Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neena Synghal vs.registrar Co-Operative Societies & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2853/2017 & C.M. No.12490/2017 (Stay) NEENA SYNGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Mittal and Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Uttam Datt and Ms. Riya Gulati, Advocates for R-1/RCS. Mr. R.K. Gupta, Advocate for R-2 & R-3. Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, Advocate for R-4/DDA. REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER2908.2017 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondent No.1/RCS to take appropriate steps for disqualifying the respondent No.3 as a member of the respondent No.2/Society and cancel her membership on the ground that her husband has also been enrolled as a member in some other Society.2. Counter affidavits have been filed by the respondent No.1/RCS and respondent No.4/DDA.3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/RCS states that after the co...
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs.master Dhruv Kathuria & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~13 to 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 174/2016 and CM456102016 and 16777/2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Vinod Trisal, Advocate .... Appellant versus MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1 to 3 + MAC.APP. 287/2016 and CM167762017 MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD versus Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1 to 3 + MAC.APP. 6/2017 MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for A-1 to 3 versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS MAC Appeal No.174/16, 2& 6/2017 Page 1 of 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 12.06.2012, Amit Kathuria, a serving officer of Indian Air Force, with his wife ...
Bharti Chopra vs.medical Council of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~11. * + % W.P.(C.) No.6491/2017 BHARTI CHOPRA Date of Decision:29. 08.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Rai & Mr. Rishi Kumar, Advocates. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate along with Mr. T.S. Singhdev & Ms.Puja Sarkar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 31.03.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in OA No.3860/2014. The petitioner had preferred the said original application being aggrieved by her termination. Her services were terminated by the respondent after issuing her a show-cause notice and calling for her reply on the allegation, that she had misrepresented with regard to her experience, at the time of her recruitment as Telephone Operator-cum-Receptionist in the respondent-MCI. W.P....
Virendra Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
* % + AND + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 23, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: August 29, 2017 CRL.A. 840/2001 JASBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar CRL.A. 398/2002 JAGJIT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus STATE AND + ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar. CRL.A. 399/2002 VIRENDRA SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus STATE ..... Respondent CRL.A.Nos.840/2001, 398/2002 & 399/2002 Page 1 of 18 Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT1 Feeling aggrieved by their conviction and sentence awarded vide judgment dated 19th October, 2001 and order on sentence dated 23rd October, 2001 passed in Sessions...
M/S Naveen Motors Ltd vs.smt. Poonam & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~23 to 25 * % + MAC.APP. 574/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h August, 2017 23 M/S NAVEEN MOTORS LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. Kashyap, Advs. versus SMT. POONAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. for R1 to R7. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Adv. for R9. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R10. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. + MAC.APP. 686/2013 24 POONAM & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. versus MOHD. NOOR ALAM & ORS. Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. Kashyap, Advs. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R3. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 760/2013 25 RAVI RANJAN SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Adv. versus M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R1. Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. MAC.APP.574/2013, 686/2013 & 760/2013 Page 1 of 5 1. Kashyap, Advs. for Naveen Motors. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. CORAM: HON'BLE...
Moolchand Kharaiti Ram Trust & Ors vs.rajani Kothari & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2017. C.R.P. 59/2005 MOOLCHAND KHARAITI RAM TRUST & ORS ....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Bahl, Adv. Versus RAJANI KOTHARI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. N.D. Pancholi & Mr. Amit Srivastav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the order (dated 5th November, 2004 in Suit No.414/2003 of the Court of the Civil Judge, Delhi) allowing the application of the respondents/plaintiffs under Section 92 of CPC and granting leave to the respondents/plaintiffs to institute the suit under Section 92 of CPC.2. 3. The petition was entertained and notice thereof ordered to be issued. During the pendency of this petition, the suit from which this petition arises, was dismissed in default of appearance of the respondents/plaintiffs and this petition was kept pending awaiting the...
Union of India and Anr. Vs.avinash Chandra Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~11. * + % WP(C) 6086/2017 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 08.2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate versus AVINASH CHANDRA SINGH AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajesh Luthra with Mr. Jatin Parashar, Advocates for caveator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 21.02.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in three Original Applications, including, O.A. No.263/2017, preferred by the respondents. By the said common order, the Tribunal has allowed the Original Applications preferred by the applicants. The petitioner Union of India, had also filed WP(C) No.4829/2017 titled, Union of India & Ors. Vs. Sumit Kumar to assail the same common order passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No.215/2017. This Court has, vide order dated 10.08.2017, W.P.(C) 6086/2017 Page 1 o...
Master Dhruv Kathuria & Ors vs.the New India Assurance Co Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~13 to 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 174/2016 and CM456102016 and 16777/2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. Vinod Trisal, Advocate .... Appellant versus MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1 to 3 + MAC.APP. 287/2016 and CM167762017 MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD versus Through: Mr. Salil Paul, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for R-1 to 3 + MAC.APP. 6/2017 MASTER DHRUV KATHURIA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. B.R. Sachdeva and Mr. Shekhar Aggarwal, Advocates for A-1 to 3 versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS MAC Appeal No.174/16, 2& 6/2017 Page 1 of 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On 12.06.2012, Amit Kathuria, a serving officer of Indian Air Force, with his wife ...
Rakesh Kumar vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:29. h August, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4471/2017 RAKESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Vishesh Issar and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR Through : Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Advocate for respondent no.1. ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner claims to be regular squatter and also claims to be carrying out his squatting activities in front of Chief Readymade Shop (Madan Store), between Gali no.7 and 8, Main Ajmal Khan Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The grievance of the petitioner is that the officials of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation are harassing him and interfering in his vending activities.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and R...
Ravi Ranjan Sharma vs.m/s. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~23 to 25 * % + MAC.APP. 574/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h August, 2017 23 M/S NAVEEN MOTORS LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. Kashyap, Advs. versus SMT. POONAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. for R1 to R7. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Adv. for R9. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R10. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. + MAC.APP. 686/2013 24 POONAM & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. versus MOHD. NOOR ALAM & ORS. Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. Kashyap, Advs. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R3. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 760/2013 25 RAVI RANJAN SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Adv. versus M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for R1. Mr. Vijay Kumar and Mr. K.S. MAC.APP.574/2013, 686/2013 & 760/2013 Page 1 of 5 1. Kashyap, Advs. for Naveen Motors. SI Rahul, P.S. Kalkaji. CORAM: HON'BLE...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »