Skip to content

Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 27 2017

Lalita Sharma vs.kalawati

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

* + % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.109/2017 RSA No.123/2017 27th July, 2017 RSA No.109/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.13477/2017 LALITA SHARMA KALAWATI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jawahar Chawla, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent + RSA No.123/2017 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 15155/2017, 15225/2017 YOGESH KUMAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jawahar Chawla, Advocate. AMARNATH versus Through: Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. Nos. 15156-57/2017 (for exemptions) in RSA No.123/2017 Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. RSA Nos. 109/2017 and 123/2017 Page 1 of 15 RSA No.109/2017 RSA No.123/2017 1. These Regular Second Appeals are filed by the plaintiffs in the suits against the impugned judgments of the first appellate court dated 26.11.2016. The first appellate cou...


Jul 27 2017

Nitin Chawla vs.state Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1216/2017, Crl. M.A. No.11415/2017 NITIN CHAWLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Sethi, and Ms. Anshika Sethi, Advocates. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ....Respondent Through: Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State with Insp. Sushma Saxena P.S. Defence Colony. Mr. Nitender Sharma Advocate for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2707.2017 1. This is an application under Section 439 Cr.PC for grant of interim bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.115/2016 under Section 498A/304B/34 IPC registered at Police Station - Defence Colony, filed in the month of June, 2017 on the ground of serious illness having been diagnosed, to be suffering from acute backache with PIVC i.e. Prolapsed Inter Vertebral Disc and also diagnosed with renal stone which is causing acute abdominal pain. The petitioner was also found to be suffering from acute depression and neurosis for which he is being treated inside the jai...


Jul 27 2017

Vimal Prasad Semwal & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $- * + % W.P.(C.) No.5536/2017 VIMAL PRASAD SEMWAL & ORS. Date of Decision:27. 07.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for CORAM: R-1 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have impugned the order dated 03.12.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.4074/2014, whereby the said Original Application of the petitioner has been dismissed.2. The petitioners - who are 23 in number, had preferred the Original Application to seek a direction for grant of pay scale of Rs. 330-480 (pre- revised) as given to the other optical workers, vide order dated 01.08.2013 in pursuance of the order passed by the Allahabad Bench of Central Administrative Tribunal (Allahabad Tribunal) in O.A. No.s 956-960/2008 on 08.02.2011. W.P.(C.) No.5536/201...


Jul 27 2017

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd vs.suraj Pal & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

$~12 to 15 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h July, 2017 + MAC.APP. 478/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. versus SUKHPAL SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Rai, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person. + MAC.APP. 480/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. versus OM PRAKASH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Rai, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person. + MAC.APP. 481/2015 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. versus SURAJ PAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhishek Rai, Advocate for R-2 along with R-2 in person. MACA4782015 etc. Page 1 of 8 + MAC.APP. 320/2016 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Onkar Nath, Adv. ..... Appellant versus BEENA PURI &...


Jul 27 2017

Balraj Dhingra vs.the Registrar of Co-Operatvie Societies & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1674/2015, CM No.3015/2015 & CM No.5171/2016 BALRAJ DHINGRA THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATVIE SOCIETIES & ORS Through: Mr. J.C. Mahindro, Advocate. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC for GNCTD along with Ms. Niti Jain, Advocate for RCS. Ms. Iti Sharma, Advocate along with Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for Society/Administrator.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia ORDER2707.2017 for quashing/setting aside the proceedings of inspection initiated by the respondent No.1/ RCS under Section 61, in terms of an order dated 03.10.2012.2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/RCS states that pursuant to the order dated 03.10.2012, the Assistant Registrar submitted his report under cover of letter dated 27.12.2013. The said inspection report has been enclosed as an Annexure P-14 in the conne...


Jul 27 2017

Suranjan De & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

$~24 * + 1.2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 703/2017 SURANJAN DE & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anupam Dwivedi, Advocate along with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for the State with SI Ravi Shankar Tyagi, PS Saket, Delhi. Mr. Harvir Singh Taneja, Advocate along with Mr. Danie Robert, AR of No.2/company. respondent the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER2707.2017 % The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.441/2016, registered on 30.05.2016 with PS Saket, Delhi, under Section 408 IPC. It is submitted that the petitioner no.1 was working as Chief Executive Officer with the respondent No.2 company/complainant w.e.f. 14.06.2013, whereas the petitioner No.2 was Deputy General Manager (Operations) w.e.f. 02.02.2...


Jul 27 2017

Mehar Singh Rathee vs.union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 27, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Adv. with Mr. Alex Joseph, Adv. % + W.P.(C) 626/2016 MEHAR SINGH RATHEE versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Adv. with Mr. Kavindra Gill, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following reliefs:-"It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to:-"(i) Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of the mandamus or any other writ, order or direction in the like nature quashing the Order No.F.No.1/3/2006 - IT&IIC dt. 06.08.2012 and directing the respondent to grant pension with all pensionary benefits and cghs facilities, as granted to other employees with all arrears and interest @ 18% p.a. and all consequential benefits with all arrears, (ii) Issue an appropriate writ in the nature of the mandamus or any other ...


Jul 27 2017

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.m/s Malhotra Traders

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.280/2016 + % NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. 27th July, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Advocate. Through: versus M/S MALHOTRA TRADERS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.S.Dhir, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the first appellate court dated 27.1.2016. The first appellate court vide its impugned judgment dated 27.1.2016 has set aside the judgment of the trial court dated 28.9.2013 whereby the trial court had dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs.1,57,300/- filed by the respondent/plaintiff claiming the amount of the value of the vehicle covered under the insurance policy. The first appellate court while allowing the first appeal and decreeing the suit RSA No.280/2016 Page 1 of 8 filed by the res...


Jul 27 2017

Jagannath vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

$~27 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 591/2017 JAGANNATH ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Joshi, Ms. Anindita Das, Advocates. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER2707.2017 By this application filed under Section 439 of the Code of 1. Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in FIR No.28/2016 dated 24.05.2016 registered at Police Station - Special Cell under Section 18/29/of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as NDPS Act).2. The case of the prosecution as also observed by the Special Judge NDPS, Patiala House Courts, is that: ...(b)on 24.05.2016 SI Raj Singh received secret information that two members of the said syndicate namely Nand Ram and Mangli Ram would come from Bareilly in their Bolero Jeep No.UP87 0282 via outer Ring Road ,ISBT, Kashmere Gate and Burari Chowk and they would ha...


Jul 27 2017

Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson(publ) vs.mergury Elegtronigs & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-27-2017

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 07.2017 CS(COMM) 155/2017, CC5663/2013, IA. 7690/2016, I.A. 8278/2016, I.A. 8808/2016, I.A. 9972/2016, I.A. 11332/2016, I.A. 12393/2016, I.A. 12402/2016, I.A. 12402/2016, I.A. 15482/2016, CCP (O) 7/2017 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON(PUBL)...........Plaintiff Through: Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Prathiba Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chander Lall, Ms. Saya Ghaudhary, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Mr. Adithya Sayaraj, Mr. Rupin Bahl, Ms. Sutapa Jana and Mr. Devarishu Khanna, Advocates. versus MERGURY ELEGTRONIGS & ANR ........Defendants Through: Mr. Gurukrishna Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashok K Agarwal, Advocate along with Mr. Manoratm, Mr. Shubham Agarwal, Mr. Gaurav Vig, and Ms. Pallavi Verma, Advocates for D-2 in-GS(OS) No.442/2013 and respondent No.1 in GGF (O) No.71/2015. Mr. P.V. Kapur, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Ajit Warner, Mr. Sandeep Grover, Mr. Aditya Nayyar, Advocates for R-2 to R-5 in...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial