Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Bind vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.89/2017 * + Judgment reserved on :31. t March, 2017. Date of decision :20. h JUNE, 2017 ..... Appellant ASHOK BIND Through: Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Addl.P.P. for the CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA State. JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. This appeal has been instituted by the appellant Ashok Bind son of Shri Ram Nain Bind assailing the impugned judgment dated 23.09.2016 and impugned order on sentence also dated 23.09.2016 of the learned Special Judge- 2, NDPS Act (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.100/2013 in relation to FIR No.99/13, P.S. NDRS. Vide the impugned judgment dated 23.09.2016, the accused/the appellant herein Ashok Bind was convicted for the commission of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 and vide the impugned order on sentence...
V.k Bhatnagar vs.canara Bank & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
$~21 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10210/2016 & CM No.40335/2016 % V.K. BHATNAGAR Reserved on:11. h April, 2017 Date of decision :20. h June, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush Choudhary, Adv. with petitioner versus CANARA BANK & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Premtosh Mishra, Mr. Mohit Sonkar and Ms. Anvesha Dwivedi, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The instant case reflects an extremely sorry state of affairs with regard to the manner in which the Canara Bank has conducted itself. We first set out the factual matrix, to the extent necessary, and as is discernible from the documentation of the Canara Bank- respondent no.1 before us.2. This writ petition has been filed by V.K. Bhatnagar, s/o Dr. Chander Bhan Bhatnagar a permanent resident of H-26/2, Sainik WP (C) No.10210/2016 page 1 of 17 Farm, Ward Deoli, Delhi-110062. The writ petitioner claims t...
The Director (Admn) National Airport Authority of India vs.shri Suresh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved:15.05.2017 Judgment Pronounced:20. h 06.2017 + W.P.(C) 23152/2005 THE DIRECTOR (ADMN) NATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Advocate Through versus SHRI SURESH KUMAR ..... Respondent Through Mr. Atul T. N., Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT The petitioner, the Director (Administration) of the National 1. Airports Authority of India vide this Writ Petition, impugns the award dated 25.05.2005 of the Presiding Officer of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court-II, New Delhi whereby the claimant / respondent herein Sh. Suresh Kumar whose services were terminated with effect from 01.11.1995 was held entitled to be reinstated with effect from 01.11.1995 (within one month from the publication of the award) to the post of Safai Karamchari with 25% back wages with directions that in case of default, the workman i.e. the respondent herein would be entitled ...
Lord Krishna Institute for Education vs.national Council for Teacher E ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
$~9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 06.2017 + WP(C) 5311/2017 LORD KRISHNA INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Amitesh Kumar and Mr Shashank Shekhar Singh For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms Monika Arora with Mr Harsh Ahuja for R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1906.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.22510/2017 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 657/2017 Page 1 of 3 W.P.(C) 5311/2017 & CM No.22509/2017(stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 19.04.2017 issued by the Regional Director, Northern Municipal Committee of National Council for Teacher Education, whereby the recognition granted to the petitioner Institution has been withdrawn.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Northern Regional Committee had no jurisdiction to pass such an order ...
Yash Technologies Private Limited vs.ce Info Systems Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
$~2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CM (M) 657/2017 Judgment delivered on:19. 06.2017 YASH TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus CE INFO SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj For the Respondent : CORAM: Mr Kirti Uppal Senior Advocate with Mr Amit P.Deshpande. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1906.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM No.22603/2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM (M) 657/2017 & CM No.22602/2017(stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 25.05.2017, whereby the learned Additional District Judge has noticed that the petitioner has CM(M) 657/2017 Page 1 of 4 not taken proper steps for summoning of the original arbitral record.... Petitioner has further been directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 12 lakhs within a period of ten days as against the arbitral award of Rs.20 lakhs with interest besides cost of Rs.1 lakh.2. Issue...
Ranjeet Singh vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 16, 2017 CRL.A. 218/2014 RANJEET SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae Counsel with Mr. Jatin Rajput, DHCLSC panel counsel & Mr. Himanshu Jain, Advocate Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State SI Rajendera, Police Station Vikas Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % ORAL1 Impugned judgment of 28th October, 2013 holds appellant guilty of the offences under SectionsIPC and vide impugned order of 11th November, 2013, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of `50,000/- with default clause for offence under Section 376 IPC and for offence under Section 354 IPC, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Page 1 of 4 Crl.A.218/2014 `10,000/- with default clause. The aforesaid two sentences have been directed by the trial cou...
Mohd. Safiq vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : May 31, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: June 16, 2017 CRL.A. 291/2016 WASIM AHMED ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Habibur Rahman, Adv. versus (DHCLSC) * % + STATE Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP for ..... Respondent State. CRL.A. 300/2016 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Adv. versus (DHCLSC) Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP for ..... Respondent State. + MOHD. JAVED STATE + CRL.A. 581/2016 MOHD. ABID STATE ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. (DHCLSC) versus Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP for ..... Respondent State. Crl. A. Nos. 291/16, 300/16, 5& 11Page 1 of 25 + CRL.A. 1143/2016 MOHD. SAFIQ ..... Appellant STATE Through : Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. (DHCLSC) versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA State. JUDGMENT A. K. CHAWLA, J.Appellants - Wasim Ahmed, Mohd. Javed, Mohd Abid and Mohd. Shafiq were charged for the trial of the...
Ram Khilawan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: June 16, 2017 CRL.A. 406/2015 RAM KHILAWAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae Counsel with Ms. Rakhi Dubey, DHCLSC panel counsel STATE Versus Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Additional ..... Respondent Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with WSI Sunita Kumai, Police Station Delhi Cantt. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORAL1 JUDGMENT In this appeal, challenge is to appellants conviction under Section 9 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and order of 28th November, 2014 vide which appellant has been awarded minimum sentence of rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, appellant has been directed to undergo sentence of simple imprisonment for four months. Crl.A.406/2015 Page 1 of 5 2. The facts as noted in the impugned judgment are as under:-"The facts in brief, as stated in the complaint, are that on 19.02.2013, an informat...
Ajay @ Munna vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 16, 2017 CRL.A. 14/2016 AJAY @ MUNNA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Amar Nath, Amicus Curiae with Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Delhi High Court Legal Services Committees Panel Advocate versus STATE Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Nanag Ram .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % (ORAL) JUDGMENT The challenge in this appeal is to impugned judgment of 30th September, 2015 vide which appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 392 of IPC read with Section 397 of IPC and to order of 20th November, 2015 vide which appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, trial court has directed that appellant shall undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days for the aforesaid offences. The facts emerging from impugned judgment are as under: - Page 1 of 5 Crl.A.14/2016 The prosecution case is that ASI Ram...
Wasim Ahmed vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : May 31, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: June 16, 2017 CRL.A. 291/2016 WASIM AHMED ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Habibur Rahman, Adv. versus (DHCLSC) * % + STATE Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP for ..... Respondent State. CRL.A. 300/2016 ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Adv. versus (DHCLSC) Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP for ..... Respondent State. + MOHD. JAVED STATE + CRL.A. 581/2016 MOHD. ABID STATE ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. (DHCLSC) versus Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP for ..... Respondent State. Crl. A. Nos. 291/16, 300/16, 5& 11Page 1 of 25 + CRL.A. 1143/2016 MOHD. SAFIQ ..... Appellant STATE Through : Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. (DHCLSC) versus ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA State. JUDGMENT A. K. CHAWLA, J.Appellants - Wasim Ahmed, Mohd. Javed, Mohd Abid and Mohd. Shafiq were charged for the trial of the...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »