Skip to content

Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 05 2017

Vikas vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RESERVED ON : JUNE02 2017 DECIDED ON : JUNE05 2017 CRL.A. 322/2016 Through : Ms.Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. ..... Respondent VIKAS STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is a judgment 26.11.2015 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.211/2013 arising out of FIR No.at Police Station Vivek Vihar by which the appellant Vikas was held guilty for committing offences punishable under Sections 376/174A IPC. By an order dated 5.12.2015, he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years with fine `5,000/- under Section 376 IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for one year with fine `1,000/- under Section 174A IPC. Both the sentences were to run concurrently.2. Briefly stated the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 1.4.2009 at about 9.00 a.m. the appellant in a vehicle in Crl.A.322/2016 Page 1 of 8 ...


Jun 05 2017

State Nct of Delhi vs.mohan

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

$~9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Judgment:5. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 270/2016 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State alongwith Inspector Narender Kumar, PS New Usmanpur versus Through : Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate ..... Respondent MOHAN CRL.A. 1181/2016 MOHAN STATE Through : Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State alongwith Inspector Narender Kumar, PS New Usmanpur ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Trial court record has been received.2. Both these appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment.3. For ease of reference, the appellant in Crl.A. 1181/2016, i.e. Mohan, is being referred to as the appellant.4. Crl.A. 1181/2016 has been filed by the convict/appellant against the judgment dated 21.11.2015 and the order on sentence dated 24.11.2015 passed by the Trial Court in SC109201...


Jun 05 2017

Shimla College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3976/2017 & C.M. Nos.17475-17478/2017 % Judgment reserved on:24. h May, 2017 Date of Judgment: :5. h June, 2017 SHIMLA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Through Mr.Sanjay Sharawat, Advocate ..... PETITIONER versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANOTHER Through Mr.Kishan Nautiyal, Advocate ..... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J CM No.17477/2017 (permission to file detailed list of dates & events) This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking permission to file lengthy list of dates and events. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. WP(C) No.3976/2017 1. The petitioner, which is an unaided and self financed educational institution, established by a registered trust namely Shimla Education Society Trust imparting education in various fields including teacher training courses, has approached this Court being aggrieved by the ...


Jun 05 2017

Ajay vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 05, 2017 + CRL.A. 409/2015 DHARMENDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Love Deep Gaur, Advocate and Mr. Animesh Madhukar, DHCLSC Panel Lawyer with Mr. Anshu Bhanot, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Addl. Public Prosecutor for State with SI Shri Gopal, Police Station Shakar Pur ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Vikas Padora, DHCLSC Panel Advocate Versus ..... Respondent Page 1 of 7 + CRL.A. 480/2015 AJAY STATE Crl.A.Nos.409 & 480 of 2015 Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Addl. Public Prosecutor for State with SI Shri Gopal, police station Shakar Pur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT Impugned judgment of 1st December, 2014 holds appellants Dharmender and Ajay guilty of offence under Sections 3of IPC r/w Section 397 IPC and they have been also held guilty for the offence under Section 411 IP...


Jun 05 2017

Babu Ram vs.u.o.i & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BABU RAM Judgment reserved on April 20, 2017 Judgment pronounced on June 05, 2017 W.P (C) No.16726/2006 ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ashish Negi and Mr. Praksh Kumar Singh, Advocates for the Appellant versus U.O.I & ORS. Through R-1/U.O.I Ms. Neelam Singh, Advocate for GNCTD/R-2 Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.1. Challenge in this writ petition is to order dated 08.05.2006 passed in O.A21152005 whereby the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal (in short the Tribunal) refused to grant the appellant herein a higher replacement pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 w.e.f 01.01.1996 to the post of Statistician which was the post held by the petitioner at that time in terms of the recommendation of the 5th Central Pay Commission (in short CPC) and also declined the petitioner the pre 01.01.1996 pay scale parity between the post...


Jun 05 2017

Mohan vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

$~9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Judgment:5. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 270/2016 STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State alongwith Inspector Narender Kumar, PS New Usmanpur versus Through : Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate ..... Respondent MOHAN CRL.A. 1181/2016 MOHAN STATE Through : Mr. Jivesh Tiwari, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State alongwith Inspector Narender Kumar, PS New Usmanpur ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Trial court record has been received.2. Both these appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment.3. For ease of reference, the appellant in Crl.A. 1181/2016, i.e. Mohan, is being referred to as the appellant.4. Crl.A. 1181/2016 has been filed by the convict/appellant against the judgment dated 21.11.2015 and the order on sentence dated 24.11.2015 passed by the Trial Court in SC109201...


Jun 05 2017

Imtiyaz vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:5. h June, 2017 + CRL.A. 730/2016 IMTIYAZ Through: Mr.Habibur Rahman, Adv. ..... Appellant Mr.Amar Nath, amicus curiae with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA STATE Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State SI Kali Charan, PS-Ashok Vihar ..... Respondent I. S. MEHTA, J.JUDGMENT1 The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 21.04.2016 and order on sentence dated 23.04.2016 wherein the appellant-Imtiyaz was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.2. Brief facts stated are that on receiving information vide DD No.26-A, SI Puneet Grewal reached to the spot along with Ct.Nand Kihore and thereafter they came to know that the injured was taken to BJRM hospital, Jahangirpuri where the injured Bunty was found to be admitted in the hospital vide MLC Ex.PW-2/A. The...


Jun 05 2017

Deepak @ Deepu vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: June 05, 2017 CRL.A. 506/2015 DEEPAK @ DEEPU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae counsel with Ms. Rakhi Dubey, DHCLSC Panel Advocate Versus Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, ..... Respondent Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Shri Gopal STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) 1. ORDER In this appeal, the challenge is to the impugned judgment of 1st December, 2014 vide which appellant has been found guilty for the offence under Section 411 of IPC and vide impugned order of 5th December, 2014, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of two years with fine of `5,000/-for the offence under Section 411 of IPC.2. At the outset, it is submitted that appellant, who is on bail and is present in this Court, and as per his Nominal Roll, he has undergone Page 1 of 2 Crl.A.506/2015 sentence of ten months and his conduct in jail has been satisfactory and that he is a poor person. On ...


Jun 05 2017

Om Prakash vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OM PRAKASH STATE RESERVED ON : JUNE01 2017 DECIDED ON : JUNE05 2017. CRL.A. 212/2015 Through : Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant Om Prakash impugns a judgment dated 18.11.2014 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.159/2013 arising out of FIR No.402/2013 PS Vasant Kunj South by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 10 of POCSO Act (In short 'Act'). By an order dated 26.11.2014, he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six years with fine `10,000/-; default sentence being Simple Imprisonment for six months.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 18.09.2013, at around 01.30 p.m. at Jhuggi Shankar Camp, Rangpuri Pahari, the appellant sexually assaulted the prosecutrix 'X' Crl.A.212/2015 Page 1 of 7 (changed nam...


Jun 05 2017

Vikram Raj @ Vicky & Anr vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-05-2017

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 05, 2017 CRL.A. 1573/2014 VIKRAM RAJ @ VICKY & ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae counsel and Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenkashi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Ombir Dabas CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT In this appeal, appellant No.1-Vikram Raj @ Vicky S/o Sh. Tilak Raj and appellant No.2-Surjya Baro S/o Kali Ram Baro assail their conviction for the offences under Section 20 (b) (ii) (B) of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act) and Section 29 of the NDPS Act and order on sentence Page 1 of 4 CRL.A. 1573/2014 vide which they have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for four years with fine of `50,000/- each with default clause for the offence under Section 20 (b) (ii) (B) of the NDPS Act and rigorous imprison...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial