Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jitender Kumar vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment dated:5th June, 2017 CRL.A. 1382/2014 & Crl.M.(Bail) 1687/2016, 751/2017 JITENDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Biswajit Kumar Patra, Adv. Mr.Amar Nath, amicus curiae with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State with SI Dinesh Chandra, PS-Keshav Puram CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 25.08.2014 and order on sentence dated 28.08.2014, wherein the appellant Jitender Kumar was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 392/3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on receiving information vide DD No.58B, dated 29.05.2010 to the effect that three boys riding on motorcycle bearing No.DL-8S-AG-8054 had snatched money, mobile phone and ring near Keshav Puram ...
Monu @ Sahil vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 05, 2017 CRL.A. 1207/2015 MONU @ SAHIL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae counsel with Ms. Rakhi Dubey, DHCLSC panel Advocate versus STATE Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, ..... Respondent Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Abhijit Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) 1. JUDGMENT In this appeal, which has been preferred through Jail, the challenge is to appellants conviction under Section 395 of IPC read with Section 34 of IPC. Vide impugned order of 30th May, 2015, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for four years with fine of `5,000/- with default clause.2. The facts as culled out from impugned judgment are as under: - Complainant Deepu Bhardwaj who was examined as PW2 deposed that on 04.12.2013, it was his weekly off. He Page 1 of 5 Crl.A.1207/2015 had his cousin Brijesh Bhardwaj/ PW1 were going to Seema Puri to meet their uncle. At about 1.3...
Savyasachi K. Sahai vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2017
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Review Petition No.242/217 and CM No.21184/2017 in WP(C)No.7955/2015 % SAVYASACHI K. SAHAI Through: Reserved on:30. h May, 2017 Date of decision :5. h June, 2017 ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. U. Hazarika, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani, Mr. Jayant Mohan, Mr. Aamir Khan, Advs. for the review petitioners/impleaders in Mr. Vikram Jetley, CGSC for R-1 & 4 Mr. Rajeev Kr. Yadav, Adv. for Intervenor/applicant CM No.18177/2016 Mr. Wajeeh Shafiq, SC for Delhi Waqf Board with Mohd. Qaseem and Mr. Dhairaj Kapoor, Advs. Mr. Jayant Tripathi and Mr. Dinesh Dahiya, Advs.for R-4/DG ASI Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, SC for DDA Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Adv. for R-5 & 6 and Insp. Jarnail Singh, SHO PS Nizamuddin Ms. Diksha Lal for Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Adv. for SDMC Mr. Mohit Chugh for Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Adv. for DPCC Rev.P. No.242/2017 in W.P.(C)No.7955/2015 Page ...
Rishipal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 05, 2017 + CRL.A. 365/2016 RISHIPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae counsel with Mr. S.K. Sethi DHCLSC Panel Advocate STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Shri Bhagwan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) 1. JUDGMENT Upon finding that appellant had raped the prosecutrix aged 10 years, he has been convicted by trial court for the offence under Section 376 (2) of IPC vide impugned judgment of 21st December, 2015 and vide impugned order on sentence of 22nd December, 2015, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `50,000/- with default clause. The facts as noted in the impugned judgment are that on the statement of prosecutrixs mother (PW-2), FIR of this case was registered as she had disclosed to the police that on 26th February, 2011 Page 1 of 6 Crl.A.365/2016 on returning home a...
Noor @ Noor Mohd. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2017
$~1 * + CORAM: STATE IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:2nd June, 2017 CRL.A. 17/2016 NOOR @ NOOR MOHD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ankur Sood, Adv. with Ms.Romila Mandal and Mr.Uday Bedi, Advs. Mr.Amar Nath, amicus curiae with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State SI Amit Kumar, PS-Farsh Bazar ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 26.09.2015 and order on sentence dated 28.09.2015 wherein the appellant- Noor @ Noor Mohd. was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 392/5IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on receiving information vide DD No.27-A, ASI Ami Chand reached at the spot at Gali No.14, Viashwas Nagar, pertaining to chain snatching and inquired about the same and recorded the statement of the complainant on 16.08.2013 a...
mohd.mustafa @ Vicky vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2017
* (i) + Date of Decision: June 02, 2017 CRL.A. 437/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Appellant MOHD. SAMEER @ RAGHU Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae Counsel with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor (ii) + CRL.A. 821/2015 ..... Appellant MOHD. MUSTAFA @ VICKY Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae Counsel with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Advocate versus STATE Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, ..... Respondent Additional Public Prosecutor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned judgment of 19th January, 2015 holds appellants- Mohd.Mustafa@Vicky and Mohd. Sameer@Raghu guilty of offences CRL.A. 437 & 821 of 2015 Page 1 of 8 under Section 457 of IPC read with Section 34 of IPC and under Section 392 of IPC read with Section 34 of IPC as well as for the offence under Section 397 of IPC and vide impugned order of 22nd January, 2015,...
Gagan Dev Vyas vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment dated:2nd June, 2017 CRL.A. 1050/2016 & CRL.M.(Bail) 1983/2016 GAGAN DEV VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ankur Sood, Adv. with Ms.Romila STATE Mandal and Mr.Uday Bedi, Advs. versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ..... Respondent SI Pankaj Kumar, PS-Vasant Kunj (South) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 16.09.2016 and order on sentence dated 17.09.2016 wherein the appellant- Gagan Dev Vyas was convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 308 IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 29.01.2015 at about 8.00 p.m., the complainant namely Mohan Rao was present at his Jhuggi bearing Jhuggi No.39, Malikpur Kohi, Inder Camp, Rangpuri, New Delhi and in the neighbouring jhuggi No.229 the convict/appellant was hurling abuses in filthy lan...
md.naeem vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 02, 2017 + CRL.A. 548/2015 & Crl.M(B) 887/2017 ..... Appellant MD. NAEEM Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae Counsel with Mr. Sumer Kumar Sethi, DHCLSC with Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor with ASI Vinod Kumar ..... Respondent % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned judgment of 23rd December, 2014 holds appellant guilty for the offence under Sections 3of IPC and also under Section 411 of IPC. In addition, appellant has been held guilty for the offence under Section 397 of IPC on account of using knife in the incident in question. Vide impugned order on sentence of 24th December, 2014, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of `1,000/- for the offence in question under Section 397 of IPC and for the remaining offences, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years each with...
Mayur Pasricha vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2017
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. REV. 436/2017 % Date of Judgment:2. d June, 2017 MAYUR PASRICHA Through: Mr. Rajive Bakshi, Advocate with Ms. Gagandeep Chauhan, Advocate. ....... Petitioner Versus STATE & ANR. CORAM: Through : Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State ....... RESPONDENTS with SI Manish Kumar, EOW. Complainant in person. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. 9851/2017 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CRL. REV. 436/2017 & Crl.M.A. 9850/2017 1. This criminal revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Mayur Pasricha under Sectionof the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short as Code) against the order dated 29.05.2017 passed by the learned Page 1 of 6 Crl. Rev. 436/2017 Additional Sessions Judge-04, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Bail Application No.in FIR No.730/2015, PS Maurya Enclave U/s. 419/420/467/468/471/120B of IPC.2. In fact three separate appl...
mohd.sameer @ Raghu vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2017
* (i) + Date of Decision: June 02, 2017 CRL.A. 437/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Appellant MOHD. SAMEER @ RAGHU Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae Counsel with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor (ii) + CRL.A. 821/2015 ..... Appellant MOHD. MUSTAFA @ VICKY Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae Counsel with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Advocate versus STATE Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, ..... Respondent Additional Public Prosecutor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned judgment of 19th January, 2015 holds appellants- Mohd.Mustafa@Vicky and Mohd. Sameer@Raghu guilty of offences CRL.A. 437 & 821 of 2015 Page 1 of 8 under Section 457 of IPC read with Section 34 of IPC and under Section 392 of IPC read with Section 34 of IPC as well as for the offence under Section 397 of IPC and vide impugned order of 22nd January, 2015,...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »