Delhi Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudesh Kumari vs.ramesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t September, 2017. RC.REV. No.409/2017 and CM No.31866/2017 (for stay) SUDESH KUMARI Through: Mr. Deepak Anand ........ Petitioner and Mr. Aayushmaan, Advs. Versus RAMESH KUMAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. ..... Respondent CM No.31865/2017 (for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RC.REV. No.409/2017 and CM No.31866/2017 (for stay).3. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order (dated 2nd March, 2017 in E.No.1(Old No.4/2015) of the Court of Additional Rent Controller, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi) dismissing the application of the petitioner / tenant for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent / landlord and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner / tenant from one room and toilet on the second...
Air India Limited vs.neeta Khungar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~3 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No.454/2017 AIR INDIA LIMITED Reserved on:23. d August, 2017 Date of Decision:1. t September, 2017 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Ms. Bhavana, Advocates. versus NEETA KHUNGAR ..... Respondent Through Ms. Maninder Acharya, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Air India Limited, in this intra court appeal, by way of Letters Patent, impugns the order dated 27th March, 2017 passed in W.P.(C) No.2354/2004, Neeta Khungar versus Air India Limited.2. The impugned order directs the appellant, Air India Ltd., to grant monetary emoluments to the respondent before us for the post of Additional Senior Check Air Hostess from 4th January, 2001, with the further direction that the respondent would also be entitled to all consequential monetary benefits. LPA No.454/2017 Page...
Vinay Agarwal vs.state Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3516/2017 VINAY AGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Aman Khan, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for State along with SI Ajit Singh, PS Greater Kailash, Delhi. Mr.Sheikh Israr Ahmad, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0109.2017 Crl.M.A. 14337/2017 (exemption) % Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3516/2017 1. Notice. Learned APP, who appears on an advance copy having been served, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She is present in court and accepts notice. She is being represented by her counsel. She is duly identified by IO SI Ajit Singh. The petitioner has approached this court under Section 482 of the 2.3. CRL.M.C.3516/2017 Page 1 of 3 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the F...
Director in Charge Esi Corporation and Ors vs.m/s Delkan Buildtech (P) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2388/2017 Judgment reserved on :30. h August, 2017 Date of decision :01. t September, 2017 DIRECTOR IN CHARGE ESI CORPORATION AND ORS ........ Petitioner Through Mr. A.K. Verma, Advocate versus M/S DELKAN BUILDTECH (P) LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Gopi Chand, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The writ petition bearing W.P. (C) 2388/2017 has been filed by the petitioners Director-In-Charge, ESI Corporation, Recovery Officer, ESIC and Regional Director, ESIC, whereby they have assailed the impugned order dated 04.11.2016 of the ASCJ/JSCC/G. Judge (East), Delhi whereby the petitioners application under Order 6 rule 17 CPC, 1908 as amended was dismissed observing to the effect that merely because one of the Directors of the petitioner was also the owner of another Proprietorship concern, had no relevance to the W.P.(C) 2388/2017 Page 1 of 7 liability of the petitioner.2. Through the petition, it ...
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd(na ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 09.2017 + OMP (COMM.) 328/2017 NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD(NAFED) ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. Prashanto Sen, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar Adv. and Mr. Anurag Tiwari, Law Officer of the... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Munjal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Mr. Sandeep Bisht and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0109.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) IA100182017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. OMP (COMM.) 328/2017 and IA100172017 (Stay) 1. The petitioner by this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugns the Award dated 01st May, 2017. OMP (COMM.)328/2017 Page 1 of 17 2. By the impugned Awar...
Manoj Bhardwaj vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~24 * + 1.2. 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1145/2017 MANOJ BHARDWAJ......... Petitioner Through Mr. Vipin Kumar Anand, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State Mr. Raghav Chadha, Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Baisoya, authorised representative of respondent No.2-comapny. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER0109.2017 % Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has handed over a copy of General Power of Attorney dated 05.07.2017 in favour of Mr. Pradeep Baisoya. Same is taken on record. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.79/2015, registered on 18.01.2015 against him with Police Station Neb Sarai, South District, Delhi, under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003 on th...
Pramod Kumar Jaiswal vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:23. 05.2017 Judgment Pronounced On:01. 09.2017 CRL.A. 740/2014 PRAMOD KUMAR JAISWAL ...Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Inspector Kusum Lata, P.S. Dwarka, South. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal instituted under the provisions of section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the CrPC) assails the judgment dated 19.04.2014 and the order on sentence dated 22.04.2014, rendered by the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, Delhi. By way of the impugned judgment dated 19.04.2014 and the order on CRL.A.740/2014 Page 1 of 27 sentence dated 22.04.2014, the appellant has been convicted for the commission of offences punishable under the provision of section 302, of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (h...
National Highways Authority of India vs.bbel-mipl (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 26th July 2017 Judgment delivered on 1st September 2017 + FAO (OS) 141/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhijat, Dr.Maurya Vijay Chandra, Mr.Nikhil Parikshit Advs. versus BBEL-MIPL (JV) . Respondent Through: Ms.Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Hitendra Nath Rath, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT0109.2017 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. This appeal, under clause (c) of Section 37(i) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugns order, dated 23rd November, 2016, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed OMP3502015, filed by the appellant herein under Section 34 of the Act, per consequence affirming award, dated 27th February, 2015, passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the dispute between the appellant and the respondent.2. The challenge, before the learned Single Judge, as wel...
Indiacan Education Pvt. Ltd. Vs.sai Education Centre & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 09.2017 ARB.P. 331/2017 INDIACAN EDUCATION PVT. LTD. versus SAI EDUCATION CENTRE & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms.Shubham Mahajan, Adv. : Ms.Pooja Dheer and Ms.Siddhartha, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seek appointment of an independent Sole Arbitrator.2. The respondent company was appointed as a licencee by the petitioner by MOU dated 22nd March, 2013 to establish and authorize learning centre of the petitioner company.3. Certain disputes have arisen between the parties. The petitioner has invoked the Arbitral Clause by letter dated 19th May, 2015. ARB. PET.331/2017 Page 1 of 3 4. The Arbitration Clause between ...
Union of India and Ors. Vs.sanjay Kumar Naik and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2017
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.9413/2016 Pronounced on:1st September, 2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. T.P. Singh, Mr. Sahaj Garg, Advocates. versus SANJAY KUMAR NAIK AND ORS. Through Mr. V.S. R. Krishna, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1473/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj and Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocates. Versus SANDEEP KUMAR SWAROOP AND ORS...Respondents Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N. Raja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR + % W.P. (C) Nos. 9413/2016 & 1473/2017 Page 1 of 46 SANJIV KHANNA, J.The question raised in the Writ Petition No.9413/2016 and Writ Petition No.1473/2017 is whether the respondents (except Sandeep Kumar Swaroop), who are working as Assistant Hydrogeologists, a Group B post in the Central Ground Water Board (CGWB for short), a...
- ‹ Prev
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 101
- 102
- Next ›
- Last »