Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sagir @ Annu vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment dated:7. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 267/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 445/2017 SAGIR @ ANNU ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Puja Shrivastava, Adv. Mr.Amar Nath, Amicus Curie with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. Appellant produced from J/C. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State SI Jasmer Singh, PS-Jahangirpuri ..... Respondent I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 31.08.2016 and order on sentence dated 22.09.2016, whereby the appellant-Sagir @ Annu was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 304(II)/3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 01.01.2012, information was received in Police Station-Jahangirpuri about a quarrel vide DD No.76 B. ASI Naresh along with Ct. Rahul visited the spot for investigation. On reaching the...
Bablu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~15 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BABLU Date of Decision: June 07, 2017 CRL.A. 402/2015 Through: Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, DHCLSC Panel Advocate ..... Appellant Versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor JUDGMENT (ORAL) In this appeal, the challenge is to impugned judgment of 24th September 2013 vide which appellant has been held guilty for the offence under Section 376 of IPC and to impugned order of sentence of 26th September, 2013 vide which he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `10,000/-, with default clause. Appellant also stands convicted and sentenced for the offences under Section 363 of IPC and 366 of IPC to rigorous imprisonment for seven years each, with fine of `5000/- each, with default clause. Trial Court has directed the above sentences to run concurrently. The facts as noted in the impugned judgment are as under:-"Page 1 of 5 Crl.A.No.402/2015 O...
Sita Ram vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of order: June 07, 2017 + CRL.A. 244/2016 SITA RAM + CRL.A. 268/2016 AKHILESH STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Dinesh Malik, DHCLSC Panel Counsel ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel Versus Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, ..... Respondent Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Raj Pal, Police Station Uttam Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 ORDER The above captioned two appeals are directed against common impugned judgment of 12th January, 2016 vide which the appellants in these two appeals have been held guilty for the offence under Section 3of IPC and vide impugned order on sentence, they have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for eight years with fine of `5000/- each, with default clause. Crl.Appeals No.244 & 268 of 2016 Page 1 of 4 2. Since these appeals arise out of common impugned judgment and o...
Salmanuddin vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:7. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 674/2016 & Crl. M. (Bail) 806/2017 SALMANUDDIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Imran Khan, Adv. Mr.Amar Nath, amicus curiae with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State ..... Respondent I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 21.01.2015 and order on sentence dated 22.01.2015, whereby the appellant- Salmanuddin was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 395/365/3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 06.04.2011 at around 10.45 PM, information was received in Police Station-Sangam Vihar about a quarrel. The information was recorded as DD No.34 A and marked to ASI Rajender Singh for investigation, who reached at the spot but no eye witness was found there. At around 3.15...
Ranjit vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 07, 2017 (i) + CRL.A. 1/2015 SANJAY MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Biswajeet Kumar Patra, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (ii) + CRL.A. 2/2015 & Crl.M.(B) 320/2017 SURAJ KUMAR MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (iii) + CRL.A. 469/2015 & Crl.M.(B) 403/2017 UMESH MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (iv) + CRL.A. 504/2015 & Crl. M(B) 479/2017 RANJIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Jatin Rajput, DHCLSC Panel Counsel Versus Page 1 of 6 Crl.A.1/2015 Crl.A.2/2015 Crl.A.469/2015 Crl.A.504/2015 STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sandip Shrivastava, Police Station Maurya Enclave, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT The above capti...
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. Vs.delhi Airport Metro Express Priva ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:7. h June, 2017 FAO(OS) (COMM) 128/2017 DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG and Mr. Ajit Sinha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Johri, Mr. Srijan Sinha, Mr. Ankur Gupta and Mr. Ankit Saini, Advs. versus DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Ms.Malavika Lal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.Appl. No.22275/2017 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CAV.581/2017 3. Since learned counsel for the caveator/respondent is present, the caveat stands discharged. FAO(OS) (COMM) 128/2017 & C.M. Appl.No.22276/2017 (Stay) 4. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 30.05.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in O.M.P (I) (Comm.) FAO (OS) (C OMM) 12...
Khokhan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of order: June 07, 2017 + % CRL.A. 425/2014 & Crl. M(B) 1011/2016 KHOKHAN STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae versus Through: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, Addl. ..... Respondent Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sachin Kumar, Police Station.Amar Colony CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment of 24th January, 2014 vide which appellant has been held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 3of IPC and under Section 397 of IPC. Although appellant was charged for the offence under Section 411 of IPC but trial court has chosen not to hold him guilty for the offence under Section 411 of IPC as appellant already stands convicted for the serious Page 1 of 4 Crl.A.425/2014 offence under Sections 3of IPC. Vide impugned order on sentence of 11th February, 2014 appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of `10,000/- ...
Kuldeep @ Kunda vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment dated:7. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 1089/2016 KULDEEP @ KUNDA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vaibhav Choudhary, Adv. with Mr.S.K.Singh, Adv. Mr.Amar Nath, Amicus Curie with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State SI Jasmer Singh, PS-Jahangirpuri I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 31.08.2016 and order on sentence dated 22.09.2016, whereby the appellant- Kuldeep was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 304 (II)/3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 01.01.2012, information was received in Police Station-Jahangirpuri about a quarrel vide DD No.76 B. ASI Naresh along with Ct. Rahul visited the spot for investigation. On reaching the spot, they came to know that the injure...
Akhilesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of order: June 07, 2017 + CRL.A. 244/2016 SITA RAM + CRL.A. 268/2016 AKHILESH STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Dinesh Malik, DHCLSC Panel Counsel ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel Versus Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, ..... Respondent Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Raj Pal, Police Station Uttam Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 ORDER The above captioned two appeals are directed against common impugned judgment of 12th January, 2016 vide which the appellants in these two appeals have been held guilty for the offence under Section 3of IPC and vide impugned order on sentence, they have been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for eight years with fine of `5000/- each, with default clause. Crl.Appeals No.244 & 268 of 2016 Page 1 of 4 2. Since these appeals arise out of common impugned judgment and o...
Tony @ Afroz vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 640/2015 TONY @ AFROZ Judgment dated:7. h June, 2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Imran Khan, Adv. STATE Mr.Amar Nath, amicus curiae with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State ..... Respondent + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 21.01.2015 and order on sentence dated 22.01.2015 wherein the appellant-Tony @ Afroz was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 395/365/3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 06.04.2011 at around 10.45 PM, information was received in Police Station-Sangam Vihar about a quarrel. The information was recorded as DD No.34 A and marked to ASI Rajender Singh for investigation, who reached at the spot but no eye witness was found there. At around 3.15 a.m., another information...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »