Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suraj Kumar Mukhiya vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 07, 2017 (i) + CRL.A. 1/2015 SANJAY MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Biswajeet Kumar Patra, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (ii) + CRL.A. 2/2015 & Crl.M.(B) 320/2017 SURAJ KUMAR MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (iii) + CRL.A. 469/2015 & Crl.M.(B) 403/2017 UMESH MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (iv) + CRL.A. 504/2015 & Crl. M(B) 479/2017 RANJIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Jatin Rajput, DHCLSC Panel Counsel Versus Page 1 of 6 Crl.A.1/2015 Crl.A.2/2015 Crl.A.469/2015 Crl.A.504/2015 STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sandip Shrivastava, Police Station Maurya Enclave, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT The above capti...
Anoop vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : JUNE05 2017 DECIDED ON : JUNE06 2017 + Crl.A.298/2017 & Crl.M.B.504/2017 ANOOP STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma with Mr.Abhijeeet Sharma, Advocates. versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 26.09.2016 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.20arising out of FIR No.631/2014 at Police Station Sun Light Colony by which the appellant was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 394 IPC, the instant appeal has been preferred by him. By an order dated 26.09.2016, the appellant was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for four years with fine `1,500/- under Section 394 IPC. Crl.A.298/2017 Page 1 of 5 2. Briefly stated the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on on 28.09.2014 at around 1.22 a.m. at Barapulla Flyover, near Ring Road, New Delhi, the appellant a...
Mahesh Chand vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2017
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 54/2017 MAHESH CHAND Judgment dated:6th June, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Mukesh Kr. Singh, Adv. STATE Mr.Amar Nath, Amicus Curie with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State ..... Respondent with ASI Rajbir Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 30.08.2016 and order on sentence dated 31.08.2016 wherein the appellant-Mahesh Chand was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant- Mahesh Chand has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 12.06.2014, on receiving information vide DD No.27-A, ASI Rajbir Singh reached at the spot at X-256, Camp No.1, Nangloi, Delhi, pertaining to quarrel and inquired about the same. On inquiry it was revealed that injured was shifted to hospital where he collected the ML...
State vs.sumit Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + STATE RESERVED ON : MAY05 2017 DECIDED ON : JUNE06 2017 CRL.A. 176/2016 ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. versus SUMIT KUMAR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.G.P.Thareja with Mr.Satender Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the State to impugn the judgment dated 04.01.2013 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.172/2011 emanating from FIR No.208/2011 at Police Station Chhawla by which the respondent Sumit Kumar was acquitted of the charge under Section 376 IPC.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case, as reflected in the charge- sheet was that in the first week of January 2008 at his House No.C-1/1160. Vasant Kunj, New Delhi and thereafter on several occasions at his house and on 21.3.2010 at the victims house at E-269, Shyam Vihar-I, Najafgarh, New Crl.A.176/2016 Page 1 of 7 Delhi, the respondent committed rape upon the prosecutrix X (chan...
Vijay Vaidh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : JUNE06 2017 + CRL.A. 932/2016 VIJAY VAIDH ..... Appellant STATE Through : Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. versus .... Respondent Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in this appeal is a judgment dated 18.04.2016 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.199/2014 arising out of FIR No.524/2014 registered at Police Station Kotla Mubarak Pur, whereby the appellant was held guilty for committing offences punishable under SectionsIPC. By an order dated 30.04.2016, he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for ten years with fine `15,000/- under Section 376 IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years with fine `10,000/- under Section 307 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently. Crl.A.932/2016 Page 1 of 6 2. Briefly stated the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 24.06.2014 at abour 10.15 a.m. at the first floor...
Hunny vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2017
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI HUNNY STATE RESERVED ON : JUNE01 2017 DECIDED ON : JUNE06 2017 CRL.A.841/2016 ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Tarun Khanna for Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus Through : Ms.Meenakshi Dahiya, APP. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 12.04.2016 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.1arising out of FIR No.4registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar by which the appellant Hunny was held guilty for committing offences punishable under SectionsIPC and Section 10 POCSO Act, the instant appeal has been preferred by him. By an order dated 19.04.2016, the appellant was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for five years with fine `5,000/- under Section 10 POCSO Act; Rigorous Imprisonment for two years with fine `1,000/- under Section 363 IPC and Simple Imprisonment for one month with fine of `500/-, under Section 323 IPC. The sentences were to operate concurrently. ...
Tarun Lalla & Anr. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-06-2017
$~8 * + CORAM: STATE IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:6th June, 2017 CRL.A. 1044/2016 TARUN LALLA & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Mukesh Kr. Singh, Adv. Mr.Amar Nath, amicus curiae with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State ASI Rajbir Singh ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 30.08.2016 and order on sentence dated 31.08.2016 wherein the appellant-Tarun @ Lalla was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 12.06.2014, on receiving information vide DD No.27-A, ASI Rajbir Singh reached at the spot at X-256, Camp No.1, Nangloi, Delhi, pertaining to quarrel and inquired about the same. On inquiry it was revealed that injured was shifted to hospital where he collected the MLC of the i...
Mangalmay Institute of Management & Technology and Anr vs.ggsip Univer ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: May 26, 2017 Judgment delivered on: June 05, 2017 + W.P.(C) 2377/2017, CM No.10223/2017 + W.P.(C) 2393/2017, CM No.10328/2017 + W.P.(C) 2465/2017, CM No.10633/2017 + W.P.(C) 3148/2017, CM No.13715/2017 + W.P.(C) 2798/2017, CM No.12198/2017 + W.P.(C) 2955/2017, CM No.12864/2017 MANGALMAY INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY AND ANR ACCMAN BUSINESS SCHOOL AND ANR TRINITY INSTITUTE OF INNOVATION IN PROFESSIONAL STUDIES & ANR INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY GREATER NOIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR DELHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Sacchin Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sanjeev Nasiar, Ms.Mehak Tanwar, Advs. for the petitioners in W.P.(C) No.2393 of 2017 Mr.R.K.Saini, Ms.Asha Jain Madan,, Mr. Varun Nagrath & Mr. Udit Malik Advs. also appearing for the petitioners in W.P.(C) Nos. 2377/2017, 2393/2017, 2465/2017 & 2798/2017 Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Ms.Wami...
Dharmender vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 05, 2017 + CRL.A. 409/2015 DHARMENDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Love Deep Gaur, Advocate and Mr. Animesh Madhukar, DHCLSC Panel Lawyer with Mr. Anshu Bhanot, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Addl. Public Prosecutor for State with SI Shri Gopal, Police Station Shakar Pur ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Vikas Padora, DHCLSC Panel Advocate Versus ..... Respondent Page 1 of 7 + CRL.A. 480/2015 AJAY STATE Crl.A.Nos.409 & 480 of 2015 Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Addl. Public Prosecutor for State with SI Shri Gopal, police station Shakar Pur CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT Impugned judgment of 1st December, 2014 holds appellants Dharmender and Ajay guilty of offence under Sections 3of IPC r/w Section 397 IPC and they have been also held guilty for the offence under Section 411 IP...
Brij Mohan @ Brijesh vs.state (The Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2017
$~R-2 & R-3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 1193/2015 & Crl. M. (Bail). No.680/2017 % BRIJ MOHAN @ BRIJESH Date of Judgment:5. h June, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Advocate with Ms.Tanu, Mr. Sarthak Maggon and Mr. Jitender, Advocates. Versus STATE (THE NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with SI Amit Kumar, PS Amar Colony, Delhi. CRL. A. 1130/2015 + NISHA PANDEY Through: Mr. V.S. Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. ..... Appellant G.P. Singh, Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State with SI Amit Kumar, PS Amar Colony, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Crl. A. 1190/2015 & Crl.A. 1130/2015 Page 1 of 24 G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present criminal appeal No.1193/2015 has been filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the appellant Brij Mohan against the judgment dated 11.09.2015 by which the appellant ha...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »