Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
l.d. Joshi vs.central Provident Fund Commissioner & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-09-2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved:18. 05.2017 Judgment Pronounced:09. 06.2017 + W.P.(C) 8996 OF2014L.D. JOSHI ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person. Through versus CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. R.R.Rajesh, Adv for R-1 to 3 Ms.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv for R-4 Ms.T.Archana, Adv for R-5 and 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA The petitioner Mr. L.D. Joshi, who had joined respondent No.6 JUDGMENT1 i.e. M/s. BOSCH Limited at Hosur Road, Adugodi, Bangalore 560030 formerly known as Motor Industries Company Limited (MICO) as Commercial Officer, was allotted employees EPF account No.KN/120/10857F and EPF contributions were made w.e.f. W.P.(C) 8996 OF2014Page 1 of 41 01.09.1984. The petitioner was transferred to the companys Delhi office i.e. M/s. BOSCH Limited at 85-A, Rashyamook, Panchkuin Road, New Delhi (arrayed as respondent No.5) w.e.f. 01.04.1988 and a new EPF account number was opened with respondent No.2,...
Raj Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-08-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 1378/2012 RAJ KUMAR Through Ms.Rakhi Dubey, DHCLSC Panel versus ..... Appellant Advocate STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan, Addl. Public Prosecutor for State ..... Respondent In this appeal, appellant challenges impugned judgment of 21st JUDGMENT (ORAL) January 2012 vide which he has been held guilty of committing offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act) as he was found in illegal possession of 32.560 kgs. of Ganja. Vide impugned order on sentence of even date, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, trial court has directed that appellant shall serve sentence of rigorous imprisonment for nine months. The factual background of this case, as noted in the impugned judgment is as unde...
Kesh Bahadur Gaurang vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 08, 2017 + CRL.A. 813/2012 KESH BAHADUR GAURANG ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, DHCLSC panel counsel STATE Versus Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Yasin Khan, Crime Branch (Narcotics) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL1 The impugned judgment of 30th September, 2011 holds appellant guilty for the offence under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act) and vide impugned order of 7th October, 2011, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, appellant has been directed by the trial court to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year, as on 25th March, 2010, appellant was found to be in illegal possession of 2.5 kgs of charas. Page 1 of 9 Crl.A.813/2012 2. The facts as no...
Kuldeep Raj vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-08-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1188/2012 & CRL.M.A. 19000/2012 Date of decision: June 08, 2017 KULDEEP RAJ Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amish Aggarwala, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR STATE % ORAL1 JUDGMENT The challenge to the impugned judgment of 23rd March, 2011, vide which appellant has been held guilty of illegally possessing 5.072 kgs. of diacetylmorphine (heroin) and order on sentence of 25th March, 2011, vide which appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for twelve years with fine of `1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, trial court has directed appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment of six months.2. The facts as noted in the impugned judgment are as under:-"The proceedings of this case have been initiated on the Directorate of Revenue a complaint Intelligence (hereinafter referred to as DRI) through Sh.D.P. Saxena, Intelligence Officer against the accused f...
Saddam Hussain vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment dated:7. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 435/2016 SADDAM HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Habibur Rahman, Adv. STATE Mr.Amar Nath, amicus curiae with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus Through: Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 21.01.2015 and order on sentence dated 22.01.2015 wherein the appellant- Saddam Hussain was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 395/365/3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 06.04.2011 at around 10.45 PM, information was received in Police Station-Sangam Vihar about a quarrel. The information was recorded as DD No.34 A and marked to ASI Rajender Singh for investigation who reached at the spot but no eye witness was round there. At around 03.15 AM, another info...
Sanjay Mukhiya vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 07, 2017 (i) + CRL.A. 1/2015 SANJAY MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Biswajeet Kumar Patra, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (ii) + CRL.A. 2/2015 & Crl.M.(B) 320/2017 SURAJ KUMAR MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (iii) + CRL.A. 469/2015 & Crl.M.(B) 403/2017 UMESH MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (iv) + CRL.A. 504/2015 & Crl. M(B) 479/2017 RANJIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Jatin Rajput, DHCLSC Panel Counsel Versus Page 1 of 6 Crl.A.1/2015 Crl.A.2/2015 Crl.A.469/2015 Crl.A.504/2015 STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sandip Shrivastava, Police Station Maurya Enclave, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT The above capti...
Albaksh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ALBAKSH Date of Decision: June 07, 2017 CRL.A. 1147/2014 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Azhar Qayum, DHCLSC Panel Advocate versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR (ORAL) JUDGMENT $~9 * + % In this appeal, the challenge is to the impugned conviction and sentence for the offence of rape. The alleged incident is of 8th April, 2010. FIR of this Case has been registered on the statement of Patrolling Officer, who was at DND Flyway. Vide impugned order of 14th December, 2013, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `50,000/- with default clause for raping a subnormal minor girl. The crux of prosecution case, as noted by the trial court in the impugned judgment, is as under:-""In her statement before the court prosecutrix deposed that she along with her father had come from their native Crl.Appeal No.11...
Kanhiya vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1085/2016 Date of order: June 07, 2017 KANHIYA STATE Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, DHCLSC ..... Appellant Panel Advocate Versus Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Chandan Singh ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 ORDER Impugned judgment and sentence holds appellant guilty of the offences under Sections 307/392/394/3of IPC and Section 411 IPC and has sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment of ten years for offence under Sections 307/3IPC with fine of `10,000/- with default clause and for offence under Section 3IPC, he has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for eight years with fine of `2,000/- with default clause. Appellant has been also sentenced for rigorous imprisonment of seven years for offence under Section 3IPC and for offence under Section 411 IPC, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of `1,000/- with...
Phool Kumar @ Golu vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment dated:7. h June, 2017 CRL.A. 1204/2016 PHOOL KUMAR @ GOLU ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Puja Shrivastava, Adv. Mr.Amar Nath, Amicus Curie with Mr.Love Deep Gaur, Adv. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State SI Jasmer Singh, P.S. Jahangirpuri I.S.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The instant appeal is arising out of the judgment dated 31.08.2016 and order on sentence dated 22.09.2016, whereby the appellant- Phool Kumar @ Golu was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 304(II)/3IPC. Aggrieved by the said judgment and order on sentence, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.2. Briefly facts stated are that on 01.01.2012, information was received in Police Station-Jahangirpuri about a quarrel vide DD No.76 B. ASI Naresh along with Ct. Rahul visited the spot for investigation. On reaching the spot, they came to know that the injured...
Umesh Mukhiya vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 07, 2017 (i) + CRL.A. 1/2015 SANJAY MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Biswajeet Kumar Patra, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (ii) + CRL.A. 2/2015 & Crl.M.(B) 320/2017 SURAJ KUMAR MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (iii) + CRL.A. 469/2015 & Crl.M.(B) 403/2017 UMESH MUKHIYA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, DHCLSC Panel Counsel (iv) + CRL.A. 504/2015 & Crl. M(B) 479/2017 RANJIT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Jatin Rajput, DHCLSC Panel Counsel Versus Page 1 of 6 Crl.A.1/2015 Crl.A.2/2015 Crl.A.469/2015 Crl.A.504/2015 STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Sandip Shrivastava, Police Station Maurya Enclave, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT The above capti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »