Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagjit Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
* % + AND + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 23, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: August 29, 2017 CRL.A. 840/2001 JASBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar CRL.A. 398/2002 JAGJIT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus STATE AND + ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar. CRL.A. 399/2002 VIRENDRA SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus STATE ..... Respondent CRL.A.Nos.840/2001, 398/2002 & 399/2002 Page 1 of 18 Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT1 Feeling aggrieved by their conviction and sentence awarded vide judgment dated 19th October, 2001 and order on sentence dated 23rd October, 2001 passed in Sessions...
Saranjit Singh Bhatia vs.kamlesh Chugh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2017. SARANJIT SINGH BHATIA RC.REV. 385/2017 * % + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Caveat No.753/2017 1. KAMLESH CHUGH Versus The counsel for the caveator/respondent has appeared. Through: Mr. Aditya Madan, Adv. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rashmi B. Singh, Adv. ..... Respondent 2. The caveat stands discharged. CM No.30396/2017 (for exemption) 3.4. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. RC.REV. 385/2017 & CM No.30395/2017 (for stay) 5. This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 26th April, 2017 in Ev. No.5182/2016 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC), South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi]. of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner for leave to defend and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioner from private shop No.5 on the ground floor of property No....
New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.master Dhruv Kathuria & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~13 to 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 174/2016 and CM456102016 and 16777/2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Vinod Trisal, Advocate .... Appellant versus MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1 to 3 + MAC.APP. 287/2016 and CM167762017 MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD versus Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1 to 3 + MAC.APP. 6/2017 MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for A-1 to 3 versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS MAC Appeal No.174/16, 2& 6/2017 Page 1 of 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 12.06.2012, Amit Kathuria, a serving officer of Indian Air Force, with his wife ...
Amit Sharma & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~42, 43 & 51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) 2448/2017 + W.P. (CRL.) 2449/2017 + Crl.M.C. 3421/2017 AMIT SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Lokesh Kumar Mishra Advocate with Ms. Arti Baghel, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ashish Negi, Adv. for Ms. Richa Kapoor, in W.P. (CRL.) No.2448/2017 and W.P. (CRL.) No.2449/2017. Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State with SI Jagdeep Malik, P.S. Geeta Colony, Delhi in Crl. M.C. 3421/2017. Respondent No.2 in person along with her mother. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER2908.2017 Crl.M.A. 13994/2017 in W.P. (CRL.) 2448/2017 Crl.M.A. 13996/2017 in W.P. (CRL.) 2449/2017 Crl.M.A. 13997/2017 in Crl. M.C. 3421/2017 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. + W.P. (CRL.) 2448/2017 W.P. (CRL). No.2448/2017, 2449/2017 & Crl.M.C. 3421/2017 Page 1 of 4 Crl.M.C. 3421/2017 + W.P. (CRL.) 2449/2017 + 1. Crl.M.C. 3421/2017 is received on transfer ...
Poonam & Ors. Vs.mohd. Noor Alam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~23 to 25 * % + MAC.APP. 574/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h August, 2017 23 M/S NAVEEN MOTORS LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. Kashyap, Advs. versus SMT. POONAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. for R1 to R7. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Adv. for R9. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R10. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. + MAC.APP. 686/2013 24 POONAM & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. versus MOHD. NOOR ALAM & ORS. Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. Kashyap, Advs. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R3. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 760/2013 25 RAVI RANJAN SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Adv. versus M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R1. Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. MAC.APP.574/2013, 686/2013 & 760/2013 Page 1 of 5 1. Kashyap, Advs. for Naveen Motors. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. CORAM: HON'BLE...
Kusum Products Limited (Kpl) vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 236/2017 & C.M. No.1169/2017 KUSUM PRODUCTS LIMITED (KPL) ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Purti Marwaha Gupta and Mr. C.S. Chauhan, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.R. Jain, Senior Standing Counsel with Mrs. Sapna Jain, Advocates for R-2 and R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER2908.2017 1. The petitioner/company has filed the present petition praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondent No.2/Directorate of Income Tax (Recovery) for grant of relief under Sections 41(1), 45, 72(3) and 115 JB of the Income Tax Act, in compliance with the Scheme sanctioned by the BIFR, vide order dated 24.1.2012.2. Ms. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner states that recently, on 17.8.2017, an order was passed by the High Court in a petition filed by the petitioner herein, registered as WP(C) No.12152/2016, where the relief prayed for was ...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.krishna & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1005/2011 and CM APPL.20665/2011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dilip Kumar, proxy counsel for Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate versus KRISHNA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant insurance company (insurer) was one of the party respondents to the accident claim case (MAC Petition No.143/2010), instituted by the first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants) on 17.07.2010 seeking compensation on account of death of Yogender Singh in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 16.04.2010 at about 7:15 a.m., involving collision between the two vehicles, they being two wheeler scooter bearing registration No.DL-4S-AQ-3663 (the scooter) and Hyundai Accent car bearing registration No.DL-2F- BD-9000 (the car). The deceased was riding on the scooter when the ...
Advertising Standards Council of India vs.reckitt Benckiser India Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~4 & 5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of decision :29. h August, 2017 FAO(OS) 11/2017 and CM No.1427/2017 ADVERTISING STANDARDS COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Ms. Avni Singh and Ms. Gauri Puri, Advs. versus RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PVT LTD .... Respondent Through : Mr. Chander M.Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Rupin Bahl, Mr. Dhruv Nayar and Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Advs. FAO(OS) 38/2017 and CM No.4678/2017 ADVERTISING STANDARDS COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Ms. Avni Singh and Ms. Gauri Puri, Advs. versus RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PVT LTD ... Respondent Through : Mr. Chander M.Lall, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Rupin Bahl, Mr. Dhruv Nayar and Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR FAO(OS)Nos.11/2017 & 38/2017 Page 1 of 14 JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 By way of these two appeals, the appellant assails two orders p...
Dinesh Kumar vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:29. h August, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4858/2017 DINESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vishesh Issar and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advocate for respondent no.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner claims to be a regular squatter and also claims to be carrying out his squatting activities at gali no.4, infront of Mohan Departmental Store (Shop No.2620-2621), Beadon Pura, Main Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The grievance of the petitioner is that the officials of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation are harassing him and interfering in his vending activities.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Li...
Fateh Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) 3227/2015 Date of decision:29. h August, 2017 FATEH SINGH Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Mr.R.R.Mishra, Ms.Shruti Sharma, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Barkha Babbar, Ms.Dipanjali Tyagi, Advs. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) The petitioner, Fateh Singh, in this writ petition filed in March, 2015, has primarily prayed for quashing and setting aside of the order dated 5th November, 2002 by which his service was terminated on the ground of colour blindness. The petitioner has also prayed for reinstatement with back wages and that the period WP(C) 3227/2015 Page 1 from 5th November, 2002 till reinstatement should be counted as period spent on duty for the purpose of retirement benefits.2. The first and apparent question which arises for consideration is whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the groun...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »