Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Reliance General Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs.samir Ranjan Rout & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h August, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.265/2015 & CM No.4681/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. versus SAMIR RANJAN ROUT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shilpi, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The insurance company on which the liability to pay compensation in favour of the first respondent has been fastened by judgment dated 29.10.2014 in accident claim case (case No.187/2014), on account of injuries suffered in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 14.01.2011, questions the inclusion of medical expenses of Rs. 93,772/- amongst the various heads of damages on the ground that it is possible that the claimant would have secured reimbursement of the said amount from his employer. This plea, more based on apprehension, is misplaced, inasmuch as the insurance company had filed a review application which was dismis...
Kartari Devi and Ors. Vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 28, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4456/2015 KARTARI DEVI AND ORS. versus ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. N.S. Checi, Advocate UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivekanand Mishra and Mr. Rishabh Shahu, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Ms. Ridhi, Advocate for respondent-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner claims that neither possession of the subject land has been taken nor has any compensation been paid and, therefore, the petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (herei...
Naresh Khanna vs.saroj Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h August, 2017 RC.REV. 281/2017 & CM No.30865/2017 (for stay) NARESH KHANNA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. De, Mr. Rajesh Dwivedi & Ms. Ananya De, Advs. Versus ..... Respondent SAROJ GUPTA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM Nos.30866/2017 & 30867/2017 (both for exemptions) Through: Mr. O.P. Aggarwal, Adv.1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. RC.REV. 281/2017 & CM No.30865/2017 (for stay) 3. This petition, under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, impugns the order [dated 21st January, 2017 in E-(New No.79739/16) of the Court of Additional Rent Controller-02,Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner / tenant for leave to defend the petition for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act filed by the respondent and the resultant order of eviction of the petitioner / tenant from Shop No.14...
Ashutosh vs.arun Jaitley
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (OS) 234/2017 ASHUTOSH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.June Chaudhri, Sr.Adv. with Mohd. Irsad, Adv. versus ARUN JAITLEY . Respondent Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sandeep Sethi Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manik Dogra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Anoop George Chaudhri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anupam Srivastava and Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, Advs. for R-2 + FAO (OS) 235/2017 ARVIND KEJRIWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anoop George Chaudhri, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Anupam Srivastava and Mr.Rishikesh Kumar Advs. versus ARUN JAITLEY . Respondent Through: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv.with Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manik Dogra, Adv. for R-1. Ms.June Chaudhri, Sr. Adv. with Mohd. Isral, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR FAO (OS) 234 & 235/2017 Page 1 of 33 % C. Hari Shankar, J.JUDGMENT2808.2017 Oh, East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet, Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God's great ...
Kavita Kapoor vs.nitishree Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + ARB.P. 408/2017 KAVITA KAPOOR Judgment delivered on:28. 08.2017 ........ Petitioner versus NITISHREE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Ms. Apurva Upmanyu with Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Advocates. : Ms. Nivedita Jain, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2808.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner by this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996(hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeks appointment of a sole arbitrator to determine and adjudicate the disputes and claims between the parties.2. The petitioner had booked a residential plot with the respondent Company. As per the petitioner, there were delays in execution of the project and handing over of possession of the plot booked by the ARB.P. 408/2017 Page 1 of 3 petitioner, leading to disputes between the parties. The petitioner has, thus, i...
Virgin Enterprises Limited & Anr vs.virgin Foods & Feeds Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 824/2016 VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. R.K. Jain, Advocate with Dr. Amitabha Sen and Ms. Malyashree Sridharan, Advocates versus VIRGIN FOODS & FEEDS PVT LTD & ORS Through: None ..... Defendants % Reserved On :17. h August, 2017 Date of Decision:28. h August, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J :1. Present suit has been filed for permanent and temporary injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, rendition of accounts and other miscellaneous reliefs. The prayer clauses in the suit are reproduced hereinbelow:-""a. Grant an order for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners, directors, principal officers, servants, agents and representatives from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in advertising services or any other related services CS(COMM) 824/2016 Page 1 of 7 under their company/...
Hualu Engineering and Technology Co. Ltd. Vs.uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7540/2017, C.M. APPL.31112/2017 HUALU ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. Decided on :28. 08.2017 Through : Sh. S.K. Upadhyay, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Sushila Narang, Advocate, for UOI. Sh. V.N. Koura with Sh. S. Sirish Kumar, Advocate, for IOCL. Ms. Anupam Dhingra with Ms. Smitha Sehgal, Sh. Ajay Gupta and Ms. Devyani, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the cancellation of the tender issued by the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) for which the second respondent Engineers India Limited (EIL) was the PMC.2. The facts are that the Global Competitive Bidding was invited for BS-VI Project for IOCL and the invitation was published on 25.10.2016. The petitioner contends that it was one of the bidders which had applied for t...
Ram Kumar @ Ajay & Others vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2445/2017 RAM KUMAR @ AJAY & OTHERS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Malika Parmar, Advocate for Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State with ASI Jitender, P.S. New Ashok Nagar, New Delhi.... RESPONDENTS No.2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER2808.2017 % Crl.M.A. 13963/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2445/2017 1. Notice. Learned ASC for the State, who appears on an advance copy, accepts the notice.2. Notice to respondents No.2 and 3 also. They are present and accept the notice. They are duly identified by the IO ASI Jitender.3. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court W.P. (Crl.) 2445/2017 Page 1 of 3 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...
Mcf Finlease Private Limited vs.pushpa Pal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
$~R-151 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 640/2009 and CM APPL.18983/2009 versus MCF FINLEASE PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PUSHPA PAL & ORS. Through: Nemo. ... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The first respondent is stated to have suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 08.08.2006 when the scooter bearing registration No.DL-8S-AE-3154 on which she was moving came to be involved in a collision against Tata Indica car bearing registration No.DL-9CC-1376. She instituted accident claim case (Suit No.895/2008) on 12.09.2006 for compensation impleading the appellant herein as the second respondent, it being the registered owner of the said car with the averments that it was driven in a negligent manner by the second respondent herein. National Insurance Company Limited was impleaded as one of the party respondents before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Tr...
Bhagwan Dubey vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 536/2017 Date of decision:28. h August, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. with BHAGWAN DUBEY versus Ms. Shruti Munjal, Adv. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) Bhagwan Dubey was appointed as a Constable on 07.06.1981 and promoted as Head Constable on 10.10.1997.2. The petitioner was denied second financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme as he had not undergone the requisite pre-promotional course, before completion of 24 years of service.3. Delhi High Court vide decision dated 06.09.2013 in WP(C) 5539/2013, Jaipal Singh and Others vs. Union of India and Others, has held that those not short-listed for pre-promotional course, would not be denied financial upgradation. Ministry of Home WP(C) 536/2017 Page 1 Affairs on 16.02.2015 issued clarif...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »