Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Virinder Aggarwal vs.department of Empowerment of Persons With Disabil ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3478/2017 VIRINDER AGGARWAL Through: Mr Amann Preet Singh Rahi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus DEPARTMENT OF EMPOWERMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr Kamal Kant Jha, Senior Panel Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2807.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:-"a) Issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding upon the Respondent to consider the application of the daughter of the... Petitioner for scholarship as per the advertisement issued in the newspaper (Annexure herein) since she is in the category of more than 40% disability. The petitioners daughter, Ms Geetika Aggarwal, was born on 2. 19.08.1985 with a congenital defect as she had only one kidney. The petitioner states that Geetika excelled in academics and completed her schooling with 82% marks in 10th and 70% in class 12t...
Citicorp International Limited vs.shiv-vani Oil & Gas Exploration Serv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:18. h July, 2017 Pronounced on:28. h July, 2017 + CO.PET. 446/2013 CITICORP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus SHIV-VANI OIL & GAS EXPLORATION SERVICES LTD ..... Respondent Presence : Mr.Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ashish Mukhi, Adv. for petitioner in Item No.1 Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Neeraj Yadav, Adv. for applicant in CA Nos.1053 & 1055 of 2017 Mr.Sahil, Adv. for Edelwiss ARC Ltd. Mr.Sarat Chandra, Adv. for petitioner in item No.3 and 39 Mr.Atul Sharma, Mr.Nitesh Jain and Mr.Shubham Mahajan, Advs. for SBI Capital Ms.Padma Priya, Adv. for petitioner in item No.8 Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. for R-2 to 9 in item No.39 Mr.Padam Singhal, Mr.Prem Singhal & Mr.E.S.Rao in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. The petitioner company is engaged in the business of providing corporate trustee services. The respondent company was incorporated to deal in instrumentation, handling equipmen...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.krishna Ahuja & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 to 16 * % + MAC.APP. 259/2015 & CM No.4546/2015, 2444-2445/2016 Date of Decision:28. h July, 2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant versus MEENU WADHERA & ORS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R1 and R2. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 278/2015 & CM No.5035/2015 & 2014/2016 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant versus KRISHNA AHUJA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R1 to R4. + MAC.APP. 128/2016 MEENU WADHERA & ANR Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. ..... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INS CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP.259/2015, 278/2015, 128/2016 & 889/2016 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 889/2016 KRISHNA AHUJA & ORS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. ..... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R...
Mehtab Singh & Anr. Vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.Appeal No.884/2001 Date of Decision: July 28th, 2017 SAVITA ..... Appellants Through Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Vaishali Soni, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI .. Respondent Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. + Crl.Appeal No.10/2002 MEHTAB SINGH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Vaishali Soni, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI .. Respondent Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. By this common order, I shall dispose of the two appeals one filed by the mother-in-law of the deceased being Criminal Appeal No.884/2001 and the other being Criminal Crl.Appeal Nos.8& Page1 of 16 Appeal No.10/2002, filed by the father-in-law and husband of the deceased. The father-in-law has died during the pendency of the appeals.2. Both the abovementioned appeals have been filed against the judgment dated 30.10.2001 whereby the appellants were found guilty and convicted for offences punisha...
Holy Health & Education Society (Regd.) vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.126/2007 + % HOLY HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY (REGD.) 28th July, 2017 Through: Mr. ..... Appellant Vikram Nandrajog, Advocate with Mr. Sheetesh Khanna, Advocate. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the First Appellate Court dated 31.1.2007 accepting the first appeal filed by the present respondent by setting aside the judgment of the Trial Court dated 11.3.2005. The trial court by its judgment had decreed the suit of the appellant/plaintiff and ordered that the entitlement of the RSA No.126/2007 Page 1 of 12 respondent/defendant would be to claim price of land at Rs.9.50 lacs per acre and not at Rs.28.50 lacs per acre in terms ...
Pawan Kumar vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1424/2012 PAWAN KUMAR Date of Judgment:28. h July, 2017 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.U.M.Tripathi versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed under Sections 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) against the judgment dated 07.09.2012 by which the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the order of sentence dated 25.09.2012 whereby the appellant has been sentenced under Section 302 IPC to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of which to undergo further simple imprisonment for six months; and under Section 201 IPC to rigorous imprisonment for five years and also fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of which to further undergo simple imprisonment fo...
Commissioner of Central Excise vs.m/s Modern Industrial Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~S-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:28. 07.2017 + CM APPL.39577-39579/2016 IN CEAC32006 COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sameer Jain, Standing Counsel for CBEC with Mr. Mark Wright, Advocate. versus M/S MODERN INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Krishna Kumar R.S., Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Abhishek Baghel, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The applicant seeks impleadment in an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act which was disposed of by this Court on 02.02.2015.2. The appeal (CEAC32006) was preferred by the Revenue, i.e., the Central Excise Department aggrieved by an order of the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 18.07.2005. This Court had while entertaining the appeal formulated the following questions of law: - CEAC32006 Page 1 of 6 3. 1. Whether the Com...
The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.ram Chander Baitha & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~5 & 6 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h July, 2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. + MAC.APP. 402/2015 versus RAM CHANDER BAITHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.D. Wadhwa, Adv. for Claimants. Mr. R.A. Iyer, Adv. for Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for GNCTD. + MAC.APP. 581/2017 RAM CHANDER BAITHA & ANR Through: Mr. S.D. Wadhwa, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ATUL KUMAR & ORS (THE NEW INDIA ASS. CO LTD) Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Insurance company. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) On 11.11.2006 Nandan, son of the appellants in MAC1 APP.581/2017, they being the first and second respondents in MAC APP.402/2015 (hereinafter referred to as the claimant) was driving a MACA4022015 etc. Page 1 of 6 motorcycle bearing registration No.DL-3SAL-7049, going from Govindpuri to Kalkaji temple with one rider on the pillion. The motorcycle struck against the garbage lo...
Const Karan Singh vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10548/2016 Date of Decision:28. h July, 2017 CONST KARAN SINGH Through: Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC, with UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA Mr. Shiv Sanyam, Ms. Seerat Singh, Advocates for R-1 to 4 SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner Constable Karan Singh in this Writ Petition challenges denial of remustering as Constable (Driver) on the ground that he was over aged, and therefore, ineligible.2. The petitioner had joined the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF for short) as Constable (Trade) on 10.05.2011 and was posted as a Cook.3. By signal dated 16.02.2015 and 22.02.2015, the petitioner was permitted to remuster as Constable (Driver) and join the Driving and W.P. (C) 10548/2016 Page 1 of 9 Mechanic Course (D & M Course) Sr. No.34 commencing from 23.02.2015.4. The pay scales of C...
Mohd Irfan (Senior Citizen). Vs.mohd. Iqbal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h July, 2017 CM(M) 1354/2016 MOHD IRFAN (SENIOR CITIZEN). ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui, Mr. Rakesh Bhugra & Mr. M. Tabish Zia, Advs. Versus MOHD. IQBAL & ORS. Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM Nos.47264-65/2016 (for exemptions) 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. CM(M) 1354/2016 3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 18th October, 2016 in Civil Suit No.117/2016 (Old Civil Suit No.618/2014) of the Court of Civil Judge-02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. of dismissal of the application of the petitioner / plaintiff under Section 151 CPC.4. Though this petition came up before this Court first on 21st December, 2016 but has been adjourned from time to time without notice thereof having been issued.5. The counsel for the petitioner / plaintiff has bee...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »