Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Niwas vs.ram Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~R-149 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC APPEAL6352009 Decided on:30. h August, 2017 RAM NIWAS ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate versus RAM SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 09.07.2005 involving negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.HR-38E-9885 and instituted accident claim case (petition no.04/2009) on 05.12.2005 seeking compensation.2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), after inquiry, by judgment dated 11.09.2009, upheld the claim for compensation on the principle of fault liability and awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.13,94,000/- in his favour directing the third respondent (the insurer of the offending vehicle) to pay though accepting its plea of breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy also granting it recovery rights aga...
Union of India & Anr vs.chhagan Lal Meena & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) No.6605 /2017 & CM Nos.27370-27371/2017 Date of Decision:30. h August, 2017. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ....... Petitioners Through: Mr.R.V. Sinha, Adv. & Mr.Ashok Singh, Adv. Versus CHHAGAN LAL MEENA & ANR. Through: Nemo. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI , J (ORAL) CM Nos.27370/2017 1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. WP(C) No.6605/2017 2. The petitioner-Union of India has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 21st April, 2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) in OA No.276/2016 & OA No.277/2016. WP(C) No.6605/2017 Page 1 of 8 The Tribunal has allowed the said original applications by the common order.3. The present petition is directed against the order passed in OA No.277/2016. The respondent-applicant, who was serving as the Chief Office Superintendent (C...
s.k.shah vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 1156/2017 Date of decision:30. h August, 2017 S.K.SHAH Through: Mr.Padma Kumar S., Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Saroha, Ms.Shivangi Sinha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) The petitioners service career has a chequered history. We need not refer to same in detail, in view of the limited controversy involved.2. The petitioner had retired from Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB for short) as Second In Command (2IC) on 30th November, 2009. WP(C) 1156/2017 Page 1 3. The petitioner on the date of retirement was facing disciplinary proceedings in the charge sheet dated 22nd August, 2007.4. By order dated 17th January, 2011, penalty of withholding 20% of pension for 5 years was inflicted under Rule 9 of the Central Service (Pension) Rules, 1972.5. The penalty order was successfully challen...
Dharmveer and Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
Rusan Pharma Ltd. Vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:02. 08.2017 Pronounced on:30. 08.2017 + W.P.(C) 5596/2016 RUSAN PHARMA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Bindu Saxena, Mr. Shailendra Swarup and Ms. Aparajita Swarup, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms. Nidhi Parashar, GP for R-1. Mr. Ashish Kumar Kushwaha, Consultant (Proc.), Procurement Div. for UOI. Mr. Divij Soni, Adv. for Mr. Rohit Goel, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Facts 1. The... Petitioner questions the award of contract/tender to the second respondent (hereafter referred to in brief as Verve) by the Union of India in the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, National AIDS Control Organization, the first respondent (NACO hereafter). NACO published a W.P.(C) No.5596/2016 Page 1 of 20 tender being IFB No.RITE...
Manik Kumar vs.state Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~34 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C. 1803/2017 & Crl.M.A. No.7355/2017(stay) MANIK KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Awnish Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State alongwith SI Manoj Kumar from Police Station I.G.I. Airport. % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER3008.2017 1. The present petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.0447/2016, under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station IGI Airport, New Delhi.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 28.11.2016 a complaint was received at P.S. IGI Airport, Delhi from the Assistant Security Officer/Lakhvinder Singh, alleging that during screening 5 live cartridges of .32 bore kept in a match box were detected and recovered from the check-in baggage of the petitioner. On that day, the peti...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.usha & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 185/2016 and CM APPL.7023/2016 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. .... Appellant Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar proxy counsel for Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus USHA & ANR. Through: Mr. Mayank Khurana, ........ RESPONDENTS Advocate for R-1. Ms. Mamta, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.1. Usha, the first respondent, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 01.09.2012, involving a motor vehicle described as tractor bearing registration no.HR-13B-4156, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer). On her claim petition (Suit No.348/2012), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the tribunal), by judgment dated 08.01.2016, granted compensation in the sum of Rs.4,10,575.10p directing the insurance company to pay with interest @ nine per cent (9%) per annum. MAC Appeal No.185/2016 Page 1 of 3 2. The insu...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ITA No.372 of 2015 Reserved on:2. d August, 2017 Date of decision:30. h August, 2017 .....Appellant Through: Mr. M. S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi and Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr. Anand K. Chaudhuri, Advocates versus + + COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (LTU), NEW DELHI .....Appellant ITA No.447 of 2015 ITA No.448 of 2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel and Mr. Anand K. Chaudhuri, Advocates. versus .....Respondent Through: Mr. M. S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi and Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates. JUDGMENT CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ITAs 372/2015, 447/2015 and 448/2015 Page 1 of 22 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are three appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) directed agains...
Chandermal and Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:20. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:30. 08.2017 % + W.P.(C) 1103/2016 MAHENDRA ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C) 1104/2016 DHARMVEER AND ORS W.P.(C) 1112/2016 HARICHAND AND ORS W.P.(C) 1114/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS W.P.(C) 7126/2016 VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Advocate with Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh K. Mishra, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1103, 1114 & 7126/2016. Mr. Sharan Thakur & Ms. Natasha Thakur, Advocates for DDA in W.P.(C) 1103, 1104, 1112 & 1114/2016. Mr. Mukesh Sachdeva, Advocate for UOI in W.P.(C) 7126/2016. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1104/2016. Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate for L&B/LAC in W.P.(C)1112/2016. W.P.(C)1103/2016 with connected matters Page 1 of 14 CORAM: HON'BL...
Tarsem & Anr vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2078/2017 TARSEM & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Malika Parmar, Advocate for Ms. Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State along with SI Dalbir Singh, P.S. Mahendra Park, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER3008.2017 Respondent No.2 is present in the Court. She is duly identified by the IO SI Dalbir Singh. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.40/2016, registered on 20.01.2016 with Police Station Mahendra Park, Delhi, under Sections 498A/34 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. It is submitted that the marriage of respondent No.2 with one Yashpal was solemnized on 17.11.2003...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »