Delhi Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Harvinder Singh @ Raju vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: June 01, 2017 (i) + CRL.A. 331/2016 HARVINDER SINGH @ RAJU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bharat Singh and Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocates (ii) + CRL.A. 410/2016 RANJEET URAO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Advocate (iii) + CRL.A. 784/2016 & Crl. M(B) 1532/2016 and Crl.M.As.12981-82/2016 MANOJ UARO Through: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, ..... Appellant Advocate (iv) + CRL.A. 228/2017 & Crl.M.A.3521-22/2017 PUNEET URAO Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate ..... Appellant VERSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, Advocate with Inspector R.K. Meena CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Crl.Appeals 331/16, 410/16, 7& 2Page 1 of 8 JUDGMENT % (ORAL) In the above-captioned four appeals, the challenge is to common impugned judgment of 22nd February, 2016 and order on sentence of 24th February, 2016 vide which all the four appellants have been held guilty for the offence under Section 395 of IPC and ...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.bharat Bhushan Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
$~1 (writ) * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REV. PET. 217/2017 in W.P.(C) 1497/2012 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Vandana Sehgal, Advocate. versus BHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0106.2017 CM APPL. 19718-19719/2017 1.2. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. REV. PET. 217/2017 in W.P.(C) 1497/2012 3. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereafter 'SDMC') has filed the present petition seeking review of the decision of this Court delivered on 11.05.2015 (hereafter 'the impugned order') whereby the above captioned writ petition preferred by the predecessor of the review petitioner (Municipal Corporation of Delhi), was dismissed.4. At the outset, Ms Vandana Sehgal, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner drew the attention of this Court to the order dated 05.05.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court...
Ratan Alias Tanu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI AJAY Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 1761/2014 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Adv., Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (amicus curiae) with appellant produced in custody. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with SI Pritosh Rathore PS Kirti Nagar. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1302/2015 * % + + STATE RATAN alias TANU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. STATE DHCLSC, Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (amicus curiae) with appellant produced in custody. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with SI Pritosh Rathore PS Kirti Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CRL.A. 1761/2014 & CRL.A. 1302/2015 Page 1 of 14 1. Vide impugned judgment dated 13th October, 2014 Ajay and Ratan @ Tanu were convicted for offence punishable under Section 3IPC. Ratan @ Tanu was also convicted for offences punishable under Section 397 IPC and Section Arms Act. Vide order on sente...
Shahadut Hussain vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 150/2015 MEHBOOB Represented by: Mr. K.N. Jha, Adv. ..... Appellant STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. CRL.A. 213/2015 & Crl.M.B. 61/2016 SHAHADUT HUSSAIN ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. DHCLSC and Mr. Bharat Chugh, Amicus Curiae.. STATE versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 438/2015 + SHAMSHAD STATE Represented by: Mr. Rajender Chhabra, Adv. ..... Appellant DHCLSC and Mr. Bharat Chugh, Amicus Curiae.. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with Insp. Gurmail Singh, EOW with SI Alok Vajpayee. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 479/2015 & Crl.M.B. 369/2017 CRL.A. 150/2015 & Ors. Page 1 of 15 MD. ABDUL QAYUM ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Puneet Singhal, Adv. DHCLSC and Mr. Bh...
Ajay vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI AJAY Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 1761/2014 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Biswajit Kumar Patra, Adv., Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (amicus curiae) with appellant produced in custody. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with SI Pritosh Rathore PS Kirti Nagar. ..... Respondent CRL.A. 1302/2015 * % + + STATE RATAN alias TANU ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. STATE DHCLSC, Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (amicus curiae) with appellant produced in custody. versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State with SI Pritosh Rathore PS Kirti Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CRL.A. 1761/2014 & CRL.A. 1302/2015 Page 1 of 14 1. Vide impugned judgment dated 13th October, 2014 Ajay and Ratan @ Tanu were convicted for offence punishable under Section 3IPC. Ratan @ Tanu was also convicted for offences punishable under Section 397 IPC and Section Arms Act. Vide order on sente...
Ashok vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
$~R-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 433/2013 ASHOK Represented by: Mr. Habibur Rehman, Adv. (DHCLSC) and Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (Amicus Curiae). ..... Appellant versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangirpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Ashok challenges the impugned judgment dated 28th April, 2012 convicting him for offences punishable under Sections 498A/304B IPC and the order on sentence dated 9th August, 2012 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of `1,000/- for offence punishable under Section 498A IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years for offence punishable under Section 304B IPC.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the only eye-witness on the spot was Sunita. She categorically stated that she was residing in the said house and w...
Shakuntala @ Shakoo & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:1. t June, 2017 CRL. A. NO.615/2000 SHAKUNTALA @ SHAKOO & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav and Mr. Narsingh Narain Rai, Advocates STATE versus Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State along with Inspector Vijay Kumar and SI Ombir, P.S. Nand Nagri. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants against the judgment dated 31.07.2000 by which the appellants have been held guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and Sections 3IPC and the order on sentence dated 02.08.2000 passed by the learned Trial Court in Sessions Case No.148/99, FIR No.800/97, Police Station Nand Nagri, by which the appellants have been sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.1,000/- each under Sections 3IPC and in default of payment ...
Khel Bahadur vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t June, 2017 CRL.A. 1672/2014 KHEL BAHADUR ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. S.K. Sethi, Adv. DHCLSC STATE with appellant produced in custody. versus Represented by: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State ..... Respondent with SI Dharmendra Pratap Singh PS Samaipur Badli. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Convicted for offences punishable under Section 397 read with Section 392 IPC, Khel Bahadur challenges the impugned judgment dated 25th August, 2014 and the order on sentence of the even date directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of `1,000/- for offence punishable under Section 397 IPC. No separate sentence was imposed with respect to offence punishable under Section 392 IPC.2. Assailing the conviction, Learned Counsel for the appellant contends that though the case of the prosecution is that soon after the incident the complainant made a PCR call a...
Sanjay Thapa vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : JUNE01 2017 CRL.A.516/2015 SANJAY THAPA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Ankur Sood with Ms.Romila Mandal, Advocates. STATE versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Through : Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP. S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant Sanjay Thapa to impugn a judgment 18.10.2014 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.arising out of FIR No.PS New Delhi Railway Station whereby he along with his associates was convicted under Section 392 read with Section 397 and 411 IPC. By an order dated 18.10.2014, he was awarded Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years under SectionsIPC with fine `5000/- and Rigorous Imprisonment for two years under Section 411 IPC. Both the sentences were to operate concurrently. Crl.A.516/2015 Page 1 of 3 2. Allegations against the appellant and his associates were that on 28.01.2010 at about 2.00 a.m. (night) on a running train, they...
Jamadar Ojha vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-2017
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1396/2012 JAMADAR OJHA Decided on:1. t June, 2017 ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Savita Singh, Adv. STATE & ORS. versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State ..... Respondent with ASI Tulli Ram, PS Badarpur. Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (Amicus Curiae) for R-2. CRL.A. 134/2013 RAJINDER TIWARI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Bharat Chugh, Adv. (Amicus Curiae) STATE versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for State ..... Respondent with ASI Tulli Ram, PS Badarpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Vide impugned judgment dated 29th August, 2012, Rajinder Tiwari and Sanjay Tiwari were convicted for offences punishable under Sections 498A/304B IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 15th September, 2012 Rajinder Tiwari and Sanjay Tiwari were sentenced to undergo rigorous Crl.A Nos. 1396/2012 & 134/2013 Page 1 of 19 imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each for of...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »