Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Galderma s.a. Vs.velite Healthcare
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1618/2016 GALDERMA S.A. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr. Raunaq Kamath, Advocate. versus VELITE HEALTHCARE Through: None. ..... Defendant Reserved on :20. h July, 2017 Date of Decision:31. t July, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 8027/2017 1. Present application has been filed under Order VIII Rule 10 read with Order XIII-A Rules 3 and 6(1)(a) read with Section 151 CPC.2. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed seeking a permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright, passing off etc. against the defendant. At the outset, learned CS (COMM) 1618/2016 Page 1 of 13 counsel for plaintiff stated that he is pressing only prayers 27(a) to (c) of the plaint. The said prayers are reproduced hereinbelow:-"27. It is, therefore, prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to grant: a) An order of permanent injunction restra...
Jetpur Somnath Tollways Limited vs.national Highways Authority of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
* IN THE H IGH CO URT OF DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI Judgment reserved on:28. h July, 2017 % Judgment delivered on:31. t July, 2017 + O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 221/2017 JETPUR SOMNATH TOLLWAYS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent AND + O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 227/2017 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ........ Petitioner Versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. Advocates who appeared in OMP(I) (COMM.) 221/2017 For the... Petitioner : ........ RESPONDENTS For the Respondent : Mr Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate and Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajay Sondhi and Mr. Abhinav Dhingra, Advocates. Mr Prag P.Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Ms Gunjan Sinha Jain, Mr Mukesh Kumar, Mr Rishabh Kapur and Ms Bhavana Duhoon, Advocates for NHAI/R-1. Advocates who appeared in OMP(I) (COMM.) 227/2017 For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Senior Advocate with Mr Mayank Grover, Ms Isha J.Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondent : Mr Prag P.Tripathi, Senior Advocate wi...
M/S Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.suresh Mehta & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.669/2017 31st July, 2017 Through: Mr.Sandeep Jha, Adv. % M/S ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .. Appellant SURESH MEHTA & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... RESPONDENTS versus To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the appellant insurance company challenging the impugned judgment dated 23.02.2017 whereby the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.10,53,177/- along with interest has been decreed.2. The subject suit was filed by the respondent/plaintiff pleading that it had insured with the appellant consignment of 1488 RFA No.669/2017 Page 1 of 7 cartons of fruit juice weighing 19497 kgs of the value of Rs.9,15,619.63 and which consignment was covered under the invoice numbers 73 to 75 dated 22.03.2010. The cartons in question of fruit juice were loaded from Bhiw...
Vidya Technoart and Anr vs.national Council of Educational Research Tr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5939/2017 & CM No.24674/2017 VIDYA TECHNOART AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Vivek Gupta and Mr Nikhilesh, Advocates. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH TRAINING (NCERT) AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr R. K. Singh and Ms Deepa Rai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER3107.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:-"(a) Issue writ or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/direction for quashing the Order bearing No.F.1-4/2015-16/Kits/DEK (Policy RT) DEK, NCERT dated 03.07.2017 issued by respondents;The respondents (hereafter 'NCERT') had issued a Notice Inviting Tender dated 22.12.2016 (hereafter 'the NIT') inviting bids for supply of Educational Kits through Central Public Procurement e-tender system. The petitioners had submitted their respective bids, which were rejected at the W.P.(C) 5939/20...
Anjali Gupta vs.naveen Goel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~10 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate Through: Ms. Shabnam Sheikh, Advocate ..... Respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ANJALI GUPTA * + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 8/2017 Versus NAVEEN GOEL CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER3107.2017 CM APPL. No.2451/2017 (condonation of delay) 1. The present application has been filed by the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 90 days in filing the accompanying appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court. The appeal assails the judgment and decree dated 08.09.2016 passed by the learned Family Court allowing a joint petition filed by the appellant and the respondent under Section 13 B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, for seeking dissolution of marriage and grant of a decree of divorce.2. The explanation offered by the appellant for seeking condonation of delay is that she was unaware of the technicalities of law; that the respondent no.1 has obtained a divorce on playing a fraud on her;...
Union of India vs.a.c. Mathur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.11059/2015 Reserved on:20. h March, 2017 UNION OF INDIA Date of Decision :31. t July, 2017 ....Petitioner Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate. A.C. MATHUR Versus Respondent Through Ms. Rekha Palli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashish Nischal, Advocate. % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.The impugned order dated 7th July, 2015 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi (Tribunal, for short) allows O.A.No.3591/2013 and quashes the Memorandum dated 8th November, 2012 initiating disciplinary proceedings for imposition of minor penalty against A.C. Mathur, the respondent, under Rule 16 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (Rules, for short).2. In short, the Tribunal has held that the respondent was earlier given a recordable warning for the same charge and, therefore, it is impermissible for t...
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd vs.gaura Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31st July, 2017 $~33 * % + MAC.APP. 483/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni and Mr. Pavan Kumar, versus ..... Appellant Advs. GAURA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Upadhyay and Mr. Rajiv Ranjn Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.6,34,104/- has been awarded.2. The accident dated 31st December, 2011 resulted in the death of Hemant who was travelling in a Swift car bearing No.DL8W3278which met with an accident on 31st December, 2011. The deceased was survived by his grand-mother and two brothers who filed the application for compensation before the Claims Tribunal.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.6,656/-, deducted 50% towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 14 to compute the loss of dependency as Rs.5,59,104/-. The Claim...
Ritu Bhatia vs.ministry of Civil Supplies Consumer Affairs & Public Di ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA1602015 & CMs 5244/2015, 7650/2015 Reserved on:4. h July,2017 Date of decision :31st July, 2017 RITU BHATIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.Mukherjee and Mr.Avijit Singh, versus Advs. MINISTRY OF CIVIL SUPPLIES CONSUMER AFFAIRS & PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Dev P.Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Satya Prakash Singh, Adv. for R- 1/UOI Mr.Saurav Agarwal, Mr.A.Tiwari, Advs. for R-2-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. The Appellant, by way of the present Appeal has challenged the Judgment/Order dated 02.02.2015 passed by the Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) 977/2015 dismissing the aforesaid Writ Petition.2. In the aforesaid Writ Petition, the appellant had impugned the Order dated 02.01.2015 passed by the Respondent No.2, terminating the service of the Appellant on the ground that her appointment was done in violation of selection norms which were advertised on 26...
School Management of G D Salwan School vs.directorate of Education and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: July 20, 2017 Judgment delivered on: July 31, 2017 + W.P.(C) 8175/2014, CM No.19019/2014 SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF G D SALWAN SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Adv. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, Adv. for R-1 with Mr. K.N. Singh, DEO Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner School challenging the order dated April 22, 2014 whereby the respondent No.1 has directed the petitioner School to refix the pay of the respondent No.2 in the scale of Rs.5500-9000 instead of Rs.4500- 7000 from the date of her joining i.e October 11, 2005 and release the consequential arrears thereof as per Rules.2. It is the submission of Mr. Vinay Sabharwal that the respondent No.2 was appointed in the petitioner School on October 11, 2005 as PET in the scale of ...
Ajay Khosla vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2017
$~21 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 81/2015 AJAY KHOSLA Through Mr. Arvind Bhatt, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kiran Singh, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Azhar, Advocate for R-2, 3 and 4. Date of Decision:31. t July, 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Sections 222 and 286 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of probate in respect of Will dated 09th May, 2011 of the deceased Dr.Sarla Khosla.2. It has been averred in the petition that the petitioner is the nephew of the deceased Dr.Sarla Khosla, who expired on 12th April, 2013. It has been further averred that Dr.Sarla Khosla was unmarried and died issueless. The deceased is stated to have executed a registered Will dated 09th May, 2011, which was duly attested by Sh.Maneesh Bawa and Smt. R.Beena. The Will dated 09th May, 2011 executed by the deceased is reproduced hereinbelow...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »