Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jyoti & Ors vs.national Insurance Company Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~9 & 10 (common order) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h July, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. ..... Appellant + MAC.APP. 236/2016 JYOTI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani, Adv. with Mr. Vikas Yadav, Adv. & Mr. Parvez Zaidi, Adv. Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, Standing Counsel for RSRTC + MAC.APP. 632/2016 and CM APPL.29248/2016 JYOTI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani, Adv. with Mr. Vikas Yadav, Adv. & Mr. Parvez Zaidi, Adv. versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS. Through: Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. ...... RESPONDENTS Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, Standing Counsel for RSRTC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) MACA2362016 etc. Page 1 of 6 1. Vinod Yadav, 30 years old at that time, suffered death due to injuries inflicted upon him in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 27.01.2013 in District Bikaner, Rajasthan due to rash driving of bus bearing registration No.RJ-07PA-4841 (the...
The British Broadcasting Corporation (Bbc) vs.mr Kuldip Singh Kalra & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h July, 2017 CS(COMM) 1144/2016 THE BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION (BBC) ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Himanshu Deora, Adv. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) MR KULDIP SINGH KALRA & ANR Represented by: Ms. Priyanka Anand, Adv. ..... Defendant IA Nos. 10189/2016 (O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC) & 10191/2016 (O.11 R.4 Comm. Court Act) In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the applications are disposed of as not pressed. CS(COMM.) 1144/2016 1. By the present suit, the plaintiff had prayed for the following reliefs- a) a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their directors/proprietor/partners, their principals, employees, agents, distributors, franchisees, representatives and assigns from using the impugned marks and any other trade marks or trade name which are deceptively or confusingly similar to the Plaintiffs registered mark BBC in any manner whatsoever wi...
Amit Kumar vs.geeta Sagar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~3 * + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 101/2017 & CM265212017 and 21068/2017 1. AMIT KUMAR Through : Ms. Prabha Sharma, proxy counsel for Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus Through : None. GEETA SAGAR CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % The appellant/husband is aggrieved by the order dated 22.2.2017 ORDER2807.2017 passed by the learned Family Courts, Saket, Delhi disposing of an application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 praying inter alia, for maintenance for herself and the two years old minor daughter, who is in her custody. Under the impugned order, the appellant/husband has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- p.m. towards pendente lite maintenance to the respondent w.e.f. 25.11.2016.2. Counsel for the appellant states that from April, 2017 onwards, the appellant has been paying a sum of Rs.12,500/- p.m. as maintenance to the respondent/wi...
M/S Curewell Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Private Limited & Another vs.neut ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 07.2017 CS(COMM) 868/2016 M/S CUREWELL DRUGS & PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER Plaintiffs NEUTEC HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant versus ..... Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Plaintiffs : Mr Ajay Kumar Arora For the Defendant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr Sachin Chugh, Director in person JUDGMENT2807.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CS(COMM) 868/2016 & IA No.8457/2016(stay) 1. Mr Sachin Chug, Director of the defendant Company is present. He has produced his Aadhar Card. Copy of the same is taken on record.2. The plaintiffs have filed this suit for rendition of accounts and permanent injunction against the defendant for infringement of trade mark, copyright and passing off. CS(COMM) 868/2016 Page 1 of 3 3.4. The parties were referred to Mediation. The disputes between the parties have been settled through the process of Mediation. The Settlement Agreement dated ...
Cns Officers Guild (Regd) Through Its Secretary vs.airports Authority ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6415/2017 CNS OFFICERS GUILD (REGD) THROUGH ITS SECRETARY Mr Ashish Dixit, Advocate. ........ Petitioner Through: versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr Digvijay Rai, Advocate for AAI. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER2807.2017 VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.26576/2017 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 6415/2017 & CM No.26575/2017 3. The petitioner, CNS Officers Guild (Regd.) is a cadre based association of CNS employees (officers employed in the departments of Communication, Navigation and Surveillance) of the respondent (hereafter 'AAI'). The AAI is a body constituted under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, responsible for discharging the functions as specified under the said Act.4. The petitioner has filed the present petition inter alia praying as W.P.(C) 6415/2017 Page 1 of 8 under:-""a. b. c. Issue an appropriate Writ, Direction or Or...
United India Insurance Co Ltd vs.jagat & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~11 * % + MAC.APP. 55/2012 Date of Decision:28. h July, 2017 ..... Appellant UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. for versus Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. JAGAT & ORS Through: Mr. Arvind Chaudhary and Ms. Asha ........ RESPONDENTS Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the award of the claims Tribunal 1. whereby compensation of Rs.7,24,200/- has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. On 6th December, 2005 at 7.55 AM, Mohd. Anwar Hassan was operating the crane for loading/unloading of containers at CCI Empty Yard, Tughlakabad, New Delhi and Jagat was putting the hook of the crane in the hole of the container when the driver suddenly and abruptly put the crane in motion to pick up the container in upward direction due to which Jagat fell down on the floor and suffered fracture in the spinal cord and fracture in both the forearms. Jagat was taken to Safdarjung Hospital where h...
Rizwan & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~45 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2145/2017 RIZWAN & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.D.K. Santosh, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Kamna Vohra, ASC for State with SI Gaurav, P.S. Vivek Vihar. Mr.S.K. Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER2807.2017 Crl.M.A. 12038/2017 (exemption) % Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 2145/2017 1.2. 3. Notice. Learned Additional Standing counsel, who appears on an advance copy, accepts notice. Notice to respondent No.2 also. She appears in person and is duly identified by the IO SI Gaurav. She is represented by counsel. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.0606/20...
Preety Vaid vs.anand Vaid
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate versus PREETY VAID + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 127/2017 and CM No.26404-05/2017 ANAND VAID CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % Through : None. ORDER2807.2017 ..... Respondent 1. The appellant/wife is aggrieved by an order dated 12.5.2017 passed by the learned Family Court, North-West, Rohini, Delhi granting her visitation rights to meet the minor child of the parties aged 12 years on the third Saturday of every month between 3 pm to 4 pm in the childrens room at the Family Court, Rohini.2. The grievance of the appellant is that she is a permanent resident of District Sambalpur, Orissa and after travelling all the way from there to Delhi on a monthly basis, she gets to meet her son only for one hour which is too little time for her to interact with him.3. Mr. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant states that under the impugned order, learned Family Court...
Krishna Ahuja & Ors vs.reliance General Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~13 to 16 * % + MAC.APP. 259/2015 & CM No.4546/2015, 2444-2445/2016 Date of Decision:28. h July, 2017 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant versus MEENU WADHERA & ORS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R1 and R2. ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 278/2015 & CM No.5035/2015 & 2014/2016 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ..... Appellant versus KRISHNA AHUJA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R1 to R4. + MAC.APP. 128/2016 MEENU WADHERA & ANR Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. ..... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INS CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP.259/2015, 278/2015, 128/2016 & 889/2016 Page 1 of 7 + MAC.APP. 889/2016 KRISHNA AHUJA & ORS Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. ..... Appellants versus RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R...
Suresh Kumar & Ors. Vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 505/2017 & Crl.M.A. 2673/2017 SURESH KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.A.S. Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Megha Bahl, Adv. for Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for State with ASI Sajjan, P.S. Moti Nagar. Mr.Amresh Kumar, Adv. for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 2. ORDER2807.2017 % The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.260/2009, registered on 07.11.2009 with Police Station Moti Nagar, New Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC. The marriage of the petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 was solemnized on 07.12.2008 as per Hindu rites and customs in Delhi. However, no issue out of the said wedlock was born. W.P. (Crl.) No.505/2017 Pag...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »