Delhi Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.prakashi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~R-146 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h August, 2017 + MAC APPEAL6242009 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate versus PRAKASHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Popli, Adv. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By the impugned judgment dated 13.10.2009, while awarding compensation in favour of the first and second respondents (collectively, the claimants), the liability to pay was fastened on the appellant / insurance company (insurer) and its plea about breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy having been accepted on the basis of the finding that the driver of the offending vehicle (insured vehicle) did not hold a valid or effective driving licence, recovery rights were granted in its favour.2. By the appeal at hand, the insurance company presses for total exoneration questioning the direction to pay in the first instance. MAC Appeal No.624/2009 Page 1 of 2 ...
Deepak Srivastav vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:19. h May, 2017 Judgment delivered on 30 August, 2017 CRL.A. 36/2004 POONAM SRIVASTAV ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Lalit Sankhla, Mr.Pawan Sankhla, Mr.Padam Sankhla, Mr.Raj Kamal and Ms.Pallavi Malhotra, Advs. Versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Mr.Pawan K. Bahl, Adv. for the complainant. CRL.A. 68/2004 JITENDER SRIVASTAV & ORS ..... Appellants Through : Mr.K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Lalit Sankhla, Mr.Pawan Sankhla, Mr.Padam Sankhla, Mr.Raj Kamal and Ms.Pallavi Malhotra, Advs. Versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Mr.Pawan K. Bahl, Adv. for the complainant. Crl.A. 36/2004, 68/2004 & 85/2004 Page 1 of 46 + CRL.A. 85/2004 DEEPAK SRIVASTAV ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Lalit Sankhla, Mr.Pawan Sankhla, Mr.Padam Sankhla, Mr.Raj Kamal and Ms.Pallavi Malhotra, Advs. Versus STATE OF DELHI .......
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.ranee Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 782/2017 & CM No.31454/2017 (stay) RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Ms. Prerna Mehta, Adv. versus Through: None. RANEE DEVI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) ........ RESPONDENTS 1. On the claim petition (new MACT no.477063/2016) of the first to seventh respondents (collectively, the claimants), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by judgment dated 07.06.2017, which is impugned herein, while awarding compensation on account of the death of Vikash Kushvaha @ Vikas due to negligent driving of a truck bearing registration no.HR-55T-8624 (old no.BR-51A-1198) admittedly insured with the appellant / insurance company (insurer), it has been burdened with the liability to pay the same with interest at the rate of 9% p.a.2. The appeal seeking to assail the aforesaid judgment of the tribunal is based only on the ground that the rate of interest levi...
Lakha Singh & Ors vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2275/2017 LAKHA SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivom Garg along with petitioners in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Srilina Roy, Advocate for Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for the State with Inspector Mahinder Lal, P.S. Govindpuri, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % Crl.M.A. 12854/2017 (exemption) ORDER3008.2017 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2275/2017 1.2. Status report has been filed. Respondent No.2 appears in person. She is duly identified by the IO SI Dalbir Singh. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Articleof the Constitution of India read with 3. W.P. (Crl.)2275/2017 Page 1 of 3 4.5. 6. for quashing of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) the FIR bearing No.941/2014, registered on 09.09.2014 with Police St...
Union of India & Anr vs.dharmabir Malik & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.6519/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Date of Decision:30. h August, 2017. ....... Petitioners Through: Mr.R.V. Sinha, Adv. & Mr.Ashok Singh, Adv. Versus DHARMABIR MALIK & ANR. Through: Nemo. ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI , J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner-Union of India has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 21st April, 2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal) in OA No.276/2016 & OA No.277/2016. The Tribunal has allowed the said original applications by the common order.2. The present petition is directed against the order passed in OA No.276/2016. The respondent-applicant, who was serving as the WP(C) No.6519/2017 Page 1 of 8 Chief Depot Material Superintendent (CDMS) in the Northern Railway (promoted as CDMS w.e.f. 30th November, 2007), had filed the aforesaid Original...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.sugas & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:30. h August, 2017 + MAC.APP. 1013/2015 and CM APPL.32167/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate versus SUGAS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pankaj Kumari proxy counsel for Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for R-1 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) On 27.03.2013 at about 1:15 p.m., Imran, a bachelor, 18 years old, met with a motor vehicular accident involving negligent driving of motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-5SS-8779, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company (insurer) for the period in question, and died in the consequence. His mother and siblings, they being first to fifth respondents (collectively, the claimants), brought before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the tribunal) accident claim case (MACT No.102/2013) on 11.04.2013 seeking compensation. The tribunal, by judgment dated 13.10.2015, awarde...
Ajay Sethi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~14 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 788/2017 AJAY SETHI Date of Judgment:30. h August, 2017 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sumeet Verma and Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocates STATE versus Through : Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment dated 26.08.2016 passed in Sessions Case no.40/2014 FIR no.08/2009 P.S. Vasant Kunj, by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 413 of the Indian Penal Code. Challenge is also laid to the order on sentence dated 01.10.2016 by which appellant Ajay Sethi has been sentenced to the period already undergone by him which is 07 years 05 months and 09 days for the offence under Section 413 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The case of the prosecution, as noticed by the learned Trial Court, is as under: 1. DD No.8A...
Atul Rastogi & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~40 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2464/2017 ATUL RASTOGI & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saroj Kumar Jha, Advocate with Ms. Meenu Jha, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Jamal Akhtar Advocate along with SI Raj Kumar, P.S. Kapasheda, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER3008.2017 % Crl.M.A. 14115/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2464/2017 1. Notice. Learned APP, who appears on an advance copy having been served, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She is present in court and accepts notice. She is duly identified by IO SI Raj Kumar. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 2.3. W.P. (Crl.) 2464/2017 Page 1 of 3 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...
State vs.upender & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
$~1, 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:30. h August, 2017 CRL.L.P. 275/2014 STATE Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the ........ Petitioner State with Inspr. Arvind Sharma, P.S. R. K. Puram versus UPENDER & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Rajender Singh, Advocate for R- 1, 5 and 8. Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nikilesh R. , Mr. Navdeep Vain, Ms. Maisha, Mr. Archana Gupta and Ms. Vailashai Tanwar, Advocate for R-4 Mr. Mohd. Talha, Advocate for R-7 + CRL.L.P. 121/2016 RAMPHAL Through Mr. P. K. Dey, Ms. Shreyasi, ........ Petitioner versus Chakrborty and Ms. Shilpi Dey, Advocates STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with Inspr. Arvind Sharma, P.S. R. K. Puram Mr. Mohd. Talha, Advocate for R-8 Mr. Shakeel Sarwar Wavi, Advocate for R-4/Davinder Sharma Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nikilesh R. , Mr. Navdeep Vain, Ms. Maisha, Mr. Archana Gupta and Crl. L.P.275/2014 etc. P...
Greenfield Public School vs.edu Smart Services Private Limited & Anoth ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 08.2017 ARB.P. 396/2017 GREENFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOL versus EDU SMART SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr Siddharth Khattar : Mr R.Narayanan, Mr Prashant Prakash and Mr Ravee J.Kumar, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2908.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) ARB.P.396/2017 & IA No.6948/2017(stay) 1. The petitioner, by this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), seeks appointment of an independent Sole Arbitrator.2. A Tripartite Agreement was entered into between the petitioner on the one side and the respondents, on the other, for installation and implementation of Smart Class at the premises of the petitioner for a period of five years. ARB. PET. 396/2017 Page 1 of 3 3. The Arbitration Clause agree...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »