Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd vs.om Prakash & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
$~12 to 15 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h July, 2017 + MAC.APP. 478/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. versus SUKHPAL SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Rai, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person. + MAC.APP. 480/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. versus OM PRAKASH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Rai, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person. + MAC.APP. 481/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. versus SURAJ PAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Rai, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person. MACA4782015 etc. Page 1 of 8 + MAC.APP. 320/2016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. ..... Appellant versus BEENA PURI &...
Ujjwal Anand Sharma vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
$~11 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6408/2017 % Date of decision :27. h July, 2017 UJJWAL ANAND SHARMA Through : ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Vibhu Tripathi, Advs. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition asserting that it has been filed in public interest seeks the following prayers : Issue an order, direction or writ in the nature of A. mandamus directing the revoke/suspend under Section 5E(1) of The Cinematograph Act, 1952 the censor certificate granted to the Hindi feature film titled as Indu Sarkar. respondent authorities the B. Issue an order, direction to appoint a committee to see the entire film and submit a report to this court on the following scene found to be objectionable/defamatory in the WP(C)No....
Pamela Manmohan Singh vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
$~9 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 362/2000 PAMELA MANMOHAN SINGH ..... Appellant STATE & ORS. Through: Mr. Mahendra Rana, Advocate. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % The present appeal was adjourned sine die vide order dated ORDER2707.2017 04.03.2014 with liberty granted to the parties to approach this Court after the Supreme Court decides the inter-se disputes.2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly states that much water has flown under the bridge after 04.03.2014 inasmuch as the learned Single Judge in Suit No.2and Probate No.and Probate No.has passed a consent order on 01.08.2016, whereunder liberty has been given to the other side to cross examine the petitioner in Probate No.19/97.3. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 5 submitted that pursuant thereto, a challenge laid by some intervenors, who had approached the Supreme Court by fili...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.rupashi Verma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27th July, 2017 $~22 * % + MAC.APP.332/2014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur and Mr. Amit Gaur, Advs. versus RUPASHI VERMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Kohli, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal 1. whereby compensation of Rs.56,29,500/- has been awarded to respondent no.1.2. On 9th January, 2008 at about 7:55 P.M., Roop Singh Verma and her granddaughter, Rupashi Verma were returning to their residence from R.K. Puram Market on scooter No.DC9E1432when a TATA Sumo bearing No.HR38LT1854hit their scooter on the Ring Road near Sector 12, CNG Pump, R.K. Puram. The accident resulted in death of Roop Singh Verma and grievous inuries to Rupashi. MAC.APP.332/2014 Page 1 of 30 3. Rupashi Verma was 8 years old at the time of accident. She suffered neuroparalysis and became paralyzed after the accident...
The Cpio, Ministry of Home Affairs vs.central Information Commissioner ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1949/2017 THE CPIO, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS ........ Petitioner Through Mr Rahul Sharma, Ms Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Mr C.K. Bhatt, Advocates. versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & ANR Through Mr Nikhil Barwankar, Mr Pankaj Sharma, Mr Shobhit K. and Mr Varsha Ranjan, Advocates for R2. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2707.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (CPIO) has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 21.11.2016 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC) directing the petitioner to inform whether any security clearance was given to one Shri Hameed Ali who is stated to be working with M/s Jet Airways Ltd. on senior management positions.2. Respondent no.2 had filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act) on 19.04.2015, inter alia, seeking the following information:-"Under the provisions of RTI please supply the following W.P. ...
Glaxo Group Limited vs.aar Ess Remedies Private Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h July, 2017 CS(COMM) 1328/2016 GLAXO GROUP LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Ms. Shwetasree Majumdar, Ms. versus Tanya Varma and Mr. Utkarsh Joshi, Advocates. AAR ESS REMEDIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS...... Defendants Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.11786/2016 (under Order XI Rule 1 (4) (as amended by the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015) 1. By this application the plaintiff had sought leave to file the additional documents if need be.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks to withdraw the application as no further documents are required to be filed.3. The application is dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. Nos. 11787/2017 and 8435/2017 (under Section 151 CPC) 1. By this application the plaintiff seeks to place the figures relating to the sales and promotional expenditure incurred by the plaintiff towards...
Parveen Kumar Wadhwa & Ors vs.ram Mehar Tyagi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h July, 2017. RC.REV. No.134/2016 & CM No.7208/2016 (for stay) PARVEEN KUMAR WADHWA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Shalini Kapoor, Ms. Ruhini Dey & Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Advs. Versus Through: Mr. Gaurav Tyagi R-1(g) in person. ........ RESPONDENTS RAM MEHAR TYAGI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order (dated 23rd December, 2015 in E.No.237/2011 of the Court of Additional Rent Controller (ARC) (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi) of dismissal of the application filed by the petitioners for leave to defend the petition for eviction filed by the respondents under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioners from two shops situated on the ground floor of property no.WZ-1 / WZ-4A being part of Khasra No.4027/2785/73min of Village Basai Darapur, New Delhi 110...
Jyoti Jha & Ors vs.kamal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27th July, 2017 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate $~20 * % + MAC.APP. 1016/2013 JYOTI JHA & ORS KAMAL & ORS versus Through: Ms. Shanta Devi Raman and Ms. ........ RESPONDENTS Harsh Lata, Advocates for respondent No.3 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal to the extent that the Claims Tribunal has exonerated respondent No.3 from the liability of paying the compensation on the ground that the alleged Cover Note of the offending vehicle was fake.2. The relevant portion of the impugned order is reproduced hereunder: - 10. Now, coming to the issue whether the vehicle was insured at the time of accident.11. R3W1 has stated that the insurance cover note no.39125572 for the period from 02.09.2011 to 01.09.2012 Ex.R3Wfiled alongwith the claim petition was found fake in verification from the records. The company had issued the cover note n...
Padmanabh Upadhyay vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-27-2017
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP(C) 436/2017 Date of decision :27. h July, 2017 PADMANABH UPADHYAY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Mr.A.K.Dubey, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr.Sri Ram Krishna, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) The writ petitioner Padmanabh Upadhyay, prays for quashing of the order dated 2nd May, 2016 and seeks restoration of offer of appointment and directions to the respondents to appoint him as Assistant Commandant (DE), in the Border Security Force (BSF).2. The facts are not in dispute. The petitioner had appeared in the Central Armed Police Force (Assistant Commandant) Exam 2012, for the post of Assistant Commandant (DE). On being successful, vide offer of appointment letter dated 11th December, 2014, he was directed to report to the Director, BSF WP(C) 436/2017 Page 1 Academy at Tekanpur, Gwal...
Abhay Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-26-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ABHAY SINGH Judgment Reserved on: July 20, 2017 Judgment Delivered on: July 26 , 2017 CRL.A.968/2015 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Vikram, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State ..... Respondent JUDGMENT1 This jail appeal has been filed by the appellant/convict against the judgment dated 6th July, 2015 whereby he has been convicted for committing the offences punishable under Sections 376/506(I) IPC & Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 in short POCSO. Vide order on sentence dated 8th July, 2015, the appellant has been sentenced as under:-"(i) Under Section 376 IPC R.I. for a period of seven years with fine of ` 2,000/- and in default, to undergo SI for three months (ii) Under Section 506(I) SI for a period of one year IPC CRL.A.968/2015 Page 1 of 22 (iii) Under Section 6 of POCSO Act R.I. for a period of ten years with ...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »