Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Nct of Delhi vs.radhey Shyam Etc.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2017 % + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI CRL.L.P. 315/2017 & Crl. M.A. No.8536/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with IO/Inspector Amita Sharma and ASI Baljeet Singh, P.S. Aman Vihar. Versus RADHEY SHYAM ETC. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. The present leave petition under Section 378(1) of Cr.P.C. impugns the judgment dated 17th May, 2016, rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, (North- West), Rohini Courts, New Delhi, thereby acquitting the respondent in case titled State vs. Radhey Shyam; arising out of FIR No.260/2011 under Sections 363/376/392/506/3IPC and Section 12 of POCSO Act.2. The case is that the prosecutrix Ms. S., a minor had been misled as well as confined in the second floor of the tenanted house of the respondents for about 8 months, and ...
Santara Devi vs.latish Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SANTARA DEVI RSA No.388/2015 Reserved on:21. t September, 2017 Pronounced on:26. h September, 2017 Through: Mr. Udayan Jain and Mr. Amit ..... Appellant Sherawat, Advocates. versus LATISH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.1 in the suit, Smt. Santara Devi, impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Trial Court dated 20.5.2014 and the First Appellate Court dated 22.7.2015; by which the suit for injunction filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff/Sh. Latish Kumar has been decreed and the appellant/defendant no.1 has been restrained from blocking the passage shown in yellow colour in the site plan Ex.PWin the property RSA No.388/2015 Page 1 of 20 bearing No.55, Village, Begu...
Mass Education Primary Teachers Training Institute vs.national Council ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :20. 9.2017 Judgment delivered on :26. 9.2017 + W.P.(C) 9878/2016 MASS EDUCATION PRIMARY TEACHERS TRAINING INSTITUTE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr MayankManish, Adv versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Adv for NCTE. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1... Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 02.5.2016 passed by the Eastern Regional Committee (respondent no.2) which was affirmed on 02.9.2016 by its Appellate Authority, National Council for Teacher Education (respondent no.1). 2... Petitioner is an educational institution situated in West Bengal (India). It had been granted recognition for running diploma in elementary education (D.El.Ed.) course by respondent no.2 in the year 2009. Record shows that W.P.(C) 9878/2016 Page 1 of 11 on 29.5.2015 the petitioner institute had applied (online) to respondent no.2 seeking recogni...
Mrs. Shanti Rani Kohli Dugal vs.the State& Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~15 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 99/2015 MRS. SHANTI RANI KOHLI DUGAL ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Prashant Parihar, Advocate versus THE STATE& ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocate for R-2 to 4. Date of Decision :26. h September, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present petition has been filed under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 for grant of probate of Will dated 27th March, 2009 by the Executor appointed by the Testator.2. It is stated that late Sh. Avinash Chander Kohli s/o Late Shri Chaman Lal Kohli was resident of Huns Farms, Kapashera, Najafgarh Road, Bijwasan, New Delhi.3. It is further stated that the wife of the late Sh. Avinash Chander Kohli died on 11th October, 1992.4. It is also stated that late Sh. Avinash Chander Kohli executed his only Will dated 27th March, 2009 duly notarised in respect of his movable and Page 1 of 10 TEST.CAS.99/2015 immovable properties in th...
Pradeep Kumar and Ors. Vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8689/2017 % Date of Judgment:26. h September, 2017 PRADEEP KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.N.K.Sahoo and Ms.Kumkum, versus Advocates NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ORS. Through: Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: Counsel, NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Mishra and Mr.Chetan Sharma, Advocates. Mr.Udit Gupta, Adv. for GNCTD. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) Fifteen petitioners have filed the present writ petition seeking a direction 1. to the respondents to restore the status-quo ante of the petitioners as on 12.05.2017 by allowing the petitioners to return to their respective places of squatting i.e. Gate No.3 and 4, Palika Bazar, Connaught Place, New Delhi.2. On an advance copy having been served, Mr. Peechara, counsel for the respondent-NDMC, enters appearance. Mr.Peechara submits that the present writ petition is not maintainable and shoul...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.bijendra Narain Waha ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~R-268 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.804/2010 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prasad, Advocate with Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate. versus BIJENDRA NARAIN WAHAL Through: Nemo. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent, a retired bank employee, then aged about 62 years, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 20.03.2008. He instituted accident claim case (MACT No.19/2010) on 10.02.2009 impleading the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) and its employee Krishan Kumar (driver) as respondents with the allegations that the accident had occurred due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.UP- 16P-9745 (the bus) of the UPSRTC (the appellant) by its said employee. The appellant and its employee contested the claim case, taking the position that the accident had occurred due to neg...
Jaspal Singh vs.geeta Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~R-274 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.831/2010 JASPAL SINGH Through: None. versus GEETA DEVI & ORS. Through: None. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Shailender Tanti @ Shailender Prashad indisputably suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred at about 10.00 a.m. on 23.07.2007 and died in the consequence. The accident claim case (suit no 369/2007) instituted on 27.11.2007 by his wife and other members of the family dependent on him, they being first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants), sought compensation under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, on the averments that the accident had been caused due to negligent driving of Tata Indica car bearing registration No.DL1 8866 (the car) by the appellant, he having been impleaded in the said case as first respondent, in addition to other parties, they being described as the registered o...
Ravinder Kumar Chauhan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:10. 07.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:26. 09.2017 CRL.A.303/2012 RAVINDER KUMAR CHAUHAN ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Verma and Mr. Narsingh Narain, Advocates versus STATE ... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Naik, APP for the State CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal instituted under the provisions of section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as CrPC), assails the judgment and order on sentence dated 09.08.2011, rendered by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case no.137/09. CRL.A.303/2012 Page 1 of 49 2. By way of the impugned judgement and order on sentence dated 09.08.2011, Ravinder Kumar Chauhan (hereinafter referred to as 'appellant') was convicted and sentenced under the provision of section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') to life imprisonment alo...
Amal Sharma vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~1 (Part-heard) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 9583/2016 & CM No.38400/2016 Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2017 AMAL SHARMA versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Rakesh Mishra, Adv. : Mr Akhil Sibal, Amicus Curie Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv. for GNCTD Mr Vivek Tandon for Canara Bank Mr. Gaurav Bahl, Adv. for R-3 Mr.Jagdev Singh, Mr. K.S. Negi and Mr. Sachin Saini, Advs. for R-4 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner had filed this petition seeking direction to the Canara Bank to release funds from the amount lying in the bank account of Dr. Abha Chaudhary. W.P.(C) 9583/2016 Page 1 of 5 2.3. Dr. Abha Chaudhary was in a stage of coma. Substantial amount was required for settling the medical bills and for her treatment.4. The petitioner claims to be the husband of Dr...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.rajesh Sah & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.83/2016 & CM No.3061/2016 (stay) ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv. versus RAJESH SAH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 01.12.2014 due to negligence of bus bearing registration No.DL1C2966 it admittedly being insured against third party risk for the period in question with appellant insurance company (insurer). On his accident claim case (suit No.33/2015), the tribunal held inquiry, and by judgment dated 23.10.2015 awarded compensation of Rs. 28,07,000/- directing the insurer to pay with interest @ 9% per annum, the said amount having been calculated thus:-"S.No.Heads Compensation 1. Medicines & Medical treatment Rs.1,75,000/- MAC Appeal No.83/2016 Page 1 of 5 2.3. 4.5. 6.7. 8.2. Pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »