Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Regional Manager, National Insurance Co Ltd vs.anita Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2017 + MAC.APP. 426/2015 and CM No.13999/2017 REGIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Amit Gaur for Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate ..... Appellant versus ANITA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.K. Pandey, Adv. for R-1 to 6 with R-1 & 5 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) Arun Kumar Upadhyay, was employed as a constable with 1. Delhi Police and at a time when he was on official duty on 05.05.2013, he suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that occurred due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as rural transport vehicle bus bearing registration no.DL-1VC-0128 (RTV) and died in the consequence. His wife and other members of the family dependent on him, they being first to sixth respondents, instituted accident claim (MACA14213) seeking compensation. MAC Appeal No.426/2015 Page 1 of 4 2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), after inquiry,...
Registrar of Trade Marks Thr Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks vs.sonik ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~1&2 * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P. No.146/2015 & CM No.21927/2015 (for stay) REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Adv. versus KAPOOR SAWS MANUFACTURING CO & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Jain, Adv. for R-1. Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Saurabh Kapoor and Mr. Kapil Kumar, Advs. for R-3&4. AND C.R.P. No.29/2017 & CM No.5066/2017 (for stay) REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS THR DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Ms. Anumita Chandra, Adv. versus SONIK INDUSTRIES & ORS Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Saurabh Kapoor and Mr. Kapil Kumar, Advs. for R-1. Mr. S.M. Gupta, Adv. for R-2&3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER3107.2017 Civil Revision Petition No.146/2015 was instituted impugning the % 1. order, of the Additional District Judge in a suit inter se respondents therei...
Paramjit Singh vs.iocl & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 823/2012 Judgment reserved on: July 26, 2017 Judgment delivered on: July 31, 2017 PARAMJIT SINGH Versus IOCL & ORS Through: Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Adv. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V.N. Koura and Ms. P.K. Benipal, ........ RESPONDENTS Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In view of the above facts and circumstances and in the interest of justice, it is most humbly prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to: (a) Summon the records and issue order, directions or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing impugned decision of the IOCL prescribing Minimum Qualifying Marks in Interview for the post of Junior Operator Grade-I, if any passed by... RESPONDENTS and final Result for the post of Junior Operator Grade-I selecting the... RESPONDENTS No.3 and 4 despite their having lesser marks (combining Written & Interview ...
Harjit Singh vs.m/s Bharat Hotels Ltd. And Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % HARJIT SINGH RFA No.666/2017 31st July, 2017 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajnish K. Gaind, Mr. Hemant Kaushik and Mr. Maninder Kaur, Advocates. M/S BHARAT HOTELS LTD. AND ANR. versus Through: Ms. ........ RESPONDENTS Purnima Maheshwari, CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Advocate. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.26877/2017 (Delay of 65 days in filing the appeal) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing is condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM No.26878/2017 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.666/2017 Page 1 of 11 RFA No.666/2017 & CM No.26876/2017 (U/o XLI R27CPC) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/plaintiff impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 17.12.2016 dismissing the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 3,50,0...
Prof. s.p. Narang vs.univesity of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: July 11, 2017 Judgment delivered on: July 31, 2017 + W.P.(C) 3705/2002 PROF. S.P. NARANG UNIVESITY OF DELHI Versus Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Ms. Minal Sehgal and Mr. Varun Nagrath, Advs. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 4th March, 2002 passed by the Executive Council of the respondent University whereby he has been disengaged from the services of the University.2. Some of the facts are, the petitioner was appointed as Lecturer in Sanskrit in the Department of Post-graduate (Evening Studies, University of Delhi) on October 10, 1970, and thereafter as the Head of the Department in July, 1996. It is the case of the petitioner and also contended by Mr. R.K. Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner that as a Head of the Depar...
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma & Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~ * % + W.P.(C) 6289/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :27.07.2017 Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2017 SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA & ORS Through: Mr B.R. Sharma, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Through: Mr Gautam Narayan, ASC for R-1 Mr Bheem Sain Jain, Adv. for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 There are five petitioners before this Court. They are aggrieved by the order passed by the Financial Commissioner dated 05.08.2011 wherein the Financial Commissioner in terms of the aforenoted order in appeal proceedings {under Section 21 (4) read with Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation & Prevention of Fragmentation) Act,1948} had upheld the order passed by the Settlement Officer dated 20.12.2010. While passing a detailed order, he had held that the order dated 08.05.2001 passed by the Collector (heavily relied upon by the petitioners) is without W.P.(C) No.6289/2011 Page...
Kishan Chand vs.tejbhan & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 07.2017 CS(OS) 1526/2012 KISHAN CHAND TEJBHAN & ANR versus ..... Plaintiff ..... Defendant Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiff For the Defendant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani, Advocate. Mr. Rajendra Singhvi, Adv. for D-1 Mr. Anshu Mahajan, Adv. for D-2 : : JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) IA No.8586/2017 (under Order XXIII Rules 1 and 3 CPC) 31.07.2017 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for partition and permanent injunction. The plaintiff and the defendants are brothers and sons of late Sh. Jagat Ram.2. The parties have filed the application under Order XXIII Rules 1 and 3 CPC. The application is signed by the parties and is supported by their affidavits.3. The parties were referred to Mediation. CS(OS) 1526/2012 Page 1 of 3 4. During the process of mediation, the parties have settled their disputes and executed the Settlement Agreement dated...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.roshan Jahan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:31. t July, 2017 + MAC APPEAL11032016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath & Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advs. versus ROSHAN JAHAN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.K. Sharma, Adv. for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent earning his livelihood from small tailoring job, suffered injuries in motor vehicular accident that occurred on 25.05.2009 involving rash driving of water tanker bearing No.DL1K3820 admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant insurance company. On her claim petition (MACT No.4624/2016), the tribunal held inquiry. It was found that the claimant had suffered fracture in both her legs which required prolonged hospital treatment rendering her immobile for seven months, the surgical procedure requiring steels rods to be inserted in each of the lower limbs. The tribunal, upholding her case of accident ...
Sanjay Mishra vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$-30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1232/2017 SANJAY MISHRA .Petitioner Through: Mr.Dushyant Sisodiya, Advocate. Versus STATE .Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the state alongwith S.I. R.R. Hudala from Police Station Dwarka, Sector 23. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER3107.2017 1. By this petition filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in F.I.R No.248/2015 under Section 380/419/420/467/468/471/120B/34 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Dwarka Sector -23, New Delhi.2. The facts, in brief, as mentioned in the complaint are that the complainant Navneet Singh Bhatia alleged that accused Manmeet Singh Bhatia (Real Brother of Complainant) stole the original property documents in respect of flat No.106, Type M, Block 8, Kendriya Vihar, Sector. 56 Gurgaon, Haryana, of the complainant and sold the same to accused Charanjeet Singh on 11.08.2014 by forging his sig...
Desraj vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~R-14A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 31, 2017 CRL.A. 287/2002 Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant versus % + DESRAJ STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with ASI Tulli Ram PS Badarpur PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant Desraj has preferred the appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C. assailing the judgment dated 22nd March, 2002 and order on sentence dated 23rd March, 2002 vide which he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for one year with fine of 1000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for two months.2. In brief, the prosecution case is that on 24th June, 2000 on receipt of DD No.6A, SI Vijay Kumar along with Constable Ramesh reached at the place of occurrence at D-Block, Gali No.7, Om Vihar, Delhi. On coming to know that injured Ram Ji Chorasia has been removed to AIIMS, he reached there and found PW-2, Ram Ji ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »