Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mintu Kumar ..... Appellant vs.state Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~R- * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 44/2014 Judgment reserved on :22. d August, 2017 Judgment pronounced on:28. h August, 2017 MINTU KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sandhu, Advocate versus STATE GNCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Crl. M. A. No.8461/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL.A. 44/2014 1. The present appeal has been instituted under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the impugned judgment dated 07.11.2013 and order on sentence dated 11.11.2013 by which the appellant has been convicted for the offences under Section 328, 366, 368 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC). The present appellant has been sentenced to undergo:-"(i) rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years with fine of Rs.4,000/-, in default thereof to further undergo rigorous...
Lalit Mohan Gautam vs.university of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 4491/2017 LALIT MOHAN GAUTAM Date of decision:28. h August, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: In person versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner humbly prays for the following order and/or orders: A) A writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to consider the services of the petitioner on and from January 1, 1987 till his superannuation on December 31, 2015 and pay him his retiral benefits including pension together with all other arrears; B) A writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner dated August 24, 2013, December 5, 2013, April 7, 2014 and November 5, 2016; C) Rul...
M/S Kiran Shoes Manufacturers vs.narinder Kohli & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2017 CS(COMM) 1453/2016 M/S KIRAN SHOES MANUFACTURERS ..... Plaintiff versus NARINDER KOHLI & ANR ..... Defendants Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Pranay Sarkar with Mr. Jeetu Sharma, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Ishwinder Walia, power of attorney holder on behalf of defendant Nos.2 and 3. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) IA No.9619/2017 (under Order XXIII rule 3 CPC) 1. By this application, under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, jointly filed by the plaintiff and the defendants, it is prayed that the suit be decreed in terms of the application.2. The application is supported by an affidavit of the authorised signatory of the plaintiff as well as Mr. Ishvinder Walia, the power of attorney holder of the defendant Nos.1 and 2. Along with the CS(COMM.) 1453/2016 Page 1 of 7 application, the original Power of Attorney, iss...
Meenakshi Sharma vs.amit Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h August, 2017 + CRL.M.C. 5058/2015 & CRL.M.A.No.18213/2015 MEENAKSHI SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Prashant Mendiratta, with Mr.Harshvardhan Pandey, Advocates. versus AMIT KUMAR SHARMA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Prateek Yadav, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT I.S. MEHTA, J.1. Instant petition is preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 02.11.2015 passed by the learned ASJ-04 & Special Judge (NDPS) South East, New Delhi in CA. No.181/2015.2. The brief facts stated are that the petitioner/wife and the respondent/husband got married on 13.02.2005 and out of the wedlock one child was born to them on 09.05.2009. On 01.10.2012 the petitioner filed an application under Section 12 of the Protections of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 before the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magis...
Ravindra Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:28. h August, 2017 W.P.(C) 2165/2015 RAVINDRA SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Satyakam, ASC for respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present Petition assails orders dated 17.10.14 and 18.12.14 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.3296/2012 and RA No.225/2014, whereby the Tribunal has dismissed both the Original Application and Review Application preferred by the... Petitioner. The Original Application had been filed by the... Petitioner being aggrieved by the action of the... RESPONDENTS, rejecting his candidature for the post of Sub-Officer in Delhi Fire Service, on the ground of his being overage as the age limit was calculated without giving 3 years age relaxation to OBC candidates. WPC No.2165/2015 Pa...
Pawan Mittal & Ors vs.the State Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~49 & 51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2432/2017 PAWAN MITTAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with ASI Guman Singh, PS Shalimar Bagh, Delhi. Mr.Varun Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Sahil Munjal, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. + W.P.(CRL) 2436/2017 ANNU MITTAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Varun Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Sahil Munjal, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.S. Kundu, ASC for State with Mr.Peeyush Bhatia, Advocate along with SI Lalit Shokeen, PS Keshav Puram, Delhi. Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocate for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER2808.2017 W.P. (Crl.) 2432/2017 & 2436/2017 Page 1 of 5 VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 13900/2017 (exemption)...
Raj Kumari Sharma vs.rakesh Kumar Sharma & Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h August, 2017 Pronounced on:28. h August, 2017 CS(OS) 3206/2014 & IA No.20553/2014 RAJ KUMARI SHARMA ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Rahul Khanna, Advocate. versus Through : Mr.Anjani RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA & ANOTHER ..... Defendants Mishra, Ms.Hardeep Kaur, Mr.Shiv Kumar Tiwari, Advocates for defendant No.1. Mr.Rajan Chautani, Mr.Girish Sharma, Advocates for defendant No.2. Kr. Mr.Sanjeev Narula, and Ms.Naina Kejriwal, Advocates/Noticee in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.4055/2016 1. The dispute pertains to two properties viz (a) No.25A and 25B, Block C, Rama Park, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi admeasuring 246 square yards consisting of two rooms (hereafter referred as Uttam Nagar property) and (b) MIG Flat No.B-3/11, IA No.4055/2016 in CS(OS) No.3206/2014 1 of 10 Sector 18, Rohini, Delhi (hereafter referred as Rohini property). Both the properties were owned by Shri Madan Mohan Lal Sharma, ...
Asf Insignia Sez P. Ltd vs.punj Lloyd Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2017 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 24/2017 ASF INSIGNIA SEZ P. LTD versus PUNJ LLOYD LTD ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Dhawan with Mr. Siddharth Agrawal, Mr. S. Panda and Ms. Vanya Khanna, Advocates. For the Respondent : Ms. Niyati Kohli, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) IA No.9705/2017 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 24/2017 1. By this petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the petitioner seeks extension of time to enable the Arbitrator to consider the application for amendment of the Statement of Claims on merits. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 24/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of certain errors and omissions in the c...
Dalip Chand ..... Appellant vs.the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :28. 08.2017 + MAC.APP. 958/2014 DALIP CHAND Through: Ms. Sonia Sharma and Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocates with appellant in person ..... Appellant versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath and Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv for R-1with Mr. Pradeep Kumar Kaushik, Assistant Manager. Mr. R.C.S. Bhadoria, Adv. for R-2 + MAC.APP. 959/2014 SHRI DALIP CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sonia Sharma and Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocates with appellant in person versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath and Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv for R-1 with Mr. Pradeep Kumar Kaushik, Assistant Manager. Mr. R.C.S. Bhadoria, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) MACA9582014 & 959/2014 Page 1 of 10 1. These appeals are by the registered owner of the motor vehicle, the negligent driving of which is stated to have given rise to the cau...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »