the respondent no.1/plaintiff for a sum of Rs.4.50 lacs along with interest at 9% per annum on account of the appellant/defendant no.1 having received an amount of Rs.4.50 RFA No.829/2017 Page 1 of 4 lacs under an agreement to sell dated 30.9.2011 with respect to property G-1/127 & G-1/128, 1st Floor, Sector-15,...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »