Skip to content

Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 29 2017

United India Insurance Co Ltd vs.jasvinder Kaur & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 577/2014 and CM APPL.10574/2014 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Priyadarsi Acharya, Advocate versus JASVINDER KAUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. P.K. Saxena, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) On 24.04.2011 Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, a bachelor, 20 years old, died in a motor vehicular accident that occurred due to negligent driving of water tanker bearing registration No.DL-1GA-9830, admittedly insured with the appellant insurance company (insurer) against third party risk for the period in question. Her parents (first and second respondents), collectively, the claimants, brought accident claim case (MACP No.360/2011) instituted on 01.09.2011 seeking compensation.2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 05.04.2014, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.14,02,812/-, calculating it thus:-"MAC Appeal...


Aug 29 2017

Ashok Kumar Oberoi vs.manjeet Singh (Deceased) Thr His Lrs & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

$~8 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 167/2017 & CM Nos.20592-93/2017 % Date of decision :29. h August, 2017 ASHOK KUMAR OBEROI Through : Mr. P.S. Singh, Adv. ..... Appellant versus MANJEET SINGH (DECEASED) THR HIS LRS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Vinny Shangloo, Adv. for R-2 along with Mr. Harish Katyal. Mr. H.D. Talwani, Adv. for Mr. M.S. Saluja, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The appellant before us assails the order dated 20th December, 2016 passed by the Joint Registrar (Judicial) in CS(OS)No.2602/2012 Ashok Kumar Oberai vs. Manjeet Singh & Ors. whereby the evidence of the appellant/plaintiff has been closed.2. The appellant also assails the order dated 13th February, 2017 FAO(OS) 167/2017 Page 1 of 9 passed by the ld. Single Judge whereby the ld. Single Judge has noted the fact that the appellant/plaintiff evidence was closed and that he has no...


Aug 29 2017

Hemant Kumar vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:29. h August, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4854/2017 HEMANT KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vishesh Issar and Mr. Varun versus Sharma, Advocates NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR Through Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1. ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner claims to be a regular squatter and also claims to be carrying out his squatting activities at Main Ajmal Khan Road, gali no.7, infront of Gyan Sons, The Selection shop bearing No.2514, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The grievance of the petitioner is that the officials of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation are harassing him and interfering in his vending activities.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood an...


Aug 29 2017

Twenty First Century Media Private Limited vs.new India Assurance Comp ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 08.2017 LPA3542016 TWENTY FIRST CENTURY MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meghna Mishra, Mr. Rohan Sharma, Mr. Dheeraj P. Deo and Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddiqui, Advocates versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD (NIA) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Facts 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the decision of the learned Single Judge dated 30.03.2016, by which its writ petition was dismissed. Its claim in the writ petition was that the refusal to cover an event, which had been insured, is arbitrary and unreasonable.2. The appellant, a private company is engaged in event management business. On 13.09.2010, a letter was issued to one M/s. Prerana International by the Goa Cricket Association in pursuance of a tender floated LPA No.354/2016 Page 1 of 21 by i...


Aug 29 2017

Karma Gyaltsen Neyratsang vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2017 + W.P.(C) 6074/2014 & CM No.14780/2014 KARMA GYALTSEN NEYRATSANG Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr D. K. Thakur. : Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the Show Cause Notices dated 29.06.2012 and 12.09.2012; order dated 13.07.2012 passed by the Regional Passport Officer (hereafter as RPO) for revocation of the petitioner's passport; and order dated 19.08.2014 passed by respondent no.3, Chief Passport Officer (hereafter as CPO), under Section 11 of the Passports Act, 1967 upholding the RPO's order dated 13.07.2012.2. The passport facilities were withdrawn from the petitioner, principally on the ground that the petitioners parents were of Tibetan origin and accordi...


Aug 29 2017

New India Assurance co.ltd. Vs.monika & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

$~4 & 5 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 18/2016 and CM APPL.717/2016 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate with Mr. Maheen Pradhan, Advocate Versus MONIKA & ORS + MAC.APP. 245/2016 and CM APPL.10266/2016 Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS MONIKA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus PAPPU RAM & ANR (NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate with Mr. Maheen Pradhan, Advocate for R-2. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, aged over 36 years (born on 26.06.1973), died due to injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on the intervening night of 09-10.08.2009 in the area of Sunderpur bus stand turning, Jind Road, Rohtak Sadar due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.RJ-02G-5518 by Pappu Ram (the driver), son of Dalu R...


Aug 29 2017

Up State Road Transport Corp. Vs.keshar & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.478/2016 UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. versus KESHAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R-1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Nadeem Ansari suffered death in an accident due to negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.UP81F7084on 20.03.2014, the vehicle admittedly owned by the appellant. On accident claim case (MAC petition 116/2014) instituted by first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants) on 05.05.2014, the tribunal awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.16,02,158/- (Rupees Sixteen Lac Two Thousand One Hundred Fifty Eight) directing the appellant to pay with interest @ 12 % per annum.2. The appeal is pressed at the hearing only to contend that the award under the non-pecuniary heads of damages and the rate of interest levied are excessive. MAC Appeal No.478/2016 Page ...


Aug 29 2017

Lal Chand vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:29. h August, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4831/2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vishesh Issar and Mr. Varun LAL CHAND Sharma, Advocates NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR versus Through Mr. Sanjeev Garg, Advocate for respondent no.1. ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner claims to be regular squatter and also claims to be carrying out his squatting activities at gali no.27near COBB, New Diamond Mall, Ajmal Khan Road, Beadanpura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The grievance of the petitioner is that the officials of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation are harassing him and interfering in his vending activities.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulations of Street Vending) A...


Aug 29 2017

Amit Kumar vs.the Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

$~21. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.3694/2017 ,Date of decision:29. h August, 2017 AMIT KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Md. Azam Ansari, Advocate. versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Amit Kumar, the writ petitioner, has prayed for direction that he be admitted to the Army Wing of National Defence Academy.2. The petitioner had appeared in the written examination for the National Defence Academy, Course Serial No.136, conducted by the Union Public Service Commission.3. The petitioner had given Army as his first choice as the said examination was a combined examination for 208 vacancies in the Army, 42 vacancies in the Navy and 70 vacancies in the Air Force.4. As per merit list, published on 9th June, 2016, the petitioner had secured merit position 359, out of total of 423 candidates, who wer...


Aug 29 2017

Jasbir Singh vs.the State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-29-2017

* % + AND + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 23, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: August 29, 2017 CRL.A. 840/2001 JASBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar CRL.A. 398/2002 JAGJIT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus STATE AND + ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar. CRL.A. 399/2002 VIRENDRA SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anurag Abhishek, Advocate Versus STATE ..... Respondent CRL.A.Nos.840/2001, 398/2002 & 399/2002 Page 1 of 18 Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Sanjay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT1 Feeling aggrieved by their conviction and sentence awarded vide judgment dated 19th October, 2001 and order on sentence dated 23rd October, 2001 passed in Sessions...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial