Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Monika & Ors vs.pappu Ram & Anr (New India Assurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~4 & 5 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 18/2016 and CM APPL.717/2016 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate with Mr. Maheen Pradhan, Advocate Versus MONIKA & ORS + MAC.APP. 245/2016 and CM APPL.10266/2016 Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS MONIKA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus PAPPU RAM & ANR (NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate with Mr. Maheen Pradhan, Advocate for R-2. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, aged over 36 years (born on 26.06.1973), died due to injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on the intervening night of 09-10.08.2009 in the area of Sunderpur bus stand turning, Jind Road, Rohtak Sadar due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.RJ-02G-5518 by Pappu Ram (the driver), son of Dalu R...
Standard Chartered Bank vs.sbi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~R-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order:29. h August 2017. + RFA702009 STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Mr. Ateev Mathur, Ms. Jagriti Ahuja, Advocates versus SBI & ANR. Through: Ms. S.L. Gupta, Advocate for SBI ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER2908.2017 % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL) Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2008, passed the appellant has 1. by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, preferred this present appeal. The facts as enumerating from the record are that the 2. plaintiff/respondent had filed a suit for recovery of Rs.10,63,180/- against the defendant/appellant bank. The plaintiff/respondent bank had a current bank account of National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) and the NTPC during the course of reconciliation of their said current bank account, mentioned four forged cheques, namely- No.566603 for Rs.3,08,000/-, No.566623 for Rs.2,80,000/- and No.566610 for Rs...
Shiv Giri vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:29. h August, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4844/2017 SHIV GIRI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vishesh Issar and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR Through Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1. ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner claims to be a regular squatter and also claims to be carrying out his squatting activities at 13/8, W.E.A., Padam Singh Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The grievance of the petitioner is that the officials of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation are harassing him and interfering in his vending activities.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulations of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (hereinafter the Ac...
Union of India & Ors. Vs.haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) No.160/2017 Date of decision:29. h August, 2017. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr. Jagjit Singh, Standing Counsel. versus HARYANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This intra court appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Court, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court Act, 2015 read with Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 impugns the judgment dated 25th April, 2017 passed by the Commercial Bench of the High Court.2. The appellant had filed objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act, for short) impugning the FAO(OS)(COMM) No.160/2017 Page 1 of 12 arbitral award dated 27th July, 2016 passed by Mr. M.C. Srivastava, Member Traffic (Retired), Railway Board.3. Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd, a S...
Seo Pal vs.quality Rice Exports Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 410/2016 SEO PAL Through: Mr. Sanjay Relan with ..... Plaintiff versus Mr. Sushant Dahiya, Advocates. QUALITY RICE EXPORTS PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Aslam with Mr. Balbir Singh, Advocates. Date of Decision:29. h August, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. No.3621/2017 1. Present application has been filed under Order XIII-A read with Section 151 CPC.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that the plaintiff is running a sole proprietorship firm under the name and style of Banarsi Dass & Sons as a grain merchant and commission agent from its office at 2376, Mandi Extension, Narela, Delhi-110040. CS (COMM) 410 /2016 Page 1 of 6 3. The defendant is a registered company having its registered office at Nial Bye-Pass Road, Patran, Distt. Patiala, Punjab.4. On 5th April, 2014, the plaintiff/applicant filed the present suit for recovery of money due against the supplies of paddy made betw...
Teekays Interiors Pvt Ltd vs.fiitjee Foundation for Education Research ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:29. 08.2017 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 67/2017 & I.A.Nos.9769-71/2017 TEEKAYS INTERIORS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.D.K.Sharma & Mr.Anuj Saini, versus Advocates FIITJEE FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & TRAINING Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) I.A.No.9770-9771/2017(exemptions) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 67/2017 & I.A.No.9769/2017(stay) 1. This petition is filed under Section 14(2) and 15 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking to set aside the appointment of the sole arbitrator and to constitute an arbitral tribunal.2. Some of the relevant facts are that first agreement was entered into between the parties for carrying out civil and interior works by petitioner at Vittalwadi Centre, Hyderabad 08.05.2010. The second agreement is said to have been entered into between the parti...
Inderpal & Ors. Vs.shravan & Ors. (M/S Oriental Insurance Co Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h August, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.473/2016 INDERPAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. versus SHRAVAN & ORS. (M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO PVT. LTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar Dhingra, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Baljeet Singh, 28 years old, died in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 26.04.2010, due to negligent driving of tempo bearing registration no.DL1E1378by the first respondent, the said vehicle being owned by the second respondent and insured against third party risk for the period in question with the third respondent. His parents, sister and wife Bharti (collectively, the claimants) instituted accident claim case (MACT No.113/13/2010) on 08.07.2010 seeking compensation.2. During inquiry, Bharti, the widow of the deceased died on 19.07.2012. As a result, her name stood dropped out from the array of the petitioners leaving the appel...
G Raju vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:29. h August, 2017 + W.P.(C) 4546/2017 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Vishesh Issar and Mr. Varun G RAJU Sharma, Advocates NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR versus Through Mr. Prabhat Kumar and Mr. Vaibhav ....... RESPONDENTS Mishra, Advocates for respondent no.1. Ms. Neelam Singh, Advocate for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner claims to be a regular squatter and also claims to be carrying out his squatting activities at 13/9, W.E.A., Padam Singh Road, near J & K Emporium, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The grievance of the petitioner is that the officials of the North Delhi Municipal Corporation are harassing him and interfering in his vending activities.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner from time to time has been agitating his rights and now in view of Section 3(3) of the Street Vendors (Protection of ...
Usha International Limited & Anr. Vs.suman Industries Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~R-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order:29. h August 2017. + RFA582007 USHA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & ANR. Through: Ms. Divya Bhalla, Mr. Munindra Dwivedi, Mr. Bhavitt K. Rastogi, Advocates ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS versus SUMAN INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS. None. Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER2908.2017 % P.S. TEJI, J.(ORAL) 1. Aggrieved by the order and judgment dated 01.09.2006, the appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 of CPC, whereby the suit of the appellant has been partially decreed against the respondents and the respondents have been restrained from using the trade mark USHA DELUXE but rest of the claims of the appellants with regard to the copyright and damages have not been granted.2. In brief, facts of the case are that the appellant had filed a suit before the trial court for seeking injunction, passing off and rendition of accounts and damages etc, in relation to trade mark. ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-16 vs.jagat Talkies Distributors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.916/2015 $~ * 37-42 + PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-16 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel. versus JAGAT TALKIES DISTRIBUTORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Y.K. Kapur with Mr. Bhushan Kapur, Advocates. With ITA No.990/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-16 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel. versus JAGAT TALKIES DISTRIBUTORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Y.K. Kapur with Mr. Bhushan Kapur, Advocates. With ITA No.1000/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-16 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel. versus + + ITA No.916/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 14 + + + JAGAT TALKIES DISTRIBUTORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Y.K. Kapur with Mr. Bhushan Kapur, Advocates. With ITA No.1001/2015 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-16 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior standing counsel. versus JAGAT TALKIES DISTRIBUTORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Y...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »