Delhi Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abc Beverages Private Limited vs.indian Railway Catering & Tourism Cor ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:12. 07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:28. 07.2017 W.P. (C) 2785/2017, CM APPL.12049/2017 Versus ABC BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhiksh Vasudev, Advocate. INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION (IRCTC) LTD. & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The... Petitioner is engaged in carrying out the business of manufacturing and trading of water, beverages, distilled water etc. It is aggrieved by the rejection of its technical bid by the first respondent (hereafter IRCTC) on 07.03.2017. The bid was submitted in response to a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 06.10.2016 for selection of developer for setting up &operation of Rail Neer Packaged Drinking Water Plants at Sankrail (Howrah) & Dist. Hapur (UP.).2. IRCTC had originally floated the NIT on 06.10.2016, and thereafter revised i...
Mithlesh & Anr vs.rajesh Kumar & Ors (Oriental Insurance Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~17 * % + MAC.APP. 639/2015 Date of Decision:28. h July, 2017 ..... Appellants MITHLESH & ANR Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. versus RAJESH KUMAR & ORS (ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD) Through: Mr. Ashok Mittal and Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advs. for R2. Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Adv. for R3. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.4,22,000/- has been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.2. On 05th April, 2014 at 10th May, 2014 at 12:05 P.M., Sahil Kumar was going from Rohtak to Sonepat on motorcycle bearing No.DL-9SX-4386 near Bhaloth Village when he was hit by truck bearing No.HR-56-8652 which resulted in fatal injuries. The deceased was working as a Assistant Engineer (Production) with HPL Electric & Power Pvt. Ltd. earning Rs.14,000/- per month. The deceased was survived by his parents who filed t...
Sbi General Insurance Co Ltd vs.geetu & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28. h July, 2017 + MAC.APP. 658/2017 and CM2663526636/2017 SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate ..... Appellant versus GEETU & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (MACP) 1instituted by the first to fourth respondents herein (the claimants) related to the death of Constable Yogesh Kumar, a member of Delhi traffic police in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 10.04.2015 at about 1.15 p.m. at a traffic police check point near underpass on National Highway 8, Rajokri opposite City Park Hotel, Rajokri, New Delhi in which he was crushed to death by a truck bearing no.HR-38T-2946 which was admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the appellant insurance company (insurer).2. The Tribunal, after inquiry, on the basis of evidence led, accepted the case of the claimants about the death havin...
Prabhat Gandhi & Anr. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~33 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1234/2017 PRABHAT GANDHI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Rajiv Taneja, Adv. with petitioners in person. STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Piyush Singhal, Adv. for Mr.Ashish Agarwal, ASC for State with SI Kuldeep. Mr.Amit Kocher, Adv. for R-2 along with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL ORDER2807.2017 % On taking objection by the learned counsel for the respondent No.2, learned counsel for the petitioner states, on instructions, that he does not press ground (a) of the petition. Ordered accordingly. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.PC) for quashing of the FIR bearing No.226/2016, registered on 18.02.2016 with Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, under Sections 498A/4IPC. The marriage of the petitioner No.1 and the responde...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.hari Bahadur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~1 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:28. h July, 2017 CM(M) 381/2017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus HARI BAHADUR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Upendera Bahadur, Adv. for R-2 & 3. + MAC.APP. 340/2017 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. R.K. Tripathi, Adv. ..... Appellant versus HARI BAHADUR & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Upendera Bahadur, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On the accident claim case (MACT No.451138/16, old No.261/15) of the first respondent in (MAC Appeal No.340/2017), the tribunal, after inquiry, by judgment dated 19.01.2017, upheld the case that she had suffered injuries in motor vehicular accident that had occurred at 8.45 p.m. on 04.10.2011 at C-Block Main Gate, Saraswati CM(M)381/2017 & conn. Page 1 of 4 Vihar, Delhi, involving negligent driving of three wheelor scooter bearing registration No.DL1J0063(TSR) by the second respond...
Sushma Jain & Ors vs.canara Bank and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6404/2017 and CMs 26503-04/2017 1. SUSHMA JAIN & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Parvinder Singh with Ms. Supreet Kaur, Advocates versus CANARA BANK ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Sanjay Aggarwal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % The present petition has been filed by the petitioners praying inter ORDER2807.2017 alia for quashing/setting aside the order dated 6.6.2017 passed by the learned Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), whereby their appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the condition of pre-deposit of 50% of the amount of debt found to be due and recoverable from them under a Recovery Certificate dated 22.9.2015 issued for a sum of Rs.21,03,737.72/-.2. The records reveal that objections were filed by the petitioner No.1 to the effect that as premises No.A-20/1, Rana Pratap Bagh, Delhi attached by the Recovery Officer is her sole residential premises where s...
Rahul @ Rajender vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~2, 3, 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:28. h July, 2017 + CRL.A. 62/2017 RAHUL @ RAJENDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rakesh Sherawat, Mr. Sheen Sherawat and Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocates THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State alongwith Inspector Ram Sahay and SI Arvind Kumar, P.S. Jaitpur. + CRL.A. 585/2017 VIPIN KUMAR STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Lokur and Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocates versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State alongwith Inspector Ram Sahay and SI Arvind Kumar, P.S. Jaitpur. + CRL.A. 693/2017 RAMAN KUMAR ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State alongwith Inspector Ram Sahay and SI Arvind Kumar, P.S. Jaitpur. Crl.A.Nos.62/2017, 585/2017& 693/2017 Page 1 of 20 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR G.S.SI...
Anil Kumar vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6446/2017 Date of decision :28th July, 2017 ANIL KUMAR Through: Mr.M.D.Jangra, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kamal Kant Jha, Sr. Panel counsel UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(Oral) Anil Kumar, the petitioner was appointed in the Border Road Organization (BSF) at the post of OEM on 17th April, 2009. The petitioner, however, decided to resign and had sent letter of resignation, which was accepted by the Authorities. The petitioner was discharged on 15th September, 2012.2. The petitioner accepted the said position and thereafter, remained quite.3. After more than 18 months the petitioner made a representation on 5th February, 2014 claiming that he had tendered WP(C) 6446/2017 Page 1 his resignation under mental stress on account of domestic problems. The petitioner had three children including two daughters and due t...
Narendra Nath Nanda vs.rajender Nath Nanda and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:28. 04.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:28. 07.2017 (OS) FAO APPL.1579/2017 13/2017, REV.PET.137/2017, CM M/S KIDARSONS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant M/S. HANSA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: None. Versus Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anju Bhattacharya and Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Khatri, Advocates. Mr. Jayant Tripathi with Mr. Dinesh Dahiya and Mr. Abhay Verma, Advocates. CONT.CAS (C) 303/2017 NARENDRA NATH NANDA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Tripathi with Mr. Dinesh Dahiya and Mr. Abhay Verma, Advocates. RAJENDER NATH NANDA AND ANR. Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anju Bhattacharya and Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Khatri, Advocates. FAO (OS) 13/2017, REV.PET.137/2017 & CONT.CAS (C)303/2017 Page 1 of 18 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Facts:1. The appellant company, M/s. Kidarsons Industries Pvt....
Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr vs.chander Sekhar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-28-2017
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:28thJuly, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.388/2008 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR..... Appellants Through: Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Adv. versus CHANDER SEKHAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The respondent, then aged about 17 years, was moving on bicycle on 14.10.2000 and had reached in the area of Lal Mandir at Kirari Road, Delhi when he met with an accident due to which his left upper limb came to be crushed, the treatment and surgical procedure that followed resulting in amputation above elbow rendering him permanently disabled, his physical disability having been certified to be to the extent of 40%, as per the disability certificate issued by Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital (Ex.PW-3/1). He instituted accident claim case (petition No.387/2008) stating that the accident had been caused by a bus bearing registration No.DHP3851(the bus) of the first ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »