Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Singh Dogra vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~26 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) 5326/2015 VIJAY SINGH DOGRA Through: Dr.Surender Singh Hooda, Adv. Date of decision :28. h July, 2017 ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. Dr.Rakesh Gosain, Adv. for Respondent No.6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) The petitioner-Vijay Singh Dogra seeks and prays for seniority in the cadre of Law Officer Grade-I/ Commandant in the BSF-Law service above S.S. Rana, the 6th respondent. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing of orders dated 29,03.2012, 20.09.2012, 09.12.2013, 18.02.2015 and 01.05.2015 rejecting his representations on seniority.2. The 6th respondent was appointed as Law Officer, Grade- II on deputation on 03.11.2003 in the BSF-Law Cadre. The WP (C) 5326/2015 Page1 of 9 selection was made by Departmental Screening Committee, in which the petitioner and others had participated but...
Suman Kumari vs.m/s Bhagini Nivedita College and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :24. h July, 2017 Date of decision :28. h July, 2017 W.P.(C) 6195/2017 SUMAN KUMARI Through Mr. R.S.Jena, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner M/S BHAGINI NIVEDITA COLLEGE AND ANR........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA Through Nemo. ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 By the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned award dated 14.12.2016 of the Presiding Officer Labour Court-XIX, Karkardooma,Delhi in LIR No.2whereby the reference No.F.24 (122)/13/SWD/Lab./5004-5007 dated 29.05.2013 as received from the Dy.Labour Commissioner, Government of NCT of Delhi to the effect: Whether services of Sh.(sic) Suman Kumari W/o Sh. Raju have been illegally and/or unjustifiably terminated by the management, and if yes, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect?. was answered to the effect that the worklady arrayed as the petitioner herein was not entitled to any relief and her claim...
Taposh Chatterjee vs.madhulika Chatterjee
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 07.2017 CS(OS) 2970/2012 ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendant TAPOSH CHATTERJEE versus MADHULIKA CHATTERJEE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff For the Defendant :, Ms. Rashi Bansal, Advocate with plaintiff in person. : Mr. Manoj Chatterjee with Ms. K. Iyer, Advocates with defendant in person CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2807.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CS(OS) 233/2011 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for declaration, partition, permanent injunction and rendition of accounts.2. 3. The parties were referred to mediation. The parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation and, accordingly, interim settlement agreements dated 03.12.2014, 16.01.2015, 19.10.2016, 11.01.2017 and 20.03.2017 were executed. CS(OS)2970/2012 Page 1 of 3 4. In furtherance to the interim settlement agreements, referred to above, final settlement agreement dated 12.05.2017...
Munesh Kumari vs.imran & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P.424/2017 % MUNESH KUMARI Date of Decision:28. 07.2017 Through Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra, Adv. ........ Petitioner IMRAN & ANR versus Through ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 12084/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A. 12085/2017 (delay of 9 days in filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 9 days in filing the leave petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Crl.L.P.424/2017 1. The petitioner/complainant claims to have advanced a loan of Rs.2 lakh to the respondent on 12.01.2014 for a period of one year as the respondent was in need of money for running his business of sale of mobile sets and repairs. Crl.L.P.424/2017 Page 1 of 4 2. According to the petitioner/complainant, the loan was advanced after arranging the same from various other sources. The details of those sou...
Iffco Tokio General Insurnace Co Ltd vs.manju & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h July, 2017 + MAC.APP. 799/2016 and CM368292016 and 8381/2017 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURNACE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Brijesh Bagga, Advocate versus MANJU & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amandeep Kaur and Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocates for R-1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Shashi Bhushan died as a result of the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 01.04.2012 involving rash driving of a motor vehicle described as Toyota Fortuner bearing registration no.HFR-26-BP-6829 which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company. His legal heirs (first to fourth respondents) instituted accident claim case (MACT26112) in the wake of a detailed accident report (DAR) submitted by the police pursuant to the investigation into corresponding criminal case. In the said proceedings besides the driver and owner of the offending vehicl...
Meenu Wadhera & Anr vs.reliance General Ins Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 to 16 * % + MAC.APP. 259/2015 & CM No.4546/2015, 2444-2445/2016 Date of Decision:28. h July, 2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant versus MEENU WADHERA & ORS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R1 and R2. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 278/2015 & CM No.5035/2015 & 2014/2016 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant versus KRISHNA AHUJA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R1 to R4. + MAC.APP. 128/2016 MEENU WADHERA & ANR Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. ..... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INS CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP.259/2015, 278/2015, 128/2016 & 889/2016 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 889/2016 KRISHNA AHUJA & ORS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. ..... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R...
Jagpal Singh & Anr. Vs.state (Govt Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : July 28th, 2017 Crl. A. No.214/2002 JAGPAL SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.R.N. Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Amitej Kumar Nagar, Ms.Arushi Tangri, Ms.Vasudha Bajaj, Mr.R.P. Singh, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI JUDGMENT P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants-Jagpal Singh and Rajinder Kumar @ Titu being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 21.02.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi convicting the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 342/3of Indian Penal Code referred to as I.P.C.) and order on sentence dated (hereinafter 25.02.2002, whereby the appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence under Section 3of IPC and to undergo rigorous impris...
Chaman Lal Nayyar vs.daya Chand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h July, 2017 RC.REV. No.301/2016, CMNo.20843/2016, CM No.20581/2017 and CM.No.26648/2017 (u/S151CPC). CHAMAN LAL NAYYAR ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal, Mr. Amit Prakash Shahi and Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Advs. Versus Through: Mr. Ramkishan Saini, Adv. ...Respondent DAYA CHAND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order (dated 1st February, 2016 in E No.1of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi) of eviction, after full trial, of the petitioner/tenant from shop situated on the ground floor of property bearing Private No.1, forming part of the property bearing Municipal No.1865-A, Ram Lal Asha Ram Market, Opposite Dharam Bhawan, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi, in a petition for eviction filed by the respondent/landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act....
Sanjay Kumar vs.the Union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :25. h July, 2017 Date of decision :28. h July, 2017 W.P.(C) 6293/2017 & CM APPL. 26075/2017 SANJAY KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Girdhari Singh, Adv. versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Sahaj Garg, Adv. for R1/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.CM APPL. 26075/2017 This is an application filed on behalf of the petitioner / applicant Sh. Sanjay Kumar seeking exemption from filing certified copies of the orders and dim annexures. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 6293/2017 1. The petitioner has assailed the impugned Award dated W.P.(C) 6293/2017 Page 1 of 10 04.01.2017 of the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.II, Karkardooma Court Complex, Delhi 110032 in I.D. No.1/12 whereby the reference of the Central Government of the Ministry of Labour sent L...
Pawan Kumar vs.delhi Power Company Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % PAWAN KUMAR RSA No.121/2016 28th July, 2017 Through: Mr. V.K. Goel, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus DELHI POWER COMPANY LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Ms. Shrey Chathly, proxy Advocate for R-3 and 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 31.8.2013 and the first appellate court dated 27.1.2016; by which the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking his appointment to the post of Senior/Station Attendant, Grade-II, has been dismissed. Appointment as per the plaint was sought with the RSA No.121/2016 Page 1 of 8 erstwhile Delhi Vidut Board (DVB) and whose successor entity after unbundling of DVB is the respon...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »