Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rudal @ Jasan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 878/2013 RUDAL @ JASAN Date of Judgment:26. h September, 2017 ........ Petitioner STATE Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP with Inspector Yashpal Singh, PS Naraina, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C) filed against the judgment dated 21.01.2013, by which the appellant stands convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and the order on sentence dated 31.01.2013, by which the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.2. The case of the prosecution, as noticed by the Trial Court is that a PCR call was received from ...
Asha Wazir vs.apex Apartments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2296/2013 ASHA WAZIR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajan Tyagi, Advocate with Mr. Desh Deepak Tyagi, Advocate. versus APEX APARTMENTS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Arun Vohra with Ms.Aakriti Vohra, Advocates. % Date of Decision:26. h September, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for specific performance of contract, mandatory and permanent injunction and damages in respect of allotment letter and agreement to sell both dated 28th September, 1989, in respect of Flat No.T-2, 3rd Floor, at No.E-480, Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi for a sum of Rs. 8,55,000.2. This Court vide order dated 17th November, 2014 framed a preliminary issue and ordered as under: 1. Whether the suit is barred by limitation?. OPD xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx CS(OS) 2296/2013 Page 1 of 11 It is agreed by the learned counsel for the parties that issue No.1 be treated as a preliminary issue. They...
Ashish Sharma vs.raj Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~R-277 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.848/2010 ASHISH SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate with Mr. Yogesh Narula, Advocate RAJ KUMAR & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Gaur, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant, then 22 years old, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 18.10.2004 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.DL-1PB-1850, admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer). On his accident claim case (Suit No.1227/2007), instituted on 04.04.2007, the tribunal, by its judgment dated 22.07.2010, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.5,75,900/- with interest @ eight per cent (8%) per annum, directing the insurer to pay with interest, calculating it thus:-"MAC Appeal No.848/2010 Page 1 of 4 Sl. No.1.2. 3.4.5. 6.2. Head Pain, shock and suffering Expendit...
Union of India & Anr vs.shashi Kant & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7379/2017 Date of Decision:26. h September, 2017. ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through Mr.Kirtiman Singh, Adv. with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Adv., Mr.Prateek Dhanda, Adv. & Mr.Vikramaditya Singh, Adv. versus SHASHI KANT & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.S.K. Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Vikram Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER2609.2017 1. The petitioner-Union of India has filed the present petition assailing the order dated 6th March, 2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.1456/2015. The Tribunal has allowed the said Original Application preferred by the respondents to the extent that, they have been held entitled to pay fixation at the level of minimum entry pay applicable to Direct Recruits (DRs) to the post of Assistant Accounts Officer, along WP(C) No.7379/2017 Page 1 of 17 with grade pay of Rs.4800/-from the date o...
State vs.pradeep Kumar @ Depak Mandal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P.463/2017 STATE Date of Decision:26. 09.2017 Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. ........ Petitioner Versus PRADEEP KUMAR @ DEPAK MANDAL ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present leave petition instituted on behalf of the State, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) assails the judgment dated 27th July, 2016, rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, (North-East), Karkardooma Courts Complex, New Delhi, thereby acquitting the sole respondent in case titled as State vs. Pradeep Kumar @ Deepak Mandal; arising out of FIR No.459/2011 under SectionsIndian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC).2. Briefly encapsulated, the case of the prosecution is that the complainant Sukhlal (PW-2) lodged a missing person report on Crl. L.P. 463/2017 Page 1 of 9 23rdNovember, 2011, in...
Mrs. Usha Jain vs.aditya Landcon Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d September, 2017 Pronounced on:26. h September, 2017 CO.PET. 301/2015 & CA Nos.1377-78/2015 MRS. USHA JAIN ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Sr Advocate with Ms.Ruby Singh Ahuja, Mr.Nakul Gandhi, Ms.Aditi Gandhi, and Mr.Sharvan Sahay, Advocates. versus ADITYA LANDCON PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Ujjwal K Jha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The petitioner Smt.Usha Jain is the wife of late Shri D. K. Jain and is the sole beneficiary under the Will dated 11.12.2004 of her deceased husband and as such has filed this company petition.2. The respondent company had entered into an agreement to sale and purchase for total sale consideration of `16.09 Crore in respect of plot bearing No.191, Block B, NOIDA, Phase II, admeasuring 15000 square meters with the husband of the petitioner, who paid a sum of `5.40 Crore as an advance amount vide a cheque bearing No.4...
Sh. Shashi Kant Prop. Of Mani Builder vs.era Infra Engineering Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ARB.P. 492/2017 Judgment delivered on:26. 09.2017 SH. SHASHI KANT PROP. OF MANI BUILDER ....... Petitioner ERA INFRA ENGINEERING LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Ms Prerna Sinha and Mr Hasib-ur-Rehman Mr Manoj Singh, Mr Palash Taing and Mr Rahul Pandey CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2609.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner, by this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.2. The petitioner was awarded a Contract for a project at the work site of TF005, Haridwar Highway Project (SH: drain work). Work orders were issued to the petitioner.3. As per the petitioner, during execution of the work, disputes arose, inter alia, with regard to the payment for the works executed, leading to the petitio...
M/S Visual Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd vs.m/s T G Angles Media Pvt Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h September , 2017 CS(COMM) 974/2016 M/S VISUAL TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. J.K. Jain, Advocate versus M/S T G ANGLES MEDIA PVT LTD .....Defendant Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The plaintiff company has instituted the present suit against the defendant, praying inter alia for a money decree of 2,73,31,661/- (Rupees Two crores seventy three lakhs thirty one thousand six hundred and sixty one only) along with pendente lite and future interest @ 13.75% p.a., in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant, from the date of filing of the suit till its realization.2. Briefly stated, plaintiff is a company duly incorporated under the Companies Act. Plaintiff company is a distributor for the products of professional and broadcast video and auto equipment such as camera, software, tapes, cables, VTR and various allied products manufactur...
Cse Infra vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~OS-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % Date of decision:26. 09.2017 + ARB.P. 186/2017 CSE INFRA Through Mr.Vivekanand, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr.N.Prashana Kumar Nair, Adv. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties. The case of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 on behalf of respondent No.1 invited tenders for execution of work named and styled as Construction of Two Lane Road overbridge in lieu of an existing level crossing No.-524-C AT Km 1570/18-20 near Chodiala Station alongwith other allied works on Laksar-Sharanpur Section. The tender of the petitioner was accepted and the work was awarded to the petitioner vide letter dated 18.4.2013 by respondent No.2. A formal agreement was executed on 19.9.2013. ARB.P.186/2017 ...
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.bimla Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2017
$~R-271 & 272 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h September, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.819/2010 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prasahad & Mr. versus Shadab Khan, Advs. BIMLA DEVI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mainee, Adv. for R-1 & 2. + MAC APPEAL No.363/2015 BIMLA DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mainee, Adv. versus UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Garima Prasahad & Mr. Shadab Khan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Manish Verma, aged 19 years, concededly a matriculate and bachelor, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 02.12.2007 due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.MAC Appeal No.819/2010 & conn. Page 1 of 5 UP21 0629 of Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) and died in the consequence. His widowed mother and sibling, they being appellants in MAC A...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »