Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neha Sagar vs.chetan Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 152/2017 & C.M. Nos. 31185-86/2017 NEHA SAGAR Through: Mr. Anand Prakash, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus CHETAN CHAUDHARY Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER3008.2017 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, assailing an order dated 30.3.2017, granting her interim maintenance @ Rs.8,000/- per month from the date of filing the application, till the disposal of the main petition filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 along with litigation expenses of Rs.20,000/-.2. On enquiring from learned counsel for the appellant, he states that an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by the appellant against the respondent before the concerned court at Ghaziabad, that has granted her maintenance @ Rs.3,000/- per month. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant had filed a revision petition befor...
Ramphal vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~1, 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:30. h August, 2017 CRL.L.P. 275/2014 STATE Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ........ Petitioner State with Inspr. Arvind Sharma, P.S. R. K. Puram versus UPENDER & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajender Singh, Advocate for R- 1, 5 and 8. Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nikilesh R. , Mr. Navdeep Vain, Ms. Maisha, Mr. Archana Gupta and Ms. Vailashai Tanwar, Advocate for R-4 Mr. Mohd. Talha, Advocate for R-7 + CRL.L.P. 121/2016 RAMPHAL Through Mr. P. K. Dey, Ms. Shreyasi, ........ Petitioner versus Chakrborty and Ms. Shilpi Dey, Advocates STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with Inspr. Arvind Sharma, P.S. R. K. Puram Mr. Mohd. Talha, Advocate for R-8 Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wavi, Advocate for R-4/Davinder Sharma Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nikilesh R. , Mr. Navdeep Vain, Ms. Maisha, Mr. Archana Gupta and Crl. L.P.275/2014 etc. P...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.renu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~R-147 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h August, 2017 + MAC APPEAL6302009 and CM186932009 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Adv. versus RENU & ORS. Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The award, by the impugned judgment dated 18.08.2009, in favour of the first to fourth respondents (collectively, the claimants) on their claim petition (MACT claim petition no.191/08) on account of death of Chattarpal Singh includes award on account of loss of dependency, the claim of the petitioners being that the deceased was working with M/s. M.S. Steel Welding Works as a welder.2. The insurance company on which the liability to pay has been fastened, questions the calculation by the impugned judgment on the ground that no cogent proof of such employment was adduced. It is, however, noted that the tribunal instead of going by the pleadings of the claimants about the employment as w...
d.t.c. Vs.pritam Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :30. h August, 2017 W.P.(C) 8448/2007 D.T.C. PRITAM LAL (through LRs) Through Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel ........ Petitioner versus Through Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Mr. Sagar ..... Respondent Chaturvedi, Advs. Through Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel ........ Petitioner W.P.(C) 8469/2007 D.T.C. PRITAM LAL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA versus Through Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Mr. Sagar Chaturvedi, Advs. ..... Respondent JUDGMENT (ORAL) ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. Both these petitions W.P.(C) 8448/2007 and W.P.(C) 8469/2007 relate to claim of the workman, i.e. Sh. Pritam Lal (since deceased and now represented by his legal heirs) in relation to I.D. No.186/1995, upheld vide Award dated 09.06.1998, and implementation that of LCA No.78/2000, disposed of vide order dated 28.02.2006, and thus both these petitions W.P.(C) 8448/2007 W.P.(C) 8448/2007 & W.P.(C) 8469/2007 Page 1 of 6 and W.P.(C) 8469/2007 are taken up...
Ravi Shankar @ Harish & Ors vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~35 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2457/2017 RAVI SHANKAR @ HARISH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankur Sood, Advocate with Ms. Kirat Randhawa, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate with SI Jagdeep, P.S. Swaroop Nagar, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % Crl.M.A. 14071/2017 (exemption) ORDER3008.2017 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2457/2017 1. Notice. Learned ASC for the State, who appears on an advance copy, accepts the notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She is present and accepts the notice. She is duly identified by the IO SI Jagdeep. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court 2.3. W.P. (Crl.) 2457/2017 Page 1 of 3 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973...
Rajeshwar Pathak vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~24 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30. h August, 2017 CRL.A. 1149/2016 RAJESHWAR PATHAK ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State along with SI Sumit, P.S. Begumpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated 10.08.2016 in Sessions Case No.183/2013, FIR No.207/2013, P.S. Begum Pur, by virtue of which the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and the order on sentence dated 22.08.2016 by which the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for 06 months...
Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5807/2014 Reserved on :17. h August, 2017 Decision on :30th August, 2017 SWAROVSKI INDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M. S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi and Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE No.7(1), NEW DELH. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT % Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The... Petitioner seeks quashing of a notice dated 25th March, 2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as the Act) by which the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT) sought to re-assess the... Petitioner's income for the Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08 on the ground that the income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment, within the meaning of Section 147 of the Act. Background facts 2. The... Petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing, productio...
Harichand and Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
Kamini Vashistha vs.dinesh Vashistha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI KAMINI VASHISTHA $~26 * + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 156/2017 & C.M. Nos. 31465-66/2017 DINESH VASHISTHA Through: Mr. Sumit Rastogi, Advocate Through: versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER3008.2017 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, assailing an order dated 9.5.2017, passed by the learned Family Court rejecting her application for increasing the number of visitation days in respect of her minor daughter, who is in custody of the respondent.2. After addressing arguments at some length, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal.3. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J DEEPA SHARMA, J AUGUST30 2017/ap...
Mahendra vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »