Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohammad Usman vs.vice Chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamiya University ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 380/2016 & CM475572016 Date of decision:31. t August, 2017 MOHAMMAD USMAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Naushad Alam, Adv. along with appellant in person. versus VICE CHANCELLOR OF JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIYA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr.Amit George, Ms.Himanshi Gupta, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 2nd March, 2016 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the application of the appellant to sue as an indigent person.2. The appellant had filed civil suit for damages of Rs. 35 crores against the Vice Chancellor, the Controller of Examinations and the Head of the Department, Electrical, Faculty of Engineering, of the Jamia Millia Islamia University.3. We have heard Mr. Naushad Alam, Advocate appointed by the State Legal Services Committee and the appellant who is FAO(OS) 380/2016 Page ...
Kuldeep Garg &Ors. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
$~50 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2475/2017 KULDEEP GARG &ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sharad Kochar with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, SC with Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocate with SI Tejvir Singh, P.S. Welcome, Delhi. Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Verma, Advocate alongwith respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER3108.2017 Crl.M.A. 14232/2017 (exemption) % Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2475/2017 1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Articleof the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.157/2015, registered on 23.03.2015 against them with Police Station Welcome Colony, North East, Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry W.P. (Crl.) ...
d.d.a. Vs.pratap Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t August, 2017 CM(M) No.1009/2005, CM No.7085/2005 (for stay), CM No.11166/2007 (under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC), CM No.11167/2007 (for condonation of delay), CM No.3007/2015 (for direction) and CM No.41426/2016 (for directions). D.D.A. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA. versus PRATAP SINGH & ANR Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja ........ RESPONDENTS and Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. for LRs of R-1. Mr. K.B. Soni, Adv. for R-2. Ms. Sapna S. Kapil, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order (dated 2nd February, 2005 in Suit No.451/of the Court of Civil Judge, Delhi) of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner Delhi Development Authority (DDA) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay in applying under Order IX Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for h...
In the Matter of Madan Associates Pvt. Ltd. (In Vol. Liqn.) Vs.....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:18. h August, 2017 Pronounced on:31. t August, 2017 CO.PET. No.45/2017 IN THE MATTER OF MADAN ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. (IN VOL. LIQN.) ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Rishi Manchanda, Advocate for Official Liquidator. versus .... + ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This is a petition under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter as the Act) by the Official Liquidator, seeking voluntary winding up of Madan Associates Private Limited (hereinafter as petitioner company).2. The petitioner company was incorporated on 12.03.1973 having Corporate Identity Number U99999DL1973PTC006512, under the provisions of the Act with the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana with the authorized Share Capital of `1,00,000/- divided into 1,000 equity shares of `100/- each. CO.PET. No.45/2017 Page 1 of 4 3. The registered office of the company is situated at C-15A, Kai...
Yum! Restaurants Asia pte.ltd. Vs.deputy Director of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 614/2014 YUM! RESTAURANTS ASIA PTE.LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate with Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Mr. Sanat Kapoor, Advocates. Versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr.Standing Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % ORDER3108.2017 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This writ petition by the Yum Restaurants Asia PTE Ltd. seeks the quashing of a notice dated 28th March, 2013 issued by the Deputy Director of Income Tax (Assessing Officer - AO) under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2006-07. It also challenges the order dated 26th December, 2013 passed by the AO rejecting the objection filed by the Assessee to the reopening of the assessment.2. One of the grounds of challenge to the re-opening of the assessment is that since the return originally filed was processed under Section 143...
Lalit Kumar vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 932/2017 LALIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: versus THE STATE Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate. ....Respondent Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER3108.2017 1. By way of the present petition filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.') the petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No.46/2014 under Sections 420/468/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC'), registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, Delhi. The petitioner is stated to be in judicial custody since 20.10.2016. Status report is on record.2. The present complaint has been lodged in respect of a land deal whereby the petitioner alongwith other co-accused persons entered into an agreement for sale of a certain piece of land to the three complainants and 8 others. It is alleged that the said land was non-transferable but was...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.tarun & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 823/2015 and CM238912015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus TARUN & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar and Ms. Pankaj Kumari, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appeal at hand has been filed by the insurance company, it concededly being the insurer against third party risk in respect of the motor vehicle described as Maruti Gypsy bearing registration on.HR- 26H-4656 assailing the judgment dated 27.07.2015 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) on the accident claim case (suit no.288/12) of the first respondent (claimant), inter alia, on the ground that it could not have been fastened with the liability to pay the compensation since the party it had contracted with in terms of the insurance policy was Devender Kumar Gupta, who was not impleaded as a party respondent. MAC Appeal No.823/...
Samar Bahadur & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
$~36 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2086/2017 SAMAR BAHADUR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Kumar Nikhil, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State with SI Omveer Singh, PS Nand Nagri, Delhi. Mr.Ravish Roshan, Advocate for R-2 to R-5 with respondent No.2 to 5 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER3108.2017 The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.959/2016, registered on 05.11.2016 with Police Station Nand Nagri, Delhi, under Sections 452/3IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2. As per the allegations, an altercation took place between the petitioners and the respondent No.2 to 5 on 01.11.2016 and the respondent No.2 to 5 sustained injuries. Respondent No.2 to 5 ...
Kanishk Sharma & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
$~27 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 872/2017 KANISHK SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Shafiq Khan, Adv. with Mr.Tanveer Khaleeq, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (criminal) for State with Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Adv. with SI Chhotelal, P.S. Punjabi Bagh. Mr.Mohd. Khadim Khan, Adv. for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % 1.2. ORDER3108.2017 Respondent No.2 is present in the Court. She is duly identified by the IO SI Chhotelal. She is being represented by her counsel. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.673/2016, registered against them on 10.11.2016 with Police Station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC, on the complaint of respondent No.2. W.P. (Crl.) ...
Indian Association of Tour Operators vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + INDIAN ASSOCIATION OF TOUR OPERATORS W.P.(C) No.5267 of 2013 Reserved on: August 03, 2017 Date of decision: August 31, 2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. J.K. Mittal & Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal and Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Mr. Amit Bansal and Mr. Amit Kulshrestha, Advocates for Respondent No.3. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. This writ petition by the Indian Association of Tour Operators, seeks a declaration that Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 (ST Rules), concerning Export of services is ultra vires the Finance Act 1994 (FA). The validity of Section 94 2 (f) of the FA is also challenged on the ground that it gives unguided and uncontrolled power to the central government to frame rules regarding provisions for determining export of taxable WP (C) 52...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »